Dallas Stars
2-2-0
All Stars playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Dallas plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 4 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 4 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
53.8 shot attempts per 6024th of 32
56.9 shot attempts per 6013th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot4th of 32
a 6.1% chance of scoring on the average shot22nd of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.5% of chances come from rebounds4th of 32
12.0% of chances come from rebounds13th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.0% of chances come right after a turnover25th of 32
8.2% of chances come right after a turnover16th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
34.1% of shot attempts come from defensemen20th of 32
32.6% of shot attempts come from defensemen21st of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
33.0% of shots come from within 20 feet2nd of 32
33.1% of shots come from within 20 feet14th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
53.6 shot attempts allowed per 607th of 32
51.8 shot attempts allowed per 6010th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against17th of 32
a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot against21st of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.39 defensive breakdowns per 6011th of 32
0.00 defensive breakdowns per 601st of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.14 goals saved above expected per 607th of 32
+1.16 goals saved above expected per 603rd of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
74.5 shots per 60, both teams combined32nd of 32
72.2 shots per 60, both teams combined29th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 93 (100 is league average)20th of 3221.1 forecheck plays recorded per 6021st of 32
forecheck score 92 (100 is league average)18th of 3222.5 forecheck plays recorded per 6018th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 96 (100 is league average)21st of 3226.0 hits recorded per 6018th of 32
hit score 99 (100 is league average)17th of 3229.2 hits recorded per 6017th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
41.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six18th of 32
42.7% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six15th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
9.0 expected goals per 60 on the power play3rd of 32
10.3 expected goals per 60 on the power play2nd of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
6.8 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded5th of 32
3.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded1st of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded28th of 32
0.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded27th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.08 more penalties taken than drawn per 6022nd of 32
0.25 more penalties taken than drawn per 6019th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Dallas leans on, and what they do best.
19:46 a game
#96 · Right wing · 6 P in 4 GP (2 G, 4 A)
- Most ice time
- L3 · Steel, Johnston
- PP1
- Drawing penaltiestop 4%
- Setting up goalstop 7%
- Preventing chancestop 25%
- Staying out of the boxbottom 12%
- Setting up goalstop 20%
- Hardest shottop 12%
- Distance skatedbottom 9%
19:31 a game
#53 · Center · 4 P in 4 GP (0 G, 4 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L3 · Rantanen, Steel
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Power-play chances2nd
- Creating chancestop 4%
- Finishingtop 7%
- Preventing chancesbottom 1%
- Hardest shottop 15%
- Hittingbottom 25%
17:52 a game
#21 · Left wing · 3 P in 4 GP (2 G, 1 A)
- L1 · Benn, Hintz
- PP1
- Creating chancestop 3%
- Creating his own chancestop 7%
- Finishingtop 7%
- Fast burstsbottom 12%
- Takeawaystop 13%
- Distance skatedbottom 9%
15:52 a game
#24 · Center · 3 P in 4 GP (1 G, 2 A)
- L1 · Benn, Robertson
- PP1
- Preventing chancesTop 10
- FaceoffsTop 10
- Power-play chancestop 6%
- Takeawaysbottom 1%
- Power-play chancestop 24%
- Fast burststop 8%
- Distance skatedtop 12%
23:00 a game
#55 · Defenseman · 1 P in 4 GP (0 G, 1 A)
- Most ice time
- P1 · Lundkvist
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- TakeawaysTop 10
- Shooting volumetop 21%
- Shot blockingtop 22%
- Drawing penaltiesbottom 5%
- Takeawaystop 21%
22:54 a game
#4 · Defenseman · 2 P in 4 GP (2 G, 0 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P3 · Lindell
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Preventing chancestop 11%
- Creating his own chancestop 16%
- Hittingbottom 3%
- Finishingtop 15%
- Drawing penaltiestop 17%
- Creating his own chancestop 21%
- Hittingbottom 17%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Stars players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (4 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
- L19:49 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 3.25
- Allows
- 2.05
- Share
- 61.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 44%
- L29:03 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.78
- Allows
- 2.20
- Share
- 55.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 29%
- L38:16 a gamein 2 of last 4
M. RantanenS. SteelW. Johnston
- Creates
- 2.76
- Allows
- 2.15
- Share
- 56.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 60%
- L45:56 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.51
- Allows
- 2.71
- Share
- 48.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- P113:51 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.72
- Allows
- 2.06
- Share
- 56.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 38%
- P212:34 a game
- Creates
- 2.35
- Allows
- 2.31
- Share
- 50.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 30%
- P312:05 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 3.08
- Allows
- 2.77
- Share
- 52.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 29%
Last game
At Buffalo Sabres, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Dallas group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Benn · Hintz · RobertsonOpp. L136%Opp. L227%Opp. L323%Opp. L414%
- L2Seguin · Hryckowian · HyryOpp. L129%Opp. L218%Opp. L328%Opp. L425%
- L3Rantanen · Steel · JohnstonOpp. L124%Opp. L236%Opp. L318%Opp. L421%
- L4Blackwell · Faksa · BäckOpp. L126%Opp. L229%Opp. L319%Opp. L427%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Lundkvist · HarleyOpp. L128%Opp. L226%Opp. L323%Opp. L423%
- P2Myers · BichselOpp. L131%Opp. L224%Opp. L319%Opp. L426%
- P3Lindell · HeiskanenOpp. L133%Opp. L233%Opp. L320%Opp. L413%
Standing out at home
- Benn, Hintz, Robertson (L1) have spent 52% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 38%.
