Calgary Flames
0-4-0
All Flames playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Calgary plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 4 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 4 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
63.4 shot attempts per 606th of 32
68.7 shot attempts per 605th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 5.6% chance of scoring on the average shot32nd of 32
a 5.1% chance of scoring on the average shot32nd of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.0% of chances come from rebounds29th of 32
3.0% of chances come from rebounds30th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.8% of chances come right after a turnover3rd of 32
13.2% of chances come right after a turnover4th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
34.0% of shot attempts come from defensemen21st of 32
36.4% of shot attempts come from defensemen7th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
29.3% of shots come from within 20 feet27th of 32
32.5% of shots come from within 20 feet16th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
61.3 shot attempts allowed per 6029th of 32
64.7 shot attempts allowed per 6029th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against16th of 32
a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot against14th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.46 defensive breakdowns per 6030th of 32
0.59 defensive breakdowns per 6021st of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.06 goals saved above expected per 6024th of 32
−2.38 goals saved above expected per 6031st of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
85.9 shots per 60, both teams combined2nd of 32
95.2 shots per 60, both teams combined1st of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 101 (100 is league average)15th of 3222.7 forecheck plays recorded per 6015th of 32
forecheck score 107 (100 is league average)10th of 3225.7 forecheck plays recorded per 6011th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 106 (100 is league average)11th of 3228.0 hits recorded per 6011th of 32
hit score 113 (100 is league average)10th of 3232.9 hits recorded per 6010th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
43.7% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six5th of 32
44.9% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six3rd of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
6.5 expected goals per 60 on the power play30th of 32
4.6 expected goals per 60 on the power play28th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
7.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded18th of 32
4.8 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded5th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded3rd of 32
1.2 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded10th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.20 more penalties taken than drawn per 6029th of 32
1.50 more penalties taken than drawn per 6032nd of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Calgary leans on, and what they do best.

- Most ice time
- L3 · Farabee, Sharangovich
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes

- 2nd in ice time
- L1 · Frost, Gridin
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Hittingbottom 11%

- L3 · Backlund, Sharangovich
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Takeawaystop 13%
- Hittingbottom 11%
- Takeawaystop 13%
- Staying out of the boxbottom 17%

- L3 · Backlund, Farabee
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- Staying out of the boxtop 5%
- Hardest shotTop 10
- Creating his own chancesbottom 19%

- Most ice time
- P2 · Whitecloud
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Top speedtop 11%
- Shot blockingbottom 25%

