Anaheim Ducks
3-1-0
All Ducks playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Anaheim plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 4 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 4 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
57.7 shot attempts per 6013th of 32
52.9 shot attempts per 6024th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot18th of 32
a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot15th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.6% of chances come from rebounds3rd of 32
28.6% of chances come from rebounds1st of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.7% of chances come right after a turnover5th of 32
9.6% of chances come right after a turnover14th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
35.9% of shot attempts come from defensemen8th of 32
35.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen11th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
30.7% of shots come from within 20 feet15th of 32
33.9% of shots come from within 20 feet9th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
57.2 shot attempts allowed per 6018th of 32
53.5 shot attempts allowed per 6014th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot against21st of 32
a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot against12th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.41 defensive breakdowns per 6018th of 32
0.00 defensive breakdowns per 601st of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.08 goals saved above expected per 6020th of 32
+0.13 goals saved above expected per 6017th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
84.9 shots per 60, both teams combined4th of 32
73.5 shots per 60, both teams combined26th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 117 (100 is league average)6th of 3226.8 forecheck plays recorded per 605th of 32
forecheck score 126 (100 is league average)5th of 3231.2 forecheck plays recorded per 605th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 116 (100 is league average)5th of 3230.2 hits recorded per 606th of 32
hit score 125 (100 is league average)4th of 3236.1 hits recorded per 604th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
41.9% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six17th of 32
42.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six14th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
7.4 expected goals per 60 on the power play14th of 32
7.8 expected goals per 60 on the power play11th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
7.3 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded10th of 32
6.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded12th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
1.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded11th of 32
0.2 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded24th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.01 more penalties drawn than taken per 6017th of 32
0.74 more penalties taken than drawn per 6027th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Anaheim leans on, and what they do best.
20:27 a game
#45 · Right wing · 6 P in 4 GP (3 G, 3 A)
- Most ice time
- L3 · Colangelo, Carlsson
- PP1
- Drawing penaltiestop 6%
- Creating chancestop 8%
- Creating his own chancestop 10%
- Staying out of the boxbottom 6%
- Power-play chancestop 20%
- Fast burststop 9%
- Shooting volumebottom 23%
20:18 a game
#61 · Left wing · 4 P in 4 GP (2 G, 2 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L4 · Granlund, Nesterenko
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Shooting volume2nd
- FinishingTop 10
- Creating his own chancestop 7%
- Preventing chancesbottom 4%
- Shooting volumetop 14%
- Top speedtop 8%
- Hardest shottop 10%
- Staying out of the boxbottom 20%
19:48 a game
#64 · Center · 5 P in 4 GP (2 G, 3 A)
- L4 · Nesterenko, Gauthier
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Staying out of the boxtop 16%
- Creating chancestop 21%
- Hittingbottom 5%
- Hittingbottom 9%
19:32 a game
#91 · Center · 7 P in 4 GP (1 G, 6 A)
- L3 · Colangelo, Sennecke
- PP1
- Shorthanded threatTop 10
- Creating chancestop 6%
- Creating his own chancestop 8%
- Hittingbottom 1%
- Drawing penaltiestop 22%
- Distance skatedTop 10
- Hittingbottom 9%
28:40 a game
#2 · Defenseman · 4 P in 4 GP (0 G, 4 A)
- Most ice time
- P2 · Warren
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Takeaways1st
- Staying out of the box2nd
- Shorthanded threatTop 5
- Finishingbottom 1%
- Takeawaystop 9%
22:22 a game
#67 · Defenseman · 1 P in 4 GP (0 G, 1 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P3 · Hinds
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
No clear strengths or weak spots yet.
- Creating chancestop 14%
- Hittingbottom 18%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Ducks players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (4 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
- L17:42 a game
- Creates
- 3.19
- Allows
- 2.20
- Share
- 59.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 27%
- L2New10:50 last game
- Creates
- 3.18
- Allows
- 2.09
- Share
- 60.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 33%
- L3New8:46 last game
S. ColangeloL. CarlssonB. Sennecke
- Creates
- 2.51
- Allows
- 2.27
- Share
- 52.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 100%
- L4New8:14 last game
M. GranlundN. NesterenkoC. Gauthier
- Creates
- 2.34
- Allows
- 2.65
- Share
- 46.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- P111:47 a game
- Creates
- 2.47
- Allows
- 2.21
- Share
- 52.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 36%
- P2New16:24 last game
- Creates
- 2.59
- Allows
- 2.36
- Share
- 52.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 60%
- P3New10:59 last game
- Creates
- 3.10
- Allows
- 2.73
- Share
- 53.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 33%
Last game
At Winnipeg Jets, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Anaheim group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Killorn, Greer, Poehling (L2) have spent 54% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 29%.
- Granlund, Nesterenko, Gauthier (L4) have spent 56% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 34%.
- Colangelo, Carlsson, Sennecke (L3) have spent 33% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 19%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Caulfield · Malott · WasheOpp. L129%Opp. L227%Opp. L316%Opp. L428%
- L2Killorn · Greer · PoehlingOpp. L123%Opp. L254%Opp. L39%Opp. L414%
- L3Colangelo · Carlsson · SenneckeOpp. L135%Opp. L217%Opp. L333%Opp. L415%
- L4Granlund · Nesterenko · GauthierOpp. L156%Opp. L221%Opp. L315%Opp. L48%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Mintyukov · MitchellOpp. L129%Opp. L238%Opp. L317%Opp. L416%
- P2LaCombe · WarrenOpp. L138%Opp. L228%Opp. L318%Opp. L416%
- P3Hinds · LuneauOpp. L132%Opp. L219%Opp. L322%Opp. L427%
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Caulfield · Malott · WasheOpp. L143%Opp. L222%Opp. L38%Opp. L428%
- L2Killorn · Greer · PoehlingOpp. L12%Opp. L250%Opp. L319%Opp. L429%
- L3Colangelo · Carlsson · SenneckeOpp. L137%Opp. L230%Opp. L36%Opp. L427%
- L4Granlund · Nesterenko · GauthierOpp. L152%Opp. L239%Opp. L33%Opp. L46%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Mintyukov · MitchellOpp. L129%Opp. L239%Opp. L310%Opp. L422%
- P2LaCombe · WarrenOpp. L138%Opp. L229%Opp. L317%Opp. L416%
- P3Hinds · LuneauOpp. L148%Opp. L23%Opp. L313%Opp. L437%
Standing out on the road
- Colangelo, Carlsson, Sennecke (L3) have spent 48% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 25%.