- Myers, Bichsel (P2) have spent 32% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 22%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Benn · Hintz · RobertsonOpp. L152%Opp. L216%Opp. L39%Opp. L423%
- L2Seguin · Hryckowian · HyryOpp. L130%Opp. L216%Opp. L335%Opp. L420%
- L3Rantanen · Steel · JohnstonOpp. L140%Opp. L228%Opp. L39%Opp. L422%
- L4Blackwell · Faksa · BäckOpp. L125%Opp. L235%Opp. L315%Opp. L426%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Lundkvist · HarleyOpp. L138%Opp. L223%Opp. L319%Opp. L420%
- P2Myers · BichselOpp. L128%Opp. L223%Opp. L317%Opp. L432%
- P3Lindell · HeiskanenOpp. L158%Opp. L218%Opp. L313%Opp. L411%
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Benn · Hintz · RobertsonOpp. L126%Opp. L234%Opp. L332%Opp. L48%
- L2Seguin · Hryckowian · HyryOpp. L129%Opp. L220%Opp. L323%Opp. L428%
- L3Rantanen · Steel · JohnstonOpp. L114%Opp. L241%Opp. L324%Opp. L421%
- L4Blackwell · Faksa · BäckOpp. L126%Opp. L225%Opp. L321%Opp. L428%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Lundkvist · HarleyOpp. L120%Opp. L228%Opp. L326%Opp. L426%
- P2Myers · BichselOpp. L133%Opp. L225%Opp. L320%Opp. L422%
- P3Lindell · HeiskanenOpp. L124%Opp. L238%Opp. L323%Opp. L414%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Dallas group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Dallas, every Dallas group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Dallas sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (4 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP173% of the time
Creates 9.2 expected goals per 60
- M. HeiskanenQuarterback
- M. Rantanenboth unitsDistributor
- J. Robertson
- W. JohnstonTrigger
- R. HintzNet-front
PP227% of the time
Creates 6.8 expected goals per 60
- T. HarleyQuarterback
- M. Rantanenboth unitsTrigger
- J. HryckowianNet-front
- T. SeguinNet-front
- J. Benn
Penalty kill
Kills allow 6.8 expected goals per 60, 5th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 3.4 expected goals per 60, 1st of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- R. Faksa11 of 11 kills · 0:55 a kill · takes the draw
- O. Bäck10 of 11 kills · 0:58 a kill
- E. LindellD10 of 11 kills · 1:16 a kill
- M. HeiskanenD10 of 11 kills · 1:11 a kill
Second wave
- A. Hyry9 of 11 kills · 0:46 a kill
- S. Steel11 of 11 kills · 0:38 a kill
- J. Hryckowian8 of 11 kills · 0:22 a kill
- T. HarleyD10 of 11 kills · 0:52 a kill
- T. MyersD9 of 11 kills · 0:39 a kill
- L. BichselD7 of 11 kills · 0:35 a kill
Spot duty
- J. Kiviranta4 of 11 kills · 0:39 a kill
- W. Johnston3 of 11 kills · 0:47 a kill
- R. Hintz3 of 11 kills · 0:46 a kill
- C. Blackwell4 of 11 kills · 0:26 a kill
- N. LundkvistD3 of 11 kills · 0:50 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
J. Oettinger55 starts · 1433 shots faced, this season and last
+12.3 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .977 755 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .861 476 shots
- High-danger save %
- .718 202 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.36
- Quality starts
- 62%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. OettingerHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+12.3 goals saved above expected in 55 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
25.5 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.0% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.36 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 80 seconds between shots; 25% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 62% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 15%
- Overall save %
- .902
J. Oettinger3 starts · 61 shots faced, this season
+4.5 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 35 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- 1.000 18 shots
- High-danger save %
- .750 8 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 20.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. OettingerHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+4.5 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
20.5 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.1% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots; 31% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .967
C. DeSmith31 starts · 786 shots faced, this season and last
+9.9 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .968 410 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .886 264 shots
- High-danger save %
- .732 112 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 26
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.46
- Quality starts
- 65%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for C. DeSmithHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+9.9 goals saved above expected in 31 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
26 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.9% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.46 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 80 seconds between shots; 24% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 65% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 19%
- Overall save %
- .907
C. DeSmith1 start · 26 shots faced, this season
+0.1 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- .929 14 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- 1.000 9 shots
- High-danger save %
- .667 3 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 26.7
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for C. DeSmithHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+0.1 goals saved above expected in 1 starttoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
26.7 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 5.4% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots; 23% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .923
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Dallas’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: more of Dallas’s goals come from the power play; fewer from empty nets and turnovers.
- Everyday even-strength play52.7%157 of 298
- Power play26.5%79 of 298
- Rebound7%21 of 298
- Empty net4%12 of 298
- Off a turnover2%6 of 298
- Goalie pulled3.7%11 of 298
- Shorthanded1.3%4 of 298
- Off a faceoff win2.7%8 of 298
298 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of Dallas’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play80%8 of 10
- Power play10%1 of 10
- Rebound0%0 of 10
- Empty net0%0 of 10
- Off a turnover10%1 of 10
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 10
- Shorthanded0%0 of 10
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 10
10 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: fewer of the goals Dallas allows come from turnovers.
- Everyday even-strength play54.6%137 of 251
- Power play21.9%55 of 251
- Rebound6.8%17 of 251
- Empty net7.6%19 of 251
- Off a turnover2.4%6 of 251
- Goalie pulled2.8%7 of 251
- Shorthanded2.8%7 of 251
- Off a faceoff win1.2%3 of 251
251 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Dallas allows come from empty nets; fewer from everyday even-strength play.
- Everyday even-strength play16.7%1 of 6
- Power play33.3%2 of 6
- Rebound16.7%1 of 6
- Empty net33.3%2 of 6
- Off a turnover0%0 of 6
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 6
- Shorthanded0%0 of 6
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 6
6 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.