Boston Bruins
4-2-0
All Bruins playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Boston plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 6 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 6 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
55.2 shot attempts per 6020th of 32
53.8 shot attempts per 6022nd of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.1% chance of scoring on the average shot24th of 32
a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot19th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.2% of chances come from rebounds16th of 32
2.2% of chances come from rebounds32nd of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.3% of chances come right after a turnover17th of 32
8.5% of chances come right after a turnover15th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
31.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen31st of 32
30.4% of shot attempts come from defensemen28th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
28.7% of shots come from within 20 feet30th of 32
28.6% of shots come from within 20 feet23rd of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
57.0 shot attempts allowed per 6017th of 32
54.2 shot attempts allowed per 6015th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot against12th of 32
a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot against11th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.41 defensive breakdowns per 6017th of 32
0.64 defensive breakdowns per 6023rd of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.23 goals saved above expected per 602nd of 32
+1.02 goals saved above expected per 606th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
82.5 shots per 60, both teams combined13th of 32
80.3 shots per 60, both teams combined14th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 93 (100 is league average)21st of 3221.9 forecheck plays recorded per 6018th of 32
forecheck score 85 (100 is league average)23rd of 3221.7 forecheck plays recorded per 6022nd of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 105 (100 is league average)12th of 3229.2 hits recorded per 607th of 32
hit score 101 (100 is league average)16th of 3230.9 hits recorded per 6013th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
43.9% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six4th of 32
44.6% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six5th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
7.4 expected goals per 60 on the power play17th of 32
4.7 expected goals per 60 on the power play26th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
7.7 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded20th of 32
7.9 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded22nd of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
0.6 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded31st of 32
0.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded28th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.26 more penalties taken than drawn per 6032nd of 32
0.50 more penalties taken than drawn per 6025th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Boston leans on, and what they do best.
18:31 a game
#88 · Right wing · 7 P in 6 GP (2 G, 5 A)
- Most ice time
- L1 · Zacha, Geekie
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Shooting volume3rd
- Setting up goals1st
- Drawing penaltiestop 18%
- Shot blockingbottom 11%
- Shooting volumetop 6%
- Setting up goalstop 25%
- Distance skatedbottom 2%
17:16 a game
#18 · Center · 2 P in 6 GP (1 G, 1 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L1 · Pastrnak, Geekie
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Finishingtop 4%
- Hardest shottop 8%
- Drawing penaltiesbottom 1%
- Takeawaystop 13%
- Shooting volumetop 25%
- Hardest shotTop 10
- Hittingbottom 25%
16:23 a game
#39 · Center · 4 P in 6 GP (1 G, 3 A)
- L1 · Pastrnak, Zacha
- PP1
- Finishing1st
- Staying out of the boxtop 13%
- Hardest shot1st
- Shot blockingbottom 21%
- Hardest shotTop 5
- Distance skatedbottom 2%
15:55 a game
#10 · Right wing · 4 P in 6 GP (2 G, 2 A)
- L4 · Khusnutdinov, Minten
- PP2
- Finishingtop 16%
- Fast burststop 13%
- Shot blockingbottom 4%
- Top speedtop 10%
- Fast burststop 13%
- Distance skatedbottom 4%
19:32 a game
#75 · Defenseman · 1 P in 6 GP (0 G, 1 A)
- Most ice time
- P1 · Zadorov
- Kills penalties
- Hittingtop 7%
- Preventing chancestop 9%
- Creating chancestop 21%
- Staying out of the boxbottom 10%
- Hittingtop 18%
- Takeawaystop 25%
- Distance skatedbottom 4%
19:27 a game
#91 · Defenseman · 2 P in 6 GP (0 G, 2 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P1 · Clifton
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- HittingTop 10
- Drawing penaltiestop 7%
- Top speed2nd
- Staying out of the boxbottom 4%
- HittingTop 10
- Creating his own chancestop 20%
- Distance skatedbottom 6%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Bruins players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (6 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Worth knowing
- C. McAvoy has not played this season. M. Lohrei is in his usual spot beside J. Aspirot, up from third-pair minutes last season. That pair is getting 15:08 a game at 5-on-5, up from 12:59 with McAvoy. W. Borgen has moved into Lohrei’s old spot beside H. Lindholm.
