New York Islanders
2-2-0
All Islanders playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How NY Islanders plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 4 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 4 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
52.2 shot attempts per 6026th of 32
48.8 shot attempts per 6027th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot15th of 32
a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot11th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.5% of chances come from rebounds6th of 32
6.7% of chances come from rebounds24th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
6.9% of chances come right after a turnover27th of 32
12.8% of chances come right after a turnover5th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
37.3% of shot attempts come from defensemen3rd of 32
34.5% of shot attempts come from defensemen16th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
30.7% of shots come from within 20 feet14th of 32
35.5% of shots come from within 20 feet6th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
58.2 shot attempts allowed per 6021st of 32
57.0 shot attempts allowed per 6021st of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot against20th of 32
a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against9th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.48 defensive breakdowns per 6031st of 32
0.67 defensive breakdowns per 6024th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.21 goals saved above expected per 603rd of 32
+1.51 goals saved above expected per 602nd of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
81.7 shots per 60, both teams combined16th of 32
76.9 shots per 60, both teams combined23rd of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 92 (100 is league average)23rd of 3221.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6020th of 32
forecheck score 86 (100 is league average)21st of 3222.0 forecheck plays recorded per 6021st of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 102 (100 is league average)15th of 3227.0 hits recorded per 6016th of 32
hit score 106 (100 is league average)12th of 3231.4 hits recorded per 6012th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
44.5% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six1st of 32
46.1% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six1st of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
6.7 expected goals per 60 on the power play29th of 32
5.9 expected goals per 60 on the power play24th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
8.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded30th of 32
8.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded25th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
2.5 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.11 more penalties drawn than taken per 608th of 32
0.25 more penalties taken than drawn per 6019th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who NY Islanders leans on, and what they do best.

- Most ice time
- L1 · Palmieri, Heineman
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Shooting volumetop 6%
- Creating his own chancestop 7%
- Creating chancestop 7%
- Shot blockingbottom 21%

- 2nd in ice time
- L3 · Pageau, Duclair
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- Hardest shottop 14%

- L1 · Palmieri, Horvat
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Takeawaystop 23%

- L1 · Horvat, Heineman
- PP1
- Power-play chancestop 11%
- Finishingbottom 11%
- Hardest shotTop 10
- Hittingbottom 21%

- Most ice time
- P1 · Stanley
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Takeaways2nd
- Shorthanded threatTop 10
- Drawing penaltiesTop 10
- Hittingbottom 12%
- Takeawaystop 5%
- Top speed1st
- Fast bursts1st
- Hittingbottom 25%

