Philadelphia Flyers
0-4-2
All Flyers playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Philadelphia plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 6 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 6 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
44.7 shot attempts per 6032nd of 32
41.3 shot attempts per 6032nd of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot19th of 32
a 5.6% chance of scoring on the average shot27th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.1% of chances come from rebounds22nd of 32
13.4% of chances come from rebounds10th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.7% of chances come right after a turnover4th of 32
3.4% of chances come right after a turnover29th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
32.1% of shot attempts come from defensemen26th of 32
31.6% of shot attempts come from defensemen24th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
30.4% of shots come from within 20 feet19th of 32
25.2% of shots come from within 20 feet28th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
62.4 shot attempts allowed per 6031st of 32
73.3 shot attempts allowed per 6032nd of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against15th of 32
a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot against26th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.40 defensive breakdowns per 6013th of 32
0.68 defensive breakdowns per 6025th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.12 goals saved above expected per 6012th of 32
+0.48 goals saved above expected per 6012th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
77.5 shots per 60, both teams combined30th of 32
81.3 shots per 60, both teams combined12th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 86 (100 is league average)27th of 3219.4 forecheck plays recorded per 6027th of 32
forecheck score 71 (100 is league average)31st of 3217.1 forecheck plays recorded per 6031st of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 109 (100 is league average)9th of 3228.4 hits recorded per 609th of 32
hit score 104 (100 is league average)15th of 3229.5 hits recorded per 6015th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
43.3% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six9th of 32
43.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six10th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
7.5 expected goals per 60 on the power play13th of 32
6.2 expected goals per 60 on the power play22nd of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded13th of 32
6.8 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded15th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
0.8 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded20th of 32
0.6 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded20th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.19 more penalties taken than drawn per 6028th of 32
0.83 more penalties taken than drawn per 6028th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Philadelphia leans on, and what they do best.

- Most ice time
- L2 · Dvorak, Foerster
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Preventing chancesbottom 5%

- 2nd in ice time
- L2 · Dvorak, Zegras
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Takeawaysbottom 24%

- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
No clear strengths or weak spots yet.

- L2 · Zegras, Foerster
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Finishingbottom 2%
- Distance skatedbottom 10%

- Most ice time
- P1 · Drysdale
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Creating chancestop 25%
- Power-play chancesbottom 13%

