Florida Panthers
2-0-2
All Panthers playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Florida plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 4 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 4 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
58.1 shot attempts per 6011th of 32
58.5 shot attempts per 6010th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot26th of 32
a 5.7% chance of scoring on the average shot24th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.2% of chances come from rebounds18th of 32
6.7% of chances come from rebounds23rd of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.2% of chances come right after a turnover22nd of 32
2.5% of chances come right after a turnover30th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
31.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen30th of 32
32.5% of shot attempts come from defensemen22nd of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
29.5% of shots come from within 20 feet25th of 32
24.3% of shots come from within 20 feet32nd of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
50.0 shot attempts allowed per 602nd of 32
39.8 shot attempts allowed per 601st of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 5.9% chance of scoring on the average shot against1st of 32
a 4.2% chance of scoring on the average shot against1st of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.36 defensive breakdowns per 601st of 32
0.00 defensive breakdowns per 601st of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.04 goals saved above expected per 6028th of 32
+0.56 goals saved above expected per 6010th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
78.7 shots per 60, both teams combined27th of 32
64.6 shots per 60, both teams combined32nd of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 151 (100 is league average)1st of 3233.6 forecheck plays recorded per 601st of 32
forecheck score 179 (100 is league average)1st of 3242.2 forecheck plays recorded per 601st of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 148 (100 is league average)1st of 3237.5 hits recorded per 601st of 32
hit score 174 (100 is league average)1st of 3247.2 hits recorded per 601st of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
40.9% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six24th of 32
40.2% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six28th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
7.9 expected goals per 60 on the power play8th of 32
7.5 expected goals per 60 on the power play12th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
6.8 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded4th of 32
9.1 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded27th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
1.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded8th of 32
0.4 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded22nd of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.03 more penalties drawn than taken per 6014th of 32
0.95 more penalties drawn than taken per 605th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Florida leans on, and what they do best.

- Most ice time
- L3 · Marchand, Tkachuk
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Power-play chancestop 22%
- Creating his own chancesbottom 25%

- 2nd in ice time
- L1 · Verhaeghe, Bennett
- PP1
- Distance skatedbottom 4%

- L1 · Verhaeghe, Tkachuk
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Setting up goalstop 12%
- Hittingtop 23%
- Distance skatedtop 9%
- Shot blockingbottom 22%

- L2 · Luostarinen, Vilmanis
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Distance skatedtop 14%

- Most ice time
- P1 · Mikkola
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Top speedTop 10
- Fast burststop 9%
- Shot blockingbottom 22%