- 2nd in ice time
- P2 · Pulock
- Kills penalties
No clear strengths or weak spots yet.
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Islanders players.
OutMathew Barzal day to day
Show the full roster · 24 playersHide the full roster
Forwards
- 14Bo HorvatC4 GP · 4 G · 1 A · 19:11
- 92Simon HolmstromRW4 GP · 1 G · 1 A · 16:58
- 51Emil HeinemanLW4 GP · 2 G · 0 A · 15:50
- 21Kyle PalmieriC4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 15:49
- 63Matias MaccelliLW4 GP · 0 G · 2 A · 15:26
- 10Brayden SchennC4 GP · 1 G · 3 A · 15:15
- 44Jean-Gabriel PageauC4 GP · 0 G · 2 A · 14:42
- 64Calum RitchieC4 GP · 1 G · 1 A · 14:31
- 38Victor EklundRW4 GP · 1 G · 1 A · 13:20
- 53Casey CizikasC4 GP · 1 G · 1 A · 12:53
- 11Anthony DuclairLW4 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 12:42
- 81Ondrej PalatLW4 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 11:46
- Mathew BarzalCDay to day
- 32Kyle MacLeanC
Defense
- 48Matthew SchaeferD4 GP · 0 G · 3 A · 25:02
- 3Adam PelechD4 GP · 0 G · 2 A · 20:29
- 8Logan StanleyD4 GP · 0 G · 4 A · 19:22
- 6Ryan PulockD4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 17:44
- 77Tony DeAngeloD4 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 16:42
- 28Alexander RomanovD3 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 16:34
- 24Scott MayfieldD1 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 12:32
- 4Matthew KesselD
Goalies
- 30Ilya SorokinG3 GP · .965
- 40Semyon VarlamovG1 GP · .864
Regulars here last season whom no NHL club lists now: Adam Boqvist, Jonathan Drouin.
As of Oct. 10. Injury details come from the NHL.com Status Report when it names a player; otherwise we only say what the rosters show.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (4 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Worth knowing
- M. Barzal is day to day and has not played this season. He is one of their most valuable skaters. V. Eklund has taken his spot beside B. Schenn and C. Ritchie.
- K. Palmieri is no longer killing penalties: 0% of the team’s shorthanded time in 4 games, down from 37% last season.
- L19:17 a gamein 3 of last 4
K. PalmieriB. HorvatE. Heineman
- Creates
- 3.05
- Allows
- 2.39
- Share
- 56.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 35%
- L29:02 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 3.22
- Allows
- 2.40
- Share
- 57.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 48%
- L38:54 a gamein 3 of last 4
J. PageauA. DuclairS. Holmstrom
- Creates
- 2.13
- Allows
- 2.43
- Share
- 46.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 48%
- L47:08 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.49
- Allows
- 2.46
- Share
- 50.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 27%
- P1New15:03 last game
- Creates
- 2.51
- Allows
- 2.17
- Share
- 53.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- P2New11:01 last game
- Creates
- 2.56
- Allows
- 2.45
- Share
- 51.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 46%
- P3New7:35 last game
- Creates
- 2.70
- Allows
- 2.73
- Share
- 49.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
Last game
Against Chicago Blackhawks, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each NY Islanders group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Palmieri, Horvat, Heineman (L1) have spent 40% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 27%.
- Pageau, Duclair, Holmstrom (L3) have spent 40% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 27%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Palmieri · Horvat · HeinemanOpp. L130%Opp. L240%Opp. L319%Opp. L411%
- L2Schenn · Ritchie · EklundOpp. L128%Opp. L217%Opp. L331%Opp. L423%
- L3Pageau · Duclair · HolmstromOpp. L118%Opp. L230%Opp. L340%Opp. L412%
- L4Cizikas · Palat · MaccelliOpp. L135%Opp. L222%Opp. L319%Opp. L424%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Stanley · SchaeferOpp. L125%Opp. L225%Opp. L331%Opp. L419%
- P2Pelech · PulockOpp. L133%Opp. L233%Opp. L314%Opp. L419%
- P3Mayfield · DeAngeloOpp. L169%Opp. L28%Opp. L317%Opp. L46%
Standing out at home
- Schenn, Ritchie, Eklund (L2) have spent 27% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 15%.
- Pelech, Pulock (P2) have spent 41% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 29%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Palmieri · Horvat · HeinemanOpp. L132%Opp. L230%Opp. L325%Opp. L414%
- L2Schenn · Ritchie · EklundOpp. L129%Opp. L216%Opp. L327%Opp. L427%
- L3Pageau · Duclair · HolmstromOpp. L121%Opp. L238%Opp. L333%Opp. L48%
- L4Cizikas · Palat · MaccelliOpp. L131%Opp. L233%Opp. L324%Opp. L412%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Stanley · SchaeferOpp. L122%Opp. L227%Opp. L334%Opp. L418%
- P2Pelech · PulockOpp. L127%Opp. L241%Opp. L318%Opp. L414%
- P3Mayfield · DeAngeloOpp. L175%Opp. L26%Opp. L314%Opp. L45%
Standing out on the road
- Palmieri, Horvat, Heineman (L1) have spent 52% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 25%.
- Cizikas, Palat, Maccelli (L4) have spent 37% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 20%.
- Cizikas, Palat, Maccelli (L4) have spent 41% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 28%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Palmieri · Horvat · HeinemanOpp. L129%Opp. L252%Opp. L312%Opp. L47%
- L2Schenn · Ritchie · EklundOpp. L127%Opp. L219%Opp. L336%Opp. L419%
- L3Pageau · Duclair · HolmstromOpp. L113%Opp. L217%Opp. L351%Opp. L419%
- L4Cizikas · Palat · MaccelliOpp. L141%Opp. L29%Opp. L314%Opp. L437%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Stanley · SchaeferOpp. L128%Opp. L223%Opp. L328%Opp. L421%
- P2Pelech · PulockOpp. L140%Opp. L225%Opp. L310%Opp. L425%
- P3Mayfield · DeAngeloOpp. L138%Opp. L217%Opp. L337%Opp. L48%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one NY Islanders group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against NY Islanders, every NY Islanders group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who NY Islanders sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (4 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP172% of the time
