New York Rangers
4-2-0
All Rangers playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How NY Rangers plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 6 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 6 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
51.0 shot attempts per 6028th of 32
49.0 shot attempts per 6026th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot14th of 32
a 7.3% chance of scoring on the average shot5th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.0% of chances come from rebounds24th of 32
6.4% of chances come from rebounds25th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.7% of chances come right after a turnover8th of 32
10.3% of chances come right after a turnover12th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
35.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen11th of 32
34.8% of shot attempts come from defensemen14th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
32.3% of shots come from within 20 feet3rd of 32
37.9% of shots come from within 20 feet1st of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
55.9 shot attempts allowed per 6014th of 32
53.1 shot attempts allowed per 6013th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against14th of 32
a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot against22nd of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.42 defensive breakdowns per 6022nd of 32
0.42 defensive breakdowns per 6016th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.21 goals saved above expected per 604th of 32
+1.15 goals saved above expected per 604th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
77.2 shots per 60, both teams combined31st of 32
70.0 shots per 60, both teams combined31st of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 121 (100 is league average)3rd of 3227.4 forecheck plays recorded per 604th of 32
forecheck score 118 (100 is league average)7th of 3229.1 forecheck plays recorded per 608th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 121 (100 is league average)2nd of 3232.0 hits recorded per 603rd of 32
hit score 115 (100 is league average)9th of 3233.5 hits recorded per 608th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
41.5% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six20th of 32
42.0% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six18th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
8.4 expected goals per 60 on the power play5th of 32
9.7 expected goals per 60 on the power play5th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
7.7 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded21st of 32
5.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded7th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded29th of 32
0.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded29th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.22 more penalties taken than drawn per 6030th of 32
0.50 more penalties taken than drawn per 6026th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who NY Rangers leans on, and what they do best.
20:24 a game
#93 · Center · 5 P in 6 GP (1 G, 4 A)
- Most ice time
- L1 · Lafrenière, Perreault
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Staying out of the boxTop 10
- Finishingtop 7%
- Faceoffstop 13%
- Drawing penaltiesbottom 5%
- Faceoffstop 17%
- Hardest shot3rd
- Fast burstsbottom 13%
19:04 a game
#13 · Left wing · 6 P in 6 GP (4 G, 2 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L1 · Zibanejad, Perreault
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Takeawaystop 7%
- Preventing chancestop 9%
- Takeawaystop 11%
- Drawing penaltiestop 19%
- Setting up goalstop 25%
17:51 a game
#10 · Center · 3 P in 6 GP (1 G, 2 A)
- L2 · Dorofeyev, Kartye
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Creating chancestop 12%
- Faceoffstop 18%
- Hardest shot2nd
- Shorthanded threatbottom 3%
- Hardest shot2nd
- Staying out of the boxbottom 14%
16:50 a game
#16 · Right wing · 3 P in 6 GP (1 G, 2 A)
- L2 · Miller, Kartye
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Staying out of the boxtop 14%
- Preventing chancestop 15%
- Hardest shottop 12%
- Drawing penaltiesbottom 16%
No clear strengths or weak spots yet.
21:29 a game
#23 · Defenseman · 5 P in 6 GP (0 G, 5 A)
- Most ice time
- P1 · Gavrikov
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Takeaways3rd
- Creating chancesTop 5
- Preventing chancestop 5%
- Power-play chancesbottom 6%
- Creating chancestop 21%
- Distance skatedbottom 13%
21:22 a game
#44 · Defenseman · 4 P in 6 GP (1 G, 3 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P1 · Fox
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Finishing2nd
- Top speedtop 12%
- Shorthanded threatbottom 3%
- Hardest shottop 15%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Rangers players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (6 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Worth knowing
- M. Robertson has not played this season. A. Smits is in his usual spot beside B. Schneider. That pair is getting 10:46 a game at 5-on-5, up from 6:09 with Robertson.
- S. Durzi has started killing penalties: on the ice for 44% of the team’s shorthanded time in 6 games, up from 7% last season.