- 2nd in ice time
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Preventing chancesbottom 8%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Flyers players.
OutCam York day to day·Rasmus Ristolainen injured reserve·Travis Konecny day to day·Carl Grundstrom scratched·Nikita Grebenkin out at least four months
Show the full roster · 26 playersHide the full roster
Forwards
- 46Trevor ZegrasC6 GP · 0 G · 2 A · 17:24
- 71Tyson FoersterRW6 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 16:52
- 11Travis KonecnyRWDay to day
- 22Christian DvorakC6 GP · 0 G · 1 A · 15:35
- 14Sean CouturierC6 GP · 0 G · 2 A · 15:23
- 74Owen TippettRW6 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 15:06
- 39Matvei MichkovRW6 GP · 2 G · 0 A · 14:33
- 52Noel AcciariC6 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 13:52
- 94Porter MartoneRW6 GP · 1 G · 0 A · 12:26
- 20Alex BumpLWOff the NHL roster
- 27Noah CatesLW6 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 11:27
- 86Denver BarkeyC3 GP · 0 G · 1 A · 11:09
- 91Carl GrundstromRWScratched
- 58Michael BuntingLW2 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 10:48
- 10Garrett WilsonLW1 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 8:20
- 17Nikita GrebenkinRWOut at least four months
Defense
- 6Travis SanheimD6 GP · 1 G · 1 A · 23:14
- 8Cam YorkDDay to day
- 9Jamie DrysdaleD6 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 20:12
- 55Rasmus RistolainenDInjured reserve
- 24Nick SeelerD6 GP · 0 G · 1 A · 16:52
- 5David JiricekD4 GP · 0 G · 1 A · 15:05
- 44Simon BenoitD5 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 13:43
- 3Helge GransD1 GP · 0 G · 0 A · 8:35
Goalies
- 80Dan VladarG3 GP · .856
- 53Joseph WollG3 GP · .927
Regulars here last season whom no NHL club lists now: Rodrigo Abols.
As of Oct. 10. Injury details come from the NHL.com Status Report when it names a player; otherwise we only say what the rosters show.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (6 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Worth knowing
- The forward lines keep changing. Even their four most-used trios over the last 6 games cover only 22% of their forwards’ 5-on-5 time, the lowest share in the league (a typical team: 51%). The lines listed lean on their latest games, but expect new combinations tonight.
- R. Ristolainen is on injured reserve (upper body injury) and has missed the last 3 games. He is a top-four defenseman. J. Drysdale has taken his spot beside T. Sanheim.
- C. York is day to day (upper body injury) and missed their last game. He is a top-pair defenseman. T. Sanheim has taken his spot beside J. Drysdale.
- T. Konecny is day to day (lower body injury) and missed their last game. He is a top-six forward.
- L1New7:42 last game
S. CouturierO. TippettM. Michkov
- Creates
- 3.17
- Allows
- 2.36
- Share
- 57.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 67%
- L2New6:40 last game
- Creates
- 2.97
- Allows
- 2.35
- Share
- 55.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 14%
- L3New5:51 last game
- Creates
- 2.37
- Allows
- 2.30
- Share
- 50.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- L4New5:06 last game
- Creates
- 2.43
- Allows
- 2.60
- Share
- 48.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- P112:16 a gamein 2 of last 6
- Creates
- 2.71
- Allows
- 2.23
- Share
- 54.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 43%
- P27:55 a gamein 3 of last 6
- Creates
- 2.48
- Allows
- 2.64
- Share
- 48.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 36%
- P3New5:30 last game
- Creates
- 2.67
- Allows
- 2.72
- Share
- 49.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
Last game
At Boston Bruins, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Philadelphia group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Cates, Barkey, Martone (L4) have spent 44% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 27%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Couturier · Tippett · MichkovOpp. L136%Opp. L225%Opp. L334%Opp. L45%
- L2Dvorak · Zegras · FoersterOpp. L136%Opp. L231%Opp. L321%Opp. L413%
- L3Wilson · Bunting · AcciariOpp. L131%Opp. L215%Opp. L36%Opp. L448%
- L4Cates · Barkey · MartoneOpp. L122%Opp. L212%Opp. L344%Opp. L422%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Sanheim · DrysdaleOpp. L133%Opp. L230%Opp. L323%Opp. L413%
- P2Seeler · JiricekOpp. L125%Opp. L223%Opp. L333%Opp. L419%
- P3Benoit · GransOpp. L112%Opp. L214%Opp. L338%Opp. L437%
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Couturier · Tippett · MichkovOpp. L131%Opp. L223%Opp. L343%Opp. L43%
- L2Dvorak · Zegras · FoersterOpp. L131%Opp. L237%Opp. L315%Opp. L417%
- L3Wilson · Bunting · AcciariOpp. L1–Opp. L2–Opp. L3–Opp. L4–
- L4Cates · Barkey · MartoneOpp. L141%Opp. L20%Opp. L316%Opp. L443%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Sanheim · DrysdaleOpp. L127%Opp. L229%Opp. L324%Opp. L420%
- P2Seeler · JiricekOpp. L130%Opp. L219%Opp. L324%Opp. L427%
- P3Benoit · GransOpp. L120%Opp. L20%Opp. L340%Opp. L440%
Standing out on the road
- Cates, Barkey, Martone (L4) have spent 56% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 30%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Couturier · Tippett · MichkovOpp. L137%Opp. L226%Opp. L332%Opp. L45%
- L2Dvorak · Zegras · FoersterOpp. L138%Opp. L227%Opp. L325%Opp. L410%
- L3Wilson · Bunting · AcciariOpp. L131%Opp. L215%Opp. L36%Opp. L448%
- L4Cates · Barkey · MartoneOpp. L114%Opp. L218%Opp. L356%Opp. L412%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Sanheim · DrysdaleOpp. L137%Opp. L231%Opp. L323%Opp. L49%
- P2Seeler · JiricekOpp. L122%Opp. L226%Opp. L338%Opp. L414%
- P3Benoit · GransOpp. L112%Opp. L214%Opp. L338%Opp. L437%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Philadelphia group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Philadelphia, every Philadelphia group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Philadelphia sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (6 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP173% of the time