Creates 7.2 expected goals per 60
- M. SchaeferQuarterback
- M. Maccelli
- K. PalmieriNet-front
- B. HorvatTrigger
- B. Schenn
PP228% of the time
Creates 6.1 expected goals per 60
- T. DeAngeloQuarterback
- C. RitchieTrigger
- S. Holmstrom
- V. Eklund
- A. DuclairNet-front
Penalty kill
Kills allow 8.5 expected goals per 60, 30th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 8.5 expected goals per 60, 25th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- J. Pageau14 of 14 kills · 0:49 a kill · takes the draw
- S. Holmstrom14 of 14 kills · 0:45 a kill
- R. PulockD14 of 14 kills · 1:10 a kill
- A. PelechD14 of 14 kills · 1:07 a kill
Second wave
- E. Heineman14 of 14 kills · 0:47 a kill
- B. Horvat12 of 14 kills · 0:47 a kill
- C. Cizikas12 of 14 kills · 0:40 a kill
- O. Palat9 of 14 kills · 0:29 a kill
- L. StanleyD13 of 14 kills · 0:51 a kill
- A. RomanovD11 of 14 kills · 0:53 a kill
Spot duty
- S. MayfieldD2 of 14 kills · 0:51 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
I. Sorokin58 starts · 1616 shots faced, this season and last
+32.5 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .975 791 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .880 566 shots
- High-danger save %
- .772 259 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.42
- Quality starts
- 55%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for I. SorokinHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+32.5 goals saved above expected in 58 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
28.5 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.42 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots; 21% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 55% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 16%
- Overall save %
- .909
I. Sorokin3 starts · 86 shots faced, this season
+5.3 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 42 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .974 38 shots
- High-danger save %
- .667 6 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.34
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for I. SorokinHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+5.3 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
29 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.5% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 72 seconds between shots; 15% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .965
S. Varlamov1 start · 22 shots faced, this season and last
+0.6 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .875 8 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .800 10 shots
- High-danger save %
- 1.000 4 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 22.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.01
- Quality starts
- 0%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for S. VarlamovHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+0.6 goals saved above expected in 1 starttoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
22.2 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 9.6% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
1.01 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 38 seconds between shots; 27% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 0% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .864
S. Varlamov1 start · 22 shots faced, this season
+0.6 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .875 8 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .800 10 shots
- High-danger save %
- 1.000 4 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 22.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.01
- Quality starts
- 0%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for S. VarlamovHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+0.6 goals saved above expected in 1 starttoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
22.2 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 9.6% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
1.01 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 38 seconds between shots; 27% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 0% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .864
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How NY Islanders’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: more of NY Islanders’s goals come from play with the goalie pulled, shorthanded play and faceoff wins; fewer from empty nets and turnovers.
- Everyday even-strength play55.6%134 of 241
- Power play17.4%42 of 241
- Rebound6.6%16 of 241
- Empty net3.3%8 of 241
- Off a turnover2.5%6 of 241
- Goalie pulled6.2%15 of 241
- Shorthanded4.6%11 of 241
- Off a faceoff win3.7%9 of 241
241 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of NY Islanders’s goals come from shorthanded play.
- Everyday even-strength play46.2%6 of 13
- Power play23.1%3 of 13
- Rebound0%0 of 13
- Empty net7.7%1 of 13
- Off a turnover7.7%1 of 13
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 13
- Shorthanded15.4%2 of 13
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 13
13 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: fewer of the goals NY Islanders allows come from rebounds.
- Everyday even-strength play58.6%143 of 244
- Power play17.2%42 of 244
- Rebound4.5%11 of 244
- Empty net6.6%16 of 244
- Off a turnover4.5%11 of 244
- Goalie pulled3.7%9 of 244
- Shorthanded3.7%9 of 244
- Off a faceoff win1.2%3 of 244
244 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals NY Islanders allows come from empty nets; fewer from everyday even-strength play.
- Everyday even-strength play25%2 of 8
- Power play25%2 of 8
- Rebound0%0 of 8
- Empty net25%2 of 8
- Off a turnover12.5%1 of 8
- Goalie pulled12.5%1 of 8
- Shorthanded0%0 of 8
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 8
8 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.