Ottawa Senators
3-1-0
All Senators playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Ottawa plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 4 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 4 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
54.7 shot attempts per 6021st of 32
51.3 shot attempts per 6025th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot7th of 32
a 6.8% chance of scoring on the average shot13th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.5% of chances come from rebounds7th of 32
13.8% of chances come from rebounds8th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.6% of chances come right after a turnover9th of 32
14.3% of chances come right after a turnover3rd of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
33.4% of shot attempts come from defensemen23rd of 32
29.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen29th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
30.6% of shots come from within 20 feet16th of 32
29.5% of shots come from within 20 feet22nd of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
53.7 shot attempts allowed per 608th of 32
58.3 shot attempts allowed per 6023rd of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot against10th of 32
a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against18th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.37 defensive breakdowns per 603rd of 32
0.34 defensive breakdowns per 6015th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.06 goals saved above expected per 6025th of 32
+1.11 goals saved above expected per 605th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
79.2 shots per 60, both teams combined26th of 32
77.8 shots per 60, both teams combined21st of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 118 (100 is league average)5th of 3227.9 forecheck plays recorded per 603rd of 32
forecheck score 116 (100 is league average)9th of 3229.9 forecheck plays recorded per 607th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 118 (100 is league average)3rd of 3232.2 hits recorded per 602nd of 32
hit score 115 (100 is league average)8th of 3235.6 hits recorded per 606th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
40.7% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six27th of 32
39.3% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six31st of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
7.6 expected goals per 60 on the power play11th of 32
7.2 expected goals per 60 on the power play14th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
7.0 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded7th of 32
9.0 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded7th of 32
1.6 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded6th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.17 more penalties drawn than taken per 604th of 32
0.25 more penalties drawn than taken per 6012th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Ottawa leans on, and what they do best.
20:54 a game
#18 · Center · 6 P in 4 GP (3 G, 3 A)
- Most ice time
- L3 · Foegele, Batherson
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- Shorthanded threatTop 10
- Drawing penaltiestop 5%
- Fast burststop 4%
- Power-play chancesbottom 2%
- Setting up goalstop 19%
- Drawing penaltiestop 23%
- Fast burststop 14%
19:28 a game
#12 · Center · 3 P in 4 GP (0 G, 3 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L1 · Giroux, Amadio
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Preventing chancestop 6%
- Creating his own chancestop 12%
- Shooting volumetop 15%
- Staying out of the boxbottom 12%
- Hardest shottop 10%
- Staying out of the boxbottom 20%
18:33 a game
#24 · Center · 0 P in 4 GP (0 G, 0 A)
- L2 · Zetterlund, Eklund
- PP1
- Shooting volumetop 12%
- Creating his own chancestop 14%
- Top speedtop 4%
- Shot blockingbottom 14%
- Hittingtop 18%
17:01 a game
#22 · Right wing · 3 P in 4 GP (2 G, 1 A)
- L1 · Giroux, Pinto
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Takeawaystop 4%
- Preventing chancestop 11%
- Staying out of the boxtop 12%
- Shooting volumebottom 19%
- Distance skatedtop 7%
- Hardest shottop 13%
26:42 a game
#72 · Defenseman · 2 P in 4 GP (1 G, 1 A)
- Most ice time
- P1 · Spence
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Shot blockingTop 10
- Shorthanded threattop 6%
- Distance skatedtop 5%
- Hittingbottom 24%
- Drawing penaltiestop 9%
- Shot blockingtop 13%
22:38 a game
#10 · Defenseman · 0 P in 4 GP (0 G, 0 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P1 · Chabot
- Kills penalties
- Creating chances1st
- Preventing chancestop 18%
- Creating his own chancestop 21%
- Drawing penaltiesbottom 1%
- Creating chancestop 16%
- Preventing chancesbottom 16%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Senators players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (4 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Worth knowing
- J. Spence has started killing penalties: on the ice for 41% of the team’s shorthanded time in 4 games, up from 4% last season.