- L17:49 a gamein 3 of last 6
- Creates
- 3.28
- Allows
- 2.24
- Share
- 59.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- L27:59 a gamein 2 of last 6
E. LindholmC. MittelstadtJ. Hagens
- Creates
- 3.08
- Allows
- 2.13
- Share
- 59.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 33%
- L36:31 a gamein 2 of last 6
T. JeannotM. KastelicM. Poitras
- Creates
- 2.35
- Allows
- 2.75
- Share
- 46.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 31%
- L47:14 a gamein 2 of last 6
J. PeterkaM. KhusnutdinovF. Minten
- Creates
- 2.73
- Allows
- 2.93
- Share
- 48.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 56%
- P114:53 a game
- Creates
- 2.70
- Allows
- 2.19
- Share
- 55.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 53%
- P213:24 a game
- Creates
- 2.75
- Allows
- 2.53
- Share
- 52.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 49%
- P311:33 a gamein 3 of last 6
- Creates
- 2.75
- Allows
- 2.94
- Share
- 48.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 46%
Last game
Against Philadelphia Flyers, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Boston group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Jeannot, Kastelic, Poitras (L3) have spent 32% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 16%.
- Peterka, Khusnutdinov, Minten (L4) have spent 30% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 20%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Pastrnak · Zacha · GeekieOpp. L133%Opp. L233%Opp. L317%Opp. L417%
- L2Lindholm · Mittelstadt · HagensOpp. L140%Opp. L237%Opp. L317%Opp. L47%
- L3Jeannot · Kastelic · PoitrasOpp. L122%Opp. L233%Opp. L312%Opp. L432%
- L4Peterka · Khusnutdinov · MintenOpp. L129%Opp. L231%Opp. L330%Opp. L49%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Clifton · ZadorovOpp. L133%Opp. L235%Opp. L318%Opp. L414%
- P2Lindholm · BorgenOpp. L138%Opp. L228%Opp. L316%Opp. L417%
- P3Lohrei · BrunetOpp. L126%Opp. L233%Opp. L325%Opp. L416%
Standing out at home
- Peterka, Khusnutdinov, Minten (L4) have spent 45% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 27%.
- Jeannot, Kastelic, Poitras (L3) have spent 32% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 15%.
- Lindholm, Mittelstadt, Hagens (L2) have spent 38% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 26%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Pastrnak · Zacha · GeekieOpp. L122%Opp. L241%Opp. L323%Opp. L414%
- L2Lindholm · Mittelstadt · HagensOpp. L138%Opp. L238%Opp. L317%Opp. L47%
- L3Jeannot · Kastelic · PoitrasOpp. L120%Opp. L232%Opp. L316%Opp. L432%
- L4Peterka · Khusnutdinov · MintenOpp. L129%Opp. L217%Opp. L345%Opp. L49%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Clifton · ZadorovOpp. L132%Opp. L232%Opp. L322%Opp. L413%
- P2Lindholm · BorgenOpp. L130%Opp. L233%Opp. L322%Opp. L416%
- P3Lohrei · BrunetOpp. L121%Opp. L228%Opp. L336%Opp. L415%
Standing out on the road
- Peterka, Khusnutdinov, Minten (L4) have spent 59% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 36%.
- Pastrnak, Zacha, Geekie (L1) have spent 66% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 44%.
