Los Angeles Kings
0-2-1
All Kings playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Los Angeles plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 3 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 3 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
57.9 shot attempts per 6012th of 32
54.2 shot attempts per 6020th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 5.8% chance of scoring on the average shot31st of 32
a 5.8% chance of scoring on the average shot23rd of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.0% of chances come from rebounds27th of 32
9.3% of chances come from rebounds17th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
6.6% of chances come right after a turnover32nd of 32
12.5% of chances come right after a turnover6th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
29.4% of shot attempts come from defensemen32nd of 32
28.1% of shot attempts come from defensemen32nd of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
30.3% of shots come from within 20 feet20th of 32
33.0% of shots come from within 20 feet15th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
56.1 shot attempts allowed per 6016th of 32
55.6 shot attempts allowed per 6017th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 5.9% chance of scoring on the average shot against3rd of 32
a 5.6% chance of scoring on the average shot against3rd of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.40 defensive breakdowns per 6012th of 32
0.44 defensive breakdowns per 6017th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.03 goals saved above expected per 6029th of 32
−2.40 goals saved above expected per 6032nd of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
81.7 shots per 60, both teams combined15th of 32
79.2 shots per 60, both teams combined18th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 106 (100 is league average)10th of 3223.2 forecheck plays recorded per 6012th of 32
forecheck score 117 (100 is league average)8th of 3227.3 forecheck plays recorded per 609th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 85 (100 is league average)26th of 3221.9 hits recorded per 6029th of 32
hit score 75 (100 is league average)27th of 3220.2 hits recorded per 6030th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
40.1% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six32nd of 32
39.2% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six32nd of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
7.0 expected goals per 60 on the power play25th of 32
6.4 expected goals per 60 on the power play21st of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
7.3 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded9th of 32
7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded19th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
1.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded9th of 32
2.3 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded3rd of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.06 more penalties taken than drawn per 6021st of 32
0.33 more penalties taken than drawn per 6022nd of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Los Angeles leans on, and what they do best.
21:02 a game
#9 · Right wing · 2 P in 3 GP (1 G, 1 A)
- Most ice time
- L1 · Panarin, Byfield
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Finishingtop 4%
- Shooting volumetop 11%
- Top speedtop 4%
- Shot blockingbottom 8%
- Power-play chancestop 25%
- Hardest shottop 7%
- Distance skatedtop 9%
21:01 a game
#10 · Left wing · 3 P in 3 GP (2 G, 1 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L1 · Kempe, Byfield
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Creating chancestop 16%
- Shooting volumetop 22%
- Shot blockingbottom 1%
- Hardest shottop 8%
- Hittingbottom 23%
20:56 a game
#55 · Right wing · 2 P in 3 GP (1 G, 1 A)
- L1 · Kempe, Panarin
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Takeaways1st
- Creating chancestop 10%
- Distance skatedtop 6%
- Hittingbottom 14%
- TakeawaysTop 5
- Faceoffstop 9%
- Fast burststop 9%
- Hittingbottom 23%
18:11 a game
#36 · Right wing · 1 P in 3 GP (0 G, 1 A)
- L2 · Turcotte, Laferriere
- PP1
- Setting up goalstop 13%
- Hittingbottom 3%
- Hittingbottom 14%
19:53 a game
#8 · Defenseman · 1 P in 3 GP (0 G, 1 A)
- Most ice time
- P2 · Dumoulin
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Preventing chancesTop 10
- Creating his own chancesbottom 4%
No clear strengths or weak spots yet.