- 2nd in ice time
- P3 · Kuznetsov
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- Shooting volumetop 6%
- Creating his own chancestop 17%
- Fast burststop 9%
- Preventing chancesbottom 16%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Flames players.
OutNobody reported out.
Show the full roster · 27 playersHide the full roster
Forwards
- 11Mikael BacklundC4 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 17:15
- 27Matt CoronatoRW4 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 17:12
- 86Joel FarabeeLW4 GP · 0 G · 3 A · 16:25
- 17Yegor SharangovichC4 GP · 0 G · 2 A · 16:05
- 16Morgan FrostC4 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 15:58
- 29Samuel HonzekLW4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 15:38
- 92Matvei GridinRW4 GP · 0 G · 1 A · 14:32
- 22Ryan StromeC4 GP · 1 G · 1 A · 14:09
- 47Connor ZaryCOff the NHL roster
- 76Martin PospisilC4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 13:22
- 72Maxim TsyplakovRW3 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 12:05
- 61Aydar SunievLW1 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 11:41
- 78Brennan OthmannLW1 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 10:30
- 43Adam KlapkaRW4 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 10:23
- 38Jonathan CastagnaC1 GP · 0 G · 1 A · 9:09
- 10Jonathan HuberdeauLW
Defense
- 7Kevin BahlD4 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 21:22
- 71Simon NemecD4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 20:40
- 28Zach WhitecloudD4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 20:22
- 19Zayne ParekhD4 GP · 0 G · 1 A · 19:16
- 37Yan KuznetsovD3 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 18:51
- 55Jake MiddletonD4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 18:29
- 44Joel HanleyD1 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 16:18
- Brayden PachalDOff the NHL roster
- Hunter BrzustewiczDOff the NHL roster
Goalies
- 1Devin CooleyG2 GP · .818
- 32Dustin WolfG2 GP · .797
As of Oct. 10. Injury details come from the NHL.com Status Report when it names a player; otherwise we only say what the rosters show.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (4 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Worth knowing
- M. Pospisil has started killing penalties: on the ice for 29% of the team’s shorthanded time in 4 games, up from 2% last season.
- L19:58 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 3.25
- Allows
- 2.51
- Share
- 56.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 84%
- L2New9:46 last game
- Creates
- 2.81
- Allows
- 2.26
- Share
- 55.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 64%
- L3New11:51 last game
M. BacklundJ. FarabeeY. Sharangovich
- Creates
- 2.61
- Allows
- 2.35
- Share
- 52.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 92%
- L4New6:31 last game
- Creates
- 2.47
- Allows
- 2.84
- Share
- 46.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 40%
- P113:56 a game
- Creates
- 2.58
- Allows
- 2.45
- Share
- 51.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 68%
- P213:08 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.67
- Allows
- 2.31
- Share
- 53.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 56%
- P314:58 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.48
- Allows
- 2.90
- Share
- 46.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 52%
Last game
Against Colorado Avalanche, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Calgary group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Backlund, Farabee, Sharangovich (L3) have spent 50% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 31%.
- Strome, Pospisil, Honzek (L2) have spent 41% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 29%.
- Whitecloud, Bahl (P2) have spent 41% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 30%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Frost · Coronato · GridinOpp. L125%Opp. L223%Opp. L332%Opp. L419%
- L2Strome · Pospisil · HonzekOpp. L141%Opp. L218%Opp. L327%Opp. L414%
- L3Backlund · Farabee · SharangovichOpp. L125%Opp. L250%Opp. L321%Opp. L44%
- L4Klapka · Castagna · SunievOpp. L127%Opp. L210%Opp. L310%Opp. L453%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Middleton · ParekhOpp. L122%Opp. L224%Opp. L334%Opp. L421%
- P2Whitecloud · BahlOpp. L121%Opp. L241%Opp. L320%Opp. L417%
- P3Kuznetsov · NemecOpp. L131%Opp. L222%Opp. L317%Opp. L430%
Standing out at home
- Backlund, Farabee, Sharangovich (L3) have spent 45% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 26%.
- Whitecloud, Bahl (P2) have spent 41% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 27%.
- Middleton, Parekh (P1) have spent 39% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 29%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Frost · Coronato · GridinOpp. L127%Opp. L225%Opp. L326%Opp. L422%
- L2Strome · Pospisil · HonzekOpp. L141%Opp. L24%Opp. L337%Opp. L418%
- L3Backlund · Farabee · SharangovichOpp. L129%Opp. L245%Opp. L325%Opp. L41%
- L4Klapka · Castagna · SunievOpp. L127%Opp. L210%Opp. L310%Opp. L453%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Middleton · ParekhOpp. L125%Opp. L216%Opp. L339%Opp. L419%
- P2Whitecloud · BahlOpp. L127%Opp. L241%Opp. L321%Opp. L411%
- P3Kuznetsov · NemecOpp. L136%Opp. L213%Opp. L323%Opp. L427%
Standing out on the road
- Backlund, Farabee, Sharangovich (L3) have spent 57% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 38%.
- Frost, Coronato, Gridin (L1) have spent 40% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 24%.
- Kuznetsov, Nemec (P3) have spent 29% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 19%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Frost · Coronato · GridinOpp. L122%Opp. L221%Opp. L340%Opp. L417%
- L2Strome · Pospisil · HonzekOpp. L141%Opp. L231%Opp. L317%Opp. L410%
- L3Backlund · Farabee · SharangovichOpp. L120%Opp. L257%Opp. L316%Opp. L48%
- L4Klapka · Castagna · SunievOpp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Middleton · ParekhOpp. L117%Opp. L233%Opp. L327%Opp. L424%
- P2Whitecloud · BahlOpp. L113%Opp. L242%Opp. L319%Opp. L427%