- Lindholm, Borgen (P2) have spent 62% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 44%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Pastrnak · Zacha · GeekieOpp. L166%Opp. L210%Opp. L30%Opp. L424%
- L2Lindholm · Mittelstadt · HagensOpp. L194%Opp. L26%Opp. L30%Opp. L40%
- L3Jeannot · Kastelic · PoitrasOpp. L131%Opp. L237%Opp. L30%Opp. L431%
- L4Peterka · Khusnutdinov · MintenOpp. L129%Opp. L259%Opp. L31%Opp. L410%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Clifton · ZadorovOpp. L136%Opp. L243%Opp. L35%Opp. L415%
- P2Lindholm · BorgenOpp. L162%Opp. L215%Opp. L31%Opp. L422%
- P3Lohrei · BrunetOpp. L135%Opp. L245%Opp. L31%Opp. L419%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Boston group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Boston, every Boston group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Boston sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (6 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP156% of the time
Creates 6.6 expected goals per 60
- M. LohreiQuarterback
- D. Pastrnakboth unitsTrigger
- M. GeekieDistributor
- P. ZachaNet-front
- E. LindholmNet-front
PP243% of the time
Creates 5.9 expected goals per 60
- H. LindholmQuarterback
- D. Pastrnakboth unitsTrigger
- J. Peterka
- J. Hagens
- C. MittelstadtDistributor
Penalty kill
Kills allow 7.7 expected goals per 60, 20th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 7.9 expected goals per 60, 22nd of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- M. Khusnutdinov14 of 14 kills · 0:49 a kill
- N. ZadorovD14 of 14 kills · 1:00 a kill
- C. CliftonD14 of 14 kills · 0:56 a kill
Second wave
- E. Lindholm12 of 14 kills · 0:43 a kill · takes the draw
- F. Minten11 of 14 kills · 0:43 a kill · takes the draw
- P. Zacha9 of 14 kills · 0:48 a kill · takes the draw
- M. Kastelic11 of 14 kills · 0:37 a kill
- T. Jeannot8 of 14 kills · 0:38 a kill
- H. LindholmD12 of 14 kills · 0:56 a kill
- W. BorgenD11 of 14 kills · 1:00 a kill
Spot duty
- S. Kuraly5 of 14 kills · 0:25 a kill
- F. BrunetD2 of 14 kills · 0:54 a kill
- M. LohreiD2 of 14 kills · 0:48 a kill
- J. AspirotD3 of 14 kills · 0:22 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
J. Swayman59 starts · 1703 shots faced, this season and last
+33.6 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .964 868 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .898 567 shots
- High-danger save %
- .754 268 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.9
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.31
- Quality starts
- 73%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. SwaymanHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+33.6 goals saved above expected in 59 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
28.9 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.2% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.31 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 68 seconds between shots; 20% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 73% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 17%
- Overall save %
- .909
J. Swayman5 starts · 131 shots faced, this season
+5.1 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .972 71 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .976 42 shots
- High-danger save %
- .667 18 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 26.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.4
- Quality starts
- 80%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. SwaymanHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+5.1 goals saved above expected in 5 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
26.3 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.9% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.4 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 66 seconds between shots; 23% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 80% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 20%
- Overall save %
- .931
M. DiPietro1 start · 31 shots faced, this season and last
−0.5 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- .938 16 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .900 10 shots
- High-danger save %
- .800 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.94
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for M. DiPietroHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−0.5 goals saved above expected in 1 starttoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
29.1 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.6% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.94 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 79 seconds between shots; 23% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .903
M. DiPietro1 start · 29 shots faced, this season
−0.7 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- .933 15 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .889 9 shots
- High-danger save %
- .800 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 30.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.04
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for M. DiPietroHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−0.7 goals saved above expected in 1 starttoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
30.1 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.6% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
1.04 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 79 seconds between shots; 21% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .897
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Boston’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: fewer of Boston’s goals come from shorthanded play.
- Everyday even-strength play57.9%172 of 297
- Power play19.2%57 of 297
- Rebound6.4%19 of 297
- Empty net5.4%16 of 297
- Off a turnover6.4%19 of 297
- Goalie pulled2%6 of 297
- Shorthanded1%3 of 297
- Off a faceoff win1.7%5 of 297
297 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of Boston’s goals come from turnovers.
- Everyday even-strength play52.9%9 of 17
- Power play17.6%3 of 17
- Rebound0%0 of 17
- Empty net5.9%1 of 17
- Off a turnover17.6%3 of 17
- Goalie pulled5.9%1 of 17
- Shorthanded0%0 of 17
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 17
17 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Boston allows come from the power play.
- Everyday even-strength play51.6%144 of 279
- Power play24.4%68 of 279
- Rebound5.4%15 of 279
- Empty net5.4%15 of 279
- Off a turnover4.3%12 of 279
- Goalie pulled2.9%8 of 279
- Shorthanded3.6%10 of 279
- Off a faceoff win2.5%7 of 279
279 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals Boston allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play58.3%7 of 12
- Power play25%3 of 12
- Rebound0%0 of 12
- Empty net8.3%1 of 12
- Off a turnover0%0 of 12
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 12
- Shorthanded8.3%1 of 12
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 12
12 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.