Creates 6.3 expected goals per 60
- J. DrysdaleQuarterback
- T. Zegrasboth unitsTrigger
- M. Michkovboth unitsNet-front
- T. Foersterboth units
- T. Konecnyboth unitsDistributor
PP226% of the time
Creates 7.5 expected goals per 60
- D. JiricekQuarterback
- T. Zegrasboth unitsTrigger
- M. Michkovboth unitsNet-front
- T. Foersterboth units
- T. Konecnyboth unitsDistributor
Penalty kill
Kills allow 7.4 expected goals per 60, 13th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 6.8 expected goals per 60, 15th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- S. Couturier20 of 21 kills · 0:57 a kill
- N. Acciari19 of 21 kills · 0:52 a kill · takes the draw
- T. SanheimD19 of 21 kills · 1:13 a kill
- C. YorkD20 of 21 kills · 1:01 a kill
Second wave
- T. Foerster19 of 21 kills · 0:46 a kill
- N. Cates15 of 21 kills · 0:53 a kill
- C. Dvorak16 of 21 kills · 0:35 a kill
- N. SeelerD18 of 21 kills · 0:55 a kill
- S. BenoitD9 of 21 kills · 0:46 a kill
- R. RistolainenD9 of 21 kills · 0:43 a kill
Spot duty
- T. Konecny4 of 21 kills · 0:30 a kill
- J. DrysdaleD6 of 21 kills · 0:36 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
J. Woll41 starts · 1331 shots faced, this season and last
+3.6 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .979 699 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .859 462 shots
- High-danger save %
- .694 170 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 33.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.27
- Quality starts
- 66%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. WollHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+3.6 goals saved above expected in 41 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
33.1 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.27 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 65 seconds between shots; 16% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 66% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 27%
- Overall save %
- .901
J. Woll3 starts · 110 shots faced, this season
+3.5 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .965 57 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .925 40 shots
- High-danger save %
- .769 13 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 35.9
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.33
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. WollHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+3.5 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
35.9 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.2% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.33 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 56 seconds between shots; 13% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .927
D. Vladar52 starts · 1387 shots faced, this season and last
+10.4 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .984 709 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .863 489 shots
- High-danger save %
- .693 189 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 26.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.42
- Quality starts
- 73%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for D. VladarHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+10.4 goals saved above expected in 52 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
26.3 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.42 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 78 seconds between shots; 23% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 73% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 19%
- Overall save %
- .902
D. Vladar3 starts · 104 shots faced, this season
−2.5 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .955 44 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .826 46 shots
- High-danger save %
- .643 14 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 35.9
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.69
- Quality starts
- 33%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for D. VladarHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−2.5 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
35.9 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 8.6% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.69 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 60 seconds between shots; 17% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 33% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 67%
- Overall save %
- .856
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Philadelphia’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: more of Philadelphia’s goals come from empty nets; fewer from the power play and rebounds.
- Everyday even-strength play59%157 of 266
- Power play15%40 of 266
- Rebound3.8%10 of 266
- Empty net8.6%23 of 266
- Off a turnover6.4%17 of 266
- Goalie pulled3.4%9 of 266
- Shorthanded2.6%7 of 266
- Off a faceoff win1.1%3 of 266
266 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of Philadelphia’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play66.7%4 of 6
- Power play16.7%1 of 6
- Rebound0%0 of 6
- Empty net0%0 of 6
- Off a turnover0%0 of 6
- Goalie pulled16.7%1 of 6
- Shorthanded0%0 of 6
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 6
6 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Philadelphia allows come from the power play and faceoff wins; fewer from rebounds.
- Everyday even-strength play55.3%157 of 284
- Power play23.2%66 of 284
- Rebound4.2%12 of 284
- Empty net5.3%15 of 284
- Off a turnover4.2%12 of 284
- Goalie pulled1.8%5 of 284
- Shorthanded3.2%9 of 284
- Off a faceoff win2.8%8 of 284
284 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals Philadelphia allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play57.1%12 of 21
- Power play23.8%5 of 21
- Rebound0%0 of 21
- Empty net4.8%1 of 21
- Off a turnover4.8%1 of 21
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 21
- Shorthanded4.8%1 of 21
- Off a faceoff win4.8%1 of 21
21 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.