- L17:07 a game
- Creates
- 2.92
- Allows
- 2.27
- Share
- 56.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 27%
- L27:41 a gamein 3 of last 4
F. ZetterlundD. CozensW. Eklund
- Creates
- 2.92
- Allows
- 2.08
- Share
- 58.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 40%
- L37:50 a gamein 2 of last 4
W. FoegeleD. BathersonT. Stützle
- Creates
- 2.30
- Allows
- 2.46
- Share
- 48.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 40%
- L43:54 a gamein 2 of last 4
N. CousinsH. HodgsonS. Halliday
- Creates
- 2.34
- Allows
- 2.75
- Share
- 46.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 60%
- P113:13 a game
- Creates
- 2.90
- Allows
- 2.61
- Share
- 52.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 43%
- P28:24 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.28
- Allows
- 2.64
- Share
- 46.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 53%
- P3New9:01 last game
- Creates
- 2.64
- Allows
- 2.62
- Share
- 50.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 43%
Last game
Against Philadelphia Flyers, these groups were different from the usual
- L2: F. Zetterlund · D. Cozens · R. Greig (3:57)
- L3: N. Cousins · D. Batherson · T. Stützle (2:52)
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Ottawa group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Cousins, Hodgson, Halliday (L4) have spent 64% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 25%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Giroux · Amadio · PintoOpp. L136%Opp. L230%Opp. L320%Opp. L415%
- L2Zetterlund · Cozens · EklundOpp. L130%Opp. L227%Opp. L319%Opp. L424%
- L3Foegele · Batherson · StützleOpp. L139%Opp. L222%Opp. L315%Opp. L424%
- L4Cousins · Hodgson · HallidayOpp. L111%Opp. L215%Opp. L364%Opp. L411%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Chabot · SpenceOpp. L132%Opp. L226%Opp. L323%Opp. L418%
- P2Kleven · YakemchukOpp. L129%Opp. L226%Opp. L325%Opp. L419%
- P3Matinpalo · StanleyOpp. L124%Opp. L217%Opp. L335%Opp. L423%
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Giroux · Amadio · PintoOpp. L15%Opp. L269%Opp. L320%Opp. L47%
- L2Zetterlund · Cozens · EklundOpp. L15%Opp. L244%Opp. L345%Opp. L47%
- L3Foegele · Batherson · StützleOpp. L123%Opp. L256%Opp. L311%Opp. L49%
- L4Cousins · Hodgson · HallidayOpp. L10%Opp. L236%Opp. L364%Opp. L40%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Chabot · SpenceOpp. L116%Opp. L254%Opp. L319%Opp. L411%
- P2Kleven · YakemchukOpp. L111%Opp. L270%Opp. L312%Opp. L47%
- P3Matinpalo · StanleyOpp. L16%Opp. L218%Opp. L374%Opp. L42%
Standing out on the road
- Giroux, Amadio, Pinto (L1) have spent 46% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 35%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Giroux · Amadio · PintoOpp. L146%Opp. L216%Opp. L320%Opp. L418%
- L2Zetterlund · Cozens · EklundOpp. L132%Opp. L226%Opp. L317%Opp. L425%
- L3Foegele · Batherson · StützleOpp. L141%Opp. L217%Opp. L316%Opp. L426%
- L4Cousins · Hodgson · HallidayOpp. L112%Opp. L211%Opp. L364%Opp. L412%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Chabot · SpenceOpp. L135%Opp. L221%Opp. L324%Opp. L420%
- P2Kleven · YakemchukOpp. L132%Opp. L220%Opp. L327%Opp. L421%
- P3Matinpalo · StanleyOpp. L129%Opp. L217%Opp. L325%Opp. L429%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Ottawa group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Ottawa, every Ottawa group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Ottawa sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (4 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP151% of the time
Creates 6.4 expected goals per 60
- T. ChabotQuarterback
- D. Cozensboth unitsTrigger
- C. GirouxDistributor
- S. HallidayNet-front
- F. Zetterlund
PP249% of the time
Creates 7.9 expected goals per 60
- C. YakemchukQuarterback
- D. Cozensboth units
- T. StützleDistributor
- D. BathersonTrigger
- W. Eklund
Penalty kill
Kills allow 7.0 expected goals per 60, 7th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 9.0 expected goals per 60, 26th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- T. Stützle13 of 14 kills · 0:59 a kill
- C. Giroux11 of 14 kills · 0:24 a kill · takes the draw
- N. MatinpaloD12 of 14 kills · 1:10 a kill
- T. KlevenD11 of 14 kills · 1:10 a kill
Second wave
- S. Pinto13 of 14 kills · 1:02 a kill
- M. Amadio11 of 14 kills · 0:58 a kill
- W. Foegele8 of 14 kills · 0:25 a kill
- T. ChabotD13 of 14 kills · 1:00 a kill
- J. SpenceD13 of 14 kills · 0:49 a kill
Spot duty
- R. Greig5 of 14 kills · 0:45 a kill
- N. Cousins3 of 14 kills · 0:22 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