19:39 a game
#92 · Defenseman · 2 P in 3 GP (0 G, 2 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P1 · Gustafsson
- PP1
- Setting up goalsTop 5
- Shot blockingTop 10
- Drawing penaltiesTop 10
- Hittingbottom 7%
- Top speedtop 6%
- Fast burststop 11%
- Staying out of the boxbottom 17%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Kings players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (3 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
- L111:12 a game
- Creates
- 3.18
- Allows
- 2.14
- Share
- 59.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 77%
- L210:32 a gamein 2 of last 3
M. ZuccarelloA. TurcotteA. Laferriere
- Creates
- 2.73
- Allows
- 2.08
- Share
- 56.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 69%
- L310:05 a gamein 1 of last 3
- Creates
- 2.40
- Allows
- 2.30
- Share
- 51.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 33%
- P19:00 a gamein 2 of last 3
- Creates
- 2.64
- Allows
- 2.11
- Share
- 55.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 81%
- P28:28 a game
- Creates
- 2.51
- Allows
- 2.79
- Share
- 47.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 40%
- P38:16 a game
- Creates
- 2.59
- Allows
- 2.67
- Share
- 49.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 15%
Last game
Against Florida Panthers, these groups were different from the usual
- L2: J. Armia · S. Laughton · T. Moore (4:40)
- L3: E. Haula · M. Zuccarello · A. Laferriere (4:39)
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Los Angeles group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Kempe, Panarin, Byfield (L1) have spent 40% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 29%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Kempe · Panarin · ByfieldOpp. L119%Opp. L240%Opp. L323%Opp. L418%
- L2Zuccarello · Turcotte · LaferriereOpp. L138%Opp. L218%Opp. L331%Opp. L413%
- L3Haula · Armia · MooreOpp. L138%Opp. L227%Opp. L325%Opp. L410%
- L4Opp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Gustafsson · ClarkeOpp. L129%Opp. L233%Opp. L322%Opp. L416%
- P2Doughty · DumoulinOpp. L134%Opp. L222%Opp. L326%Opp. L417%
- P3Ceci · AndersonOpp. L122%Opp. L231%Opp. L335%Opp. L412%
Standing out at home
- Gustafsson, Clarke (P1) have spent 38% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 26%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Kempe · Panarin · ByfieldOpp. L126%Opp. L212%Opp. L337%Opp. L425%
- L2Zuccarello · Turcotte · LaferriereOpp. L139%Opp. L217%Opp. L326%Opp. L418%
- L3Haula · Armia · MooreOpp. L139%Opp. L243%Opp. L311%Opp. L47%
- L4Opp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Gustafsson · ClarkeOpp. L118%Opp. L238%Opp. L327%Opp. L418%
- P2Doughty · DumoulinOpp. L146%Opp. L212%Opp. L330%Opp. L412%
- P3Ceci · AndersonOpp. L136%Opp. L226%Opp. L320%Opp. L418%
Standing out on the road
- Kempe, Panarin, Byfield (L1) have spent 50% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 31%.
- Ceci, Anderson (P3) have spent 41% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 28%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Kempe · Panarin · ByfieldOpp. L116%Opp. L250%Opp. L318%Opp. L416%
- L2Zuccarello · Turcotte · LaferriereOpp. L138%Opp. L218%Opp. L333%Opp. L411%
- L3Haula · Armia · MooreOpp. L138%Opp. L220%Opp. L331%Opp. L411%
- L4Opp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Gustafsson · ClarkeOpp. L135%Opp. L230%Opp. L320%Opp. L415%
- P2Doughty · DumoulinOpp. L130%Opp. L225%Opp. L325%Opp. L419%
- P3Ceci · AndersonOpp. L117%Opp. L233%Opp. L341%Opp. L410%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Los Angeles group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Los Angeles, every Los Angeles group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Los Angeles sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (3 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP170% of the time
Creates 7.3 expected goals per 60
- B. ClarkeQuarterback
- A. Panarinboth unitsDistributor
- Q. Byfield
- A. KempeTrigger
- M. Zuccarello
PP230% of the time
Creates 6.4 expected goals per 60
- D. DoughtyQuarterback
- A. Panarinboth unitsDistributor
- A. Turcotte
- A. LaferriereTrigger
- E. Haula
Penalty kill
Kills allow 7.3 expected goals per 60, 9th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 7.4 expected goals per 60, 19th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- J. Armia9 of 10 kills · 0:58 a kill
- E. Haula9 of 10 kills · 0:57 a kill · takes the draw
- C. CeciD10 of 10 kills · 1:04 a kill
- M. AndersonD9 of 10 kills · 1:02 a kill
Second wave
- S. Laughton10 of 10 kills · 0:48 a kill · takes the draw
- T. Moore10 of 10 kills · 0:48 a kill
- A. Turcotte4 of 10 kills · 0:38 a kill
- A. Laferriere4 of 10 kills · 0:28 a kill
- D. DoughtyD7 of 10 kills · 1:00 a kill
- B. DumoulinD7 of 10 kills · 0:52 a kill
- J. EdmundsonD7 of 10 kills · 0:52 a kill
Spot duty
- A. Kempe3 of 10 kills · 0:26 a kill
- Q. Byfield3 of 10 kills · 0:25 a kill
- B. ClarkeD3 of 10 kills · 0:32 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