- L111:21 a game
M. ZibanejadA. LafrenièreG. Perreault
- Creates
- 3.35
- Allows
- 2.25
- Share
- 59.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 67%
- L210:22 a gamein 3 of last 6
J. MillerP. DorofeyevT. Kartye
- Creates
- 3.04
- Allows
- 2.06
- Share
- 59.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 55%
- L38:12 a game
- Creates
- 2.33
- Allows
- 2.65
- Share
- 46.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 35%
- L46:40 a gamein 2 of last 6
O. BjorkstrandJ. ChmelarC. Beaudoin
- Creates
- 2.30
- Allows
- 2.63
- Share
- 46.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 33%
- P112:38 a game
- Creates
- 2.87
- Allows
- 2.37
- Share
- 54.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 57%
- P213:15 a game
- Creates
- 2.39
- Allows
- 2.90
- Share
- 45.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 30%
- P310:46 a game
- Creates
- 2.63
- Allows
- 2.67
- Share
- 49.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 45%
Last game
At Washington Capitals, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each NY Rangers group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Bjorkstrand, Chmelar, Beaudoin (L4) have spent 35% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 21%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Zibanejad · Lafrenière · PerreaultOpp. L140%Opp. L217%Opp. L320%Opp. L423%
- L2Miller · Dorofeyev · KartyeOpp. L138%Opp. L224%Opp. L325%Opp. L413%
- L3Tolvanen · Cuylle · LabaOpp. L120%Opp. L228%Opp. L330%Opp. L422%
- L4Bjorkstrand · Chmelar · BeaudoinOpp. L118%Opp. L222%Opp. L325%Opp. L435%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Gavrikov · FoxOpp. L136%Opp. L219%Opp. L329%Opp. L416%
- P2Pettersson · DurziOpp. L124%Opp. L224%Opp. L329%Opp. L422%
- P3Schneider · SmitsOpp. L126%Opp. L219%Opp. L330%Opp. L425%
Standing out at home
- Miller, Dorofeyev, Kartye (L2) have spent 42% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 29%.
- Tolvanen, Cuylle, Laba (L3) have spent 39% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 28%.
- Schneider, Smits (P3) have spent 28% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 17%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Zibanejad · Lafrenière · PerreaultOpp. L133%Opp. L223%Opp. L320%Opp. L424%
- L2Miller · Dorofeyev · KartyeOpp. L142%Opp. L226%Opp. L323%Opp. L49%
- L3Tolvanen · Cuylle · LabaOpp. L113%Opp. L239%Opp. L335%Opp. L413%
- L4Bjorkstrand · Chmelar · BeaudoinOpp. L124%Opp. L221%Opp. L318%Opp. L436%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Gavrikov · FoxOpp. L135%Opp. L224%Opp. L326%Opp. L415%
- P2Pettersson · DurziOpp. L125%Opp. L234%Opp. L326%Opp. L414%
- P3Schneider · SmitsOpp. L127%Opp. L222%Opp. L323%Opp. L428%
Standing out on the road
- Zibanejad, Lafrenière, Perreault (L1) have spent 50% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 35%.