L. Ullmark50 starts · 1266 shots faced, this season and last
−1.2 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .980 643 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .881 438 shots
- High-danger save %
- .627 185 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.32
- Quality starts
- 62%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for L. UllmarkHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−1.2 goals saved above expected in 50 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
25 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.9% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.32 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 83 seconds between shots; 24% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 62% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 16%
- Overall save %
- .894
L. Ullmark3 starts · 68 shots faced, this season
+4.8 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 31 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .935 31 shots
- High-danger save %
- .833 6 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for L. UllmarkHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+4.8 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
25.5 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots; 25% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .956
S. Ersson32 starts · 788 shots faced, this season and last
−11.8 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .972 387 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .818 275 shots
- High-danger save %
- .675 126 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 24.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.28
- Quality starts
- 38%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for S. ErssonHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−11.8 goals saved above expected in 32 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
24.3 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.0% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.28 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 85 seconds between shots; 26% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 38% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 31%
- Overall save %
- .871
S. Ersson1 start · 44 shots faced, this season
−0.4 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- .955 22 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .929 14 shots
- High-danger save %
- .625 8 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 33.9
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.77
- Quality starts
- 0%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for S. ErssonHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−0.4 goals saved above expected in 1 starttoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
33.9 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.8% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.77 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots; 11% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 0% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .886
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Ottawa’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
Every row of Ottawa’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play53.4%156 of 292
- Power play22.6%66 of 292
- Rebound7.2%21 of 292
- Empty net6.5%19 of 292
- Off a turnover4.1%12 of 292
- Goalie pulled2.4%7 of 292
- Shorthanded2.4%7 of 292
- Off a faceoff win1.4%4 of 292
292 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of Ottawa’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play58.3%7 of 12
- Power play25%3 of 12
- Rebound8.3%1 of 12
- Empty net0%0 of 12
- Off a turnover0%0 of 12
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 12
- Shorthanded8.3%1 of 12
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 12
12 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Ottawa allows come from the power play.
- Everyday even-strength play54.3%144 of 265
- Power play23.4%62 of 265
- Rebound6.8%18 of 265
- Empty net4.5%12 of 265
- Off a turnover6.8%18 of 265
- Goalie pulled1.5%4 of 265
- Shorthanded1.9%5 of 265
- Off a faceoff win0.8%2 of 265
265 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Ottawa allows come from turnovers.
- Everyday even-strength play33.3%3 of 9
- Power play33.3%3 of 9
- Rebound0%0 of 9
- Empty net11.1%1 of 9
- Off a turnover22.2%2 of 9
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 9
- Shorthanded0%0 of 9
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 9
9 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.