- 2nd in ice time
- P2 · Kulikov
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Top speedTop 10
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Panthers players.
OutNobody reported out.
Show the full roster · 27 playersHide the full roster
Forwards
- 13Sam ReinhartC4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 21:58
- 19Matthew TkachukLW4 GP · 2 G · 1 A · 21:40
- 9Sam BennettC4 GP · 0 G · 3 A · 20:20
- 15Anton LundellC4 GP · 0 G · 1 A · 19:00
- 23Carter VerhaegheC4 GP · 1 G · 1 A · 18:25
- 8Brady TkachukLW4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 17:21
- 27Eetu LuostarinenC4 GP · 2 G · 0 A · 15:35
- 16Aleksander BarkovC2 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 14:54
- 20Lars EllerC4 GP · 0 G · 3 A · 12:45
- 95Sandis VilmanisLW4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 12:17
- 63Brad MarchandLW2 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 11:23
- 21Garnet HathawayRW4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 8:16
- 14Bokondji ImamaLW4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 6:20
- Cole SchwindtRWOff the NHL roster
- 12Jonah GadjovichLW
- 18Sam LaffertyC
Defense
- 3Seth JonesD4 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 27:42
- 42Gustav ForslingD3 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 21:29
- 5Aaron EkbladD2 GP · 0 G · 1 A · 20:55
- 77Niko MikkolaD4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 20:40
- 7Dmitry KulikovD4 GP · 0 G · 1 A · 16:22
- 26Uvis BalinskisD3 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 13:55
- 6Radko GudasD4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 13:03
- Alexander PetrovicDOff the NHL roster
- Donovan SebrangoDOff the NHL roster
Goalies
- 40Akira SchmidG1 GP · .875
- 25Jacob MarkstromG3 GP · .927
Regulars here last season whom no NHL club lists now: Jeff Petry, Luke Kunin, Tomas Nosek.
As of Oct. 10. Injury details come from the NHL.com Status Report when it names a player; otherwise we only say what the rosters show.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (4 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
- L110:14 a game
C. VerhaegheS. BennettM. Tkachuk
- Creates
- 3.14
- Allows
- 2.07
- Share
- 60.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 59%
- L27:54 a game
E. LuostarinenA. LundellS. Vilmanis
- Creates
- 3.14
- Allows
- 2.03
- Share
- 60.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- L36:50 a gamein 2 of last 4
B. MarchandS. ReinhartB. Tkachuk
- Creates
- 2.58
- Allows
- 2.18
- Share
- 54.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 75%
- L44:46 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.33
- Allows
- 2.38
- Share
- 49.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 86%
- P113:43 a game
- Creates
- 2.44
- Allows
- 1.78
- Share
- 57.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 67%
- P212:48 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.50
- Allows
- 2.26
- Share
- 52.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 45%
- P39:33 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.89
- Allows
- 2.43
- Share
- 54.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 75%
Last game
At Los Angeles Kings, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Florida group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Eller, Hathaway, Imama (L4) have spent 19% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 7%.
- Luostarinen, Lundell, Vilmanis (L2) have spent 48% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 38%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Verhaeghe · Bennett · TkachukOpp. L134%Opp. L236%Opp. L324%Opp. L46%
- L2Luostarinen · Lundell · VilmanisOpp. L148%Opp. L211%Opp. L337%Opp. L44%
- L3Marchand · Reinhart · TkachukOpp. L131%Opp. L235%Opp. L330%Opp. L44%
- L4Eller · Hathaway · ImamaOpp. L142%Opp. L219%Opp. L321%Opp. L419%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Jones · MikkolaOpp. L138%Opp. L232%Opp. L326%Opp. L45%
- P2Kulikov · ForslingOpp. L141%Opp. L225%Opp. L327%Opp. L47%
- P3Gudas · BalinskisOpp. L130%Opp. L221%Opp. L336%Opp. L413%
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Verhaeghe · Bennett · TkachukOpp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
- L2Luostarinen · Lundell · VilmanisOpp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
- L3Marchand · Reinhart · TkachukOpp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
- L4Eller · Hathaway · ImamaOpp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Jones · MikkolaOpp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
- P2Kulikov · ForslingOpp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
- P3Gudas · BalinskisOpp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
Standing out on the road
- Eller, Hathaway, Imama (L4) have spent 19% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 7%.
- Luostarinen, Lundell, Vilmanis (L2) have spent 48% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 38%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Verhaeghe · Bennett · TkachukOpp. L134%Opp. L236%Opp. L324%Opp. L46%
- L2Luostarinen · Lundell · VilmanisOpp. L148%Opp. L211%Opp. L337%Opp. L44%
- L3Marchand · Reinhart · TkachukOpp. L131%Opp. L235%Opp. L330%Opp. L44%
- L4Eller · Hathaway · ImamaOpp. L142%Opp. L219%Opp. L321%Opp. L419%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Jones · MikkolaOpp. L138%Opp. L232%Opp. L326%Opp. L45%
- P2Kulikov · ForslingOpp. L141%Opp. L225%Opp. L327%Opp. L47%
- P3Gudas · BalinskisOpp. L130%Opp. L221%Opp. L336%Opp. L413%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Florida group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Florida, every Florida group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Florida sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (4 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP168% of the time
Creates 7.3 expected goals per 60
- S. JonesQuarterback
- M. Tkachukboth unitsDistributor