D. Kuemper49 starts · 1293 shots faced, this season and last
−6.8 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .969 635 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .857 476 shots
- High-danger save %
- .692 182 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.8
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.36
- Quality starts
- 51%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for D. KuemperHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−6.8 goals saved above expected in 49 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
25.8 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.0% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.36 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 77 seconds between shots; 22% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 51% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 22%
- Overall save %
- .889
D. Kuemper2 starts · 59 shots faced, this season
−3.9 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .969 32 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .667 18 shots
- High-danger save %
- .667 9 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 30.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.51
- Quality starts
- 50%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for D. KuemperHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−3.9 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
30.2 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.5% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.51 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 72 seconds between shots; 15% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 50% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 50%
- Overall save %
- .831
A. Forsberg35 starts · 978 shots faced, this season and last
+5.9 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .978 538 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .848 310 shots
- High-danger save %
- .746 130 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.4
- Quality starts
- 63%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for A. ForsbergHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+5.9 goals saved above expected in 35 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
28 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.5% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.4 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 74 seconds between shots; 22% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 63% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 20%
- Overall save %
- .906
A. Forsberg1 start · 25 shots faced, this season
−3.3 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- .857 14 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .800 10 shots
- High-danger save %
- .000 1 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 23.9
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 0%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for A. ForsbergHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−3.3 goals saved above expected in 1 starttoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
23.9 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 4.9% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots; 28% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 0% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 100%
- Overall save %
- .800
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Los Angeles’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: more of Los Angeles’s goals come from everyday even-strength play and play with the goalie pulled; fewer from rebounds.
- Everyday even-strength play61.5%144 of 234
- Power play17.1%40 of 234
- Rebound4.7%11 of 234
- Empty net4.3%10 of 234
- Off a turnover3.8%9 of 234
- Goalie pulled4.3%10 of 234
- Shorthanded3.4%8 of 234
- Off a faceoff win0.9%2 of 234
234 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of Los Angeles’s goals come from shorthanded play.
- Everyday even-strength play33.3%3 of 9
- Power play22.2%2 of 9
- Rebound0%0 of 9
- Empty net0%0 of 9
- Off a turnover11.1%1 of 9
- Goalie pulled11.1%1 of 9
- Shorthanded22.2%2 of 9
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 9
9 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Los Angeles allows come from the power play; fewer from rebounds.
- Everyday even-strength play54.1%144 of 266
- Power play24.4%65 of 266
- Rebound4.5%12 of 266
- Empty net6%16 of 266
- Off a turnover3.8%10 of 266
- Goalie pulled3%8 of 266
- Shorthanded2.6%7 of 266
- Off a faceoff win1.5%4 of 266
266 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals Los Angeles allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play53.3%8 of 15
- Power play33.3%5 of 15
- Rebound6.7%1 of 15
- Empty net0%0 of 15
- Off a turnover6.7%1 of 15
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 15
- Shorthanded0%0 of 15
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 15
15 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.