- P3Kuznetsov · NemecOpp. L129%Opp. L227%Opp. L314%Opp. L431%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Calgary group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Calgary, every Calgary group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Calgary sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (4 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP182% of the time
Creates 6.7 expected goals per 60
- Z. ParekhQuarterback
- M. CoronatoTrigger
- M. FrostDistributor
- M. Gridin
- J. FarabeeNet-front
PP218% of the time
Creates 6.6 expected goals per 60
- S. NemecQuarterback
- M. Tsyplakov
- R. Strome
- Y. SharangovichTrigger
- B. Othmann
Penalty kill
Kills allow 7.5 expected goals per 60, 18th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 4.8 expected goals per 60, 5th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- M. Backlund12 of 12 kills · 1:03 a kill · takes the draw
- S. Honzek12 of 12 kills · 0:54 a kill
- Z. WhitecloudD12 of 12 kills · 1:03 a kill
- K. BahlD10 of 12 kills · 1:06 a kill
- J. MiddletonD9 of 12 kills · 1:04 a kill
- Y. KuznetsovD6 of 12 kills · 0:46 a kill
Second wave
- J. Farabee7 of 12 kills · 0:57 a kill
- M. Pospisil9 of 12 kills · 0:41 a kill
- Y. Sharangovich8 of 12 kills · 0:31 a kill
- S. NemecD8 of 12 kills · 0:23 a kill
- J. HanleyD5 of 12 kills · 0:36 a kill
Spot duty
- R. Strome2 of 12 kills · 0:33 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
D. Wolf54 starts · 1618 shots faced, this season and last
−3.3 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .975 807 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .849 596 shots
- High-danger save %
- .721 215 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29.7
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.39
- Quality starts
- 54%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for D. WolfHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−3.3 goals saved above expected in 54 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
29.7 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.9% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.39 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 69 seconds between shots; 20% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 54% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 19%
- Overall save %
- .895
D. Wolf2 starts · 59 shots faced, this season
−5.2 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .958 24 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .769 26 shots
- High-danger save %
- .444 9 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1
- Quality starts
- 0%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for D. WolfHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−5.2 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
29.5 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.5% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
1 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 66 seconds between shots; 15% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 0% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 100%
- Overall save %
- .797
D. Cooley31 starts · 902 shots faced, this season and last
+12.9 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .977 436 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .871 318 shots
- High-danger save %
- .757 148 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.56
- Quality starts
- 71%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for D. CooleyHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+12.9 goals saved above expected in 31 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
29.4 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.56 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 68 seconds between shots; 20% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 71% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 16%
- Overall save %
- .904
D. Cooley2 starts · 55 shots faced, this season
−4.3 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .875 24 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .800 25 shots
- High-danger save %
- .667 6 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 27.6
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 0%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for D. CooleyHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−4.3 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
27.6 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 55 seconds between shots; 25% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 0% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 50%
- Overall save %
- .818
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Calgary’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: more of Calgary’s goals come from shorthanded play; fewer from play with the goalie pulled.
- Everyday even-strength play57.3%122 of 213
- Power play17.8%38 of 213
- Rebound7%15 of 213
- Empty net6.1%13 of 213
- Off a turnover3.8%8 of 213
- Goalie pulled0.9%2 of 213
- Shorthanded4.7%10 of 213
- Off a faceoff win2.3%5 of 213
213 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of Calgary’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play66.7%4 of 6
- Power play33.3%2 of 6
- Rebound0%0 of 6
- Empty net0%0 of 6
- Off a turnover0%0 of 6
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 6
- Shorthanded0%0 of 6
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 6
6 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Calgary allows come from everyday even-strength play.
- Everyday even-strength play60.9%170 of 279
- Power play16.8%47 of 279
- Rebound6.1%17 of 279
- Empty net7.5%21 of 279
- Off a turnover5%14 of 279
- Goalie pulled1.4%4 of 279
- Shorthanded1.1%3 of 279
- Off a faceoff win1.1%3 of 279
279 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Calgary allows come from everyday even-strength play; fewer from the power play.
- Everyday even-strength play78.3%18 of 23
- Power play4.3%1 of 23
- Rebound8.7%2 of 23
- Empty net4.3%1 of 23
- Off a turnover4.3%1 of 23
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 23
- Shorthanded0%0 of 23
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 23
23 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.