- Caulfield, Malott, Washe (L1) have spent 29% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 15%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Caulfield · Malott · WasheOpp. L115%Opp. L232%Opp. L324%Opp. L429%
- L2Killorn · Greer · PoehlingOpp. L128%Opp. L256%Opp. L37%Opp. L49%
- L3Colangelo · Carlsson · SenneckeOpp. L133%Opp. L210%Opp. L348%Opp. L48%
- L4Granlund · Nesterenko · GauthierOpp. L157%Opp. L216%Opp. L318%Opp. L49%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Mintyukov · MitchellOpp. L129%Opp. L237%Opp. L323%Opp. L411%
- P2LaCombe · WarrenOpp. L138%Opp. L228%Opp. L318%Opp. L416%
- P3Hinds · LuneauOpp. L130%Opp. L221%Opp. L323%Opp. L426%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Anaheim group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Anaheim, every Anaheim group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Anaheim sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (4 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP186% of the time
Creates 7.6 expected goals per 60
- J. LaCombeQuarterback
- M. Granlund
- C. GauthierTrigger
- L. CarlssonDistributor
- B. SenneckeNet-front
PP214% of the time
Creates 7.0 expected goals per 60
- T. LuneauQuarterback
- P. MintyukovTrigger
- R. Poehling
- A. Greer
- N. Klepov
Penalty kill
Kills allow 7.3 expected goals per 60, 10th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 6.4 expected goals per 60, 12th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- T. Washe15 of 15 kills · 1:02 a kill · takes the draw
- M. Granlund14 of 15 kills · 0:56 a kill
- J. LaCombeD15 of 15 kills · 1:01 a kill
- N. WarrenD14 of 15 kills · 0:56 a kill
- T. LuneauD11 of 15 kills · 0:50 a kill
Second wave
- A. Killorn14 of 15 kills · 0:46 a kill
- R. Poehling13 of 15 kills · 0:42 a kill
- P. MintyukovD14 of 15 kills · 0:50 a kill
- T. MitchellD6 of 15 kills · 0:47 a kill
Spot duty
- N. Nesterenko3 of 15 kills · 0:45 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
L. Dostal58 starts · 1607 shots faced, this season and last
+2.9 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .973 735 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .853 606 shots
- High-danger save %
- .733 266 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 27.6
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.4
- Quality starts
- 53%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for L. DostalHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+2.9 goals saved above expected in 58 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
27.6 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.4 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 71 seconds between shots; 21% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 53% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 22%
- Overall save %
- .888
L. Dostal4 starts · 94 shots faced, this season
+0.1 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .977 44 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .857 28 shots
- High-danger save %
- .727 22 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 75%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for L. DostalHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+0.1 goals saved above expected in 4 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
25.2 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.1% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 88 seconds between shots; 21% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 75% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 25%
- Overall save %
- .883
V. Husso19 starts · 536 shots faced, this season and last
−2.0 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .972 253 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .843 198 shots
- High-danger save %
- .718 85 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 27.7
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.21
- Quality starts
- 42%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for V. HussoHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−2.0 goals saved above expected in 19 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
27.7 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.21 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots; 20% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 42% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 32%
- Overall save %
- .884
V. Husso0 starts · 2 shots faced, this season
+0.5 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- – 0 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- 1.000 2 shots
- High-danger save %
- – 0 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 7.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- –
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for V. HussoHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+0.5 goals saved above expected in 0 startstoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
7.5 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 9.1% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 437 seconds between shots; 100% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start null% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- –
- Overall save %
- 1.000
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Anaheim’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: more of Anaheim’s goals come from play with the goalie pulled.
- Everyday even-strength play52.5%167 of 318
- Power play20.1%64 of 318
- Rebound8.5%27 of 318
- Empty net6.3%20 of 318
- Off a turnover4.1%13 of 318
- Goalie pulled4.1%13 of 318
- Shorthanded2.5%8 of 318
- Off a faceoff win1.9%6 of 318
318 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of Anaheim’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play35.7%5 of 14
- Power play35.7%5 of 14
- Rebound14.3%2 of 14
- Empty net7.1%1 of 14
- Off a turnover0%0 of 14
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 14
- Shorthanded0%0 of 14
- Off a faceoff win7.1%1 of 14
14 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals Anaheim allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play56.3%192 of 341
- Power play21.4%73 of 341
- Rebound5.9%20 of 341
- Empty net6.2%21 of 341
- Off a turnover3.5%12 of 341
- Goalie pulled2.9%10 of 341
- Shorthanded2.1%7 of 341
- Off a faceoff win1.8%6 of 341
341 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals Anaheim allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play54.5%6 of 11
- Power play18.2%2 of 11
- Rebound9.1%1 of 11
- Empty net0%0 of 11
- Off a turnover9.1%1 of 11
- Goalie pulled9.1%1 of 11
- Shorthanded0%0 of 11
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 11
11 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.