- Tolvanen, Cuylle, Laba (L3) have spent 36% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 26%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Zibanejad · Lafrenière · PerreaultOpp. L150%Opp. L29%Opp. L321%Opp. L421%
- L2Miller · Dorofeyev · KartyeOpp. L133%Opp. L220%Opp. L327%Opp. L420%
- L3Tolvanen · Cuylle · LabaOpp. L130%Opp. L211%Opp. L323%Opp. L436%
- L4Bjorkstrand · Chmelar · BeaudoinOpp. L111%Opp. L222%Opp. L333%Opp. L434%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Gavrikov · FoxOpp. L138%Opp. L212%Opp. L333%Opp. L417%
- P2Pettersson · DurziOpp. L123%Opp. L210%Opp. L334%Opp. L433%
- P3Schneider · SmitsOpp. L124%Opp. L217%Opp. L337%Opp. L423%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one NY Rangers group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against NY Rangers, every NY Rangers group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who NY Rangers sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (6 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP170% of the time
Creates 8.6 expected goals per 60
- A. FoxQuarterback
- A. LafrenièreDistributor
- M. ZibanejadTrigger
- P. Dorofeyev
- J. MillerNet-front
PP229% of the time
Creates 7.6 expected goals per 60
- S. DurziQuarterback
- W. CuylleTrigger
- G. PerreaultDistributor
- E. Tolvanen
- O. Bjorkstrand
Penalty kill
Kills allow 7.7 expected goals per 60, 21st of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 5.5 expected goals per 60, 7th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- W. Cuylle15 of 18 kills · 0:41 a kill
- N. Laba15 of 18 kills · 0:40 a kill · takes the draw
- V. GavrikovD17 of 18 kills · 0:58 a kill
- B. SchneiderD16 of 18 kills · 0:56 a kill
Second wave
- T. Kartye17 of 18 kills · 0:44 a kill
- J. Veleno11 of 18 kills · 0:52 a kill · takes the draw
- E. Tolvanen15 of 18 kills · 0:32 a kill
- M. Zibanejad14 of 18 kills · 0:34 a kill · takes the draw
- J. Miller12 of 18 kills · 0:21 a kill
- M. PetterssonD15 of 18 kills · 0:58 a kill
- S. DurziD15 of 18 kills · 0:55 a kill
- A. FoxD8 of 18 kills · 0:30 a kill
Spot duty
- C. Beaudoin2 of 18 kills · 0:36 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
I. Shesterkin54 starts · 1534 shots faced, this season and last
+27.9 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .976 777 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .890 543 shots
- High-danger save %
- .743 214 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.33
- Quality starts
- 67%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for I. ShesterkinHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+27.9 goals saved above expected in 54 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
28 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.0% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.33 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 72 seconds between shots; 20% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 67% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 15%
- Overall save %
- .913
I. Shesterkin4 starts · 109 shots faced, this season
+4.7 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .978 45 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .918 49 shots
- High-danger save %
- .800 15 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 24.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for I. ShesterkinHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+4.7 goals saved above expected in 4 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
24.4 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.2% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 85 seconds between shots; 25% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .927
D. Garand5 starts · 130 shots faced, this season and last
+7.4 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- .987 75 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .971 34 shots
- High-danger save %
- .810 21 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.44
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for D. GarandHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+7.4 goals saved above expected in 5 startstoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
28.4 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.1% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.44 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 59 seconds between shots; 20% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .954
D. Garand2 starts · 34 shots faced, this season
+2.2 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 19 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- 1.000 9 shots
- High-danger save %
- .833 6 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 22.7
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.34
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for D. GarandHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+2.2 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
22.7 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.9% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
1.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 73 seconds between shots; 24% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .971
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How NY Rangers’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
Every row of NY Rangers’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play55%138 of 251
- Power play22.7%57 of 251
- Rebound6.8%17 of 251
- Empty net6.8%17 of 251
- Off a turnover3.2%8 of 251
- Goalie pulled2.4%6 of 251
- Shorthanded2%5 of 251
- Off a faceoff win1.2%3 of 251
251 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of NY Rangers’s goals come from empty nets; fewer from everyday even-strength play.
- Everyday even-strength play35.3%6 of 17
- Power play23.5%4 of 17
- Rebound5.9%1 of 17
- Empty net29.4%5 of 17
- Off a turnover5.9%1 of 17
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 17
- Shorthanded0%0 of 17
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 17
17 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals NY Rangers allows come from empty nets; fewer from turnovers and play with the goalie pulled.
- Everyday even-strength play53.1%138 of 260
- Power play20%52 of 260
- Rebound8.1%21 of 260
- Empty net10.4%27 of 260
- Off a turnover3.1%8 of 260
- Goalie pulled0.8%2 of 260
- Shorthanded3.1%8 of 260
- Off a faceoff win1.5%4 of 260
260 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals NY Rangers allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play45.5%5 of 11
- Power play18.2%2 of 11
- Rebound0%0 of 11
- Empty net18.2%2 of 11
- Off a turnover18.2%2 of 11
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 11
- Shorthanded0%0 of 11
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 11
11 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.