- S. ReinhartTrigger
- B. Tkachuk
- S. Bennettboth units
PP232% of the time
Creates 7.3 expected goals per 60
- A. EkbladQuarterback
- M. Tkachukboth unitsDistributor
- S. Bennettboth unitsTrigger
- A. LundellNet-front
- C. Verhaeghe
Penalty kill
Kills allow 6.8 expected goals per 60, 4th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 9.1 expected goals per 60, 27th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- L. Eller11 of 14 kills · 0:59 a kill · takes the draw
- G. Hathaway11 of 14 kills · 0:50 a kill
- N. MikkolaD12 of 14 kills · 0:59 a kill
- G. ForslingD7 of 14 kills · 1:35 a kill
- S. JonesD11 of 14 kills · 0:57 a kill
- A. EkbladD8 of 14 kills · 1:04 a kill
Second wave
- A. Lundell12 of 14 kills · 0:49 a kill
- E. Luostarinen10 of 14 kills · 0:41 a kill
- S. Reinhart8 of 14 kills · 0:34 a kill
- D. KulikovD9 of 14 kills · 0:38 a kill
- R. GudasD8 of 14 kills · 0:28 a kill
Spot duty
- A. Barkov3 of 14 kills · 0:46 a kill
- B. Marchand2 of 14 kills · 0:34 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
J. Markstrom45 starts · 1168 shots faced, this season and last
−7.9 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .972 601 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .848 414 shots
- High-danger save %
- .647 153 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.6
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.24
- Quality starts
- 42%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. MarkstromHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−7.9 goals saved above expected in 45 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
25.6 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.1% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.24 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 74 seconds between shots; 23% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 42% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 27%
- Overall save %
- .885
J. Markstrom3 starts · 55 shots faced, this season
+2.8 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 23 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .900 20 shots
- High-danger save %
- .833 12 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 17.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 67%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. MarkstromHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+2.8 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
17.5 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 8.0% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots; 31% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 67% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .927
A. Schmid35 starts · 823 shots faced, this season and last
−4.6 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .962 447 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .875 273 shots
- High-danger save %
- .631 103 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 24.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.38
- Quality starts
- 46%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for A. SchmidHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−4.6 goals saved above expected in 35 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
24.3 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.3% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.38 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 92 seconds between shots; 25% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 46% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 20%
- Overall save %
- .892
A. Schmid1 start · 32 shots faced, this season
−0.5 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .929 14 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- 1.000 13 shots
- High-danger save %
- .400 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 30.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 0%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for A. SchmidHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−0.5 goals saved above expected in 1 starttoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
30.4 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.2% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 88 seconds between shots; 19% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 0% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .875
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Florida’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
Every row of Florida’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play54.3%138 of 254
- Power play20.5%52 of 254
- Rebound7.5%19 of 254
- Empty net5.5%14 of 254
- Off a turnover4.3%11 of 254
- Goalie pulled3.9%10 of 254
- Shorthanded2.4%6 of 254
- Off a faceoff win1.6%4 of 254
254 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of Florida’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play62.5%5 of 8
- Power play12.5%1 of 8
- Rebound12.5%1 of 8
- Empty net0%0 of 8
- Off a turnover0%0 of 8
- Goalie pulled12.5%1 of 8
- Shorthanded0%0 of 8
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 8
8 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: fewer of the goals Florida allows come from everyday even-strength play.
- Everyday even-strength play50.4%142 of 282
- Power play19.9%56 of 282
- Rebound8.2%23 of 282
- Empty net8.2%23 of 282
- Off a turnover6.4%18 of 282
- Goalie pulled2.5%7 of 282
- Shorthanded2.1%6 of 282
- Off a faceoff win2.5%7 of 282
282 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Florida allows come from the power play; fewer from everyday even-strength play.
- Everyday even-strength play25%2 of 8
- Power play50%4 of 8
- Rebound0%0 of 8
- Empty net0%0 of 8
- Off a turnover12.5%1 of 8
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 8
- Shorthanded12.5%1 of 8
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 8
8 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.