Seattle Kraken
3-2-0
All Kraken playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Seattle plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 5 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 5 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
52.3 shot attempts per 6025th of 32
53.1 shot attempts per 6023rd of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot16th of 32
a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot12th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.3% of chances come from rebounds11th of 32
9.7% of chances come from rebounds16th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.4% of chances come right after a turnover16th of 32
7.7% of chances come right after a turnover17th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
34.1% of shot attempts come from defensemen19th of 32
31.6% of shot attempts come from defensemen23rd of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
29.7% of shots come from within 20 feet23rd of 32
33.5% of shots come from within 20 feet12th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
64.7 shot attempts allowed per 6032nd of 32
69.5 shot attempts allowed per 6031st of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against6th of 32
a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against17th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.44 defensive breakdowns per 6028th of 32
0.73 defensive breakdowns per 6026th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.12 goals saved above expected per 6011th of 32
+0.64 goals saved above expected per 609th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
83.5 shots per 60, both teams combined9th of 32
87.7 shots per 60, both teams combined5th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 81 (100 is league average)30th of 3218.2 forecheck plays recorded per 6031st of 32
forecheck score 74 (100 is league average)30th of 3218.2 forecheck plays recorded per 6030th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 90 (100 is league average)24th of 3223.5 hits recorded per 6026th of 32
hit score 87 (100 is league average)23rd of 3225.1 hits recorded per 6024th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
43.4% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six8th of 32
44.2% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six7th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
7.2 expected goals per 60 on the power play23rd of 32
7.1 expected goals per 60 on the power play16th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
8.3 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded28th of 32
7.3 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded18th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
0.5 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded32nd of 32
0.3 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded23rd of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.07 more penalties drawn than taken per 6010th of 32
0.40 more penalties drawn than taken per 609th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Seattle leans on, and what they do best.
17:03 a game
#9 · Center · 5 P in 5 GP (1 G, 4 A)
- Most ice time
- L1 · Eberle, McMann
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- TakeawaysTop 10
- Finishingtop 6%
- Faceoffstop 16%
- Shooting volumebottom 1%
- Takeawaystop 3%
- Faceoffstop 24%
- Top speedtop 10%
- Hittingbottom 9%
16:37 a game
#10 · Center · 3 P in 5 GP (1 G, 2 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L2 · McCann, Samoskevich
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Staying out of the boxtop 6%
- Shot blockingtop 20%
- Distance skatedtop 11%
- Creating chancesbottom 12%
- Takeawaystop 11%
- Distance skatedTop 5
16:28 a game
#74 · Center · 2 P in 5 GP (2 G, 0 A)
- L1 · Eberle, Stephenson
- PP2
- Tough minutes
- Shooting volumeTop 10
- Finishingtop 12%
- Top speedTop 10
- Drawing penaltiesbottom 9%
- Shot blockingtop 18%
- Fast burststop 4%
- Top speedtop 7%
16:06 a game
#7 · Right wing · 4 P in 5 GP (2 G, 2 A)
- L1 · Stephenson, McMann
- PP2
- Preventing chancestop 12%
- Power-play chancestop 17%
- Shot blockingtop 22%
- Drawing penaltiesbottom 19%
- Shot blockingtop 17%
- Hardest shotbottom 3%
23:22 a game
#62 · Defenseman · 4 P in 5 GP (0 G, 4 A)
- Most ice time
- P1 · Evans
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Takeawaystop 6%
- Hardest shotTop 10
- Distance skatedTop 10
- Preventing chancesbottom 20%
- Fast burstsTop 10
- Distance skatedtop 7%
- Top speedtop 12%
21:55 a game
#41 · Defenseman · 2 P in 5 GP (0 G, 2 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P1 · Montour
- Kills penalties
- FinishingTop 5
- Drawing penaltiestop 14%
- Top speedtop 12%
- Creating his own chancesbottom 3%
- Drawing penaltiestop 19%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Kraken players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (5 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
- L111:03 a game
J. EberleC. StephensonB. McMann
- Creates
- 3.17
- Allows
- 2.31
- Share
- 57.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 36%
- L210:06 a gamein 3 of last 5
J. McCannM. BeniersM. Samoskevich
- Creates
- 2.99
- Allows
- 2.19
- Share
- 57.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 48%
- L39:34 a gamein 3 of last 5
- Creates
- 2.94
- Allows
- 2.49
- Share
- 54.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 71%
- L48:42 a gamein 2 of last 5
F. GaudreauR. WintertonB. Meyers
- Creates
- 2.54
- Allows
- 2.78
- Share
- 47.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 17%
- P116:01 a game
- Creates
- 2.78
- Allows
- 2.28
- Share
- 54.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 59%
- P215:04 a game
- Creates
- 2.40
- Allows
- 2.67
- Share
- 47.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 41%
- P3New10:39 last game
- Creates
- 2.90
- Allows
- 2.85
- Share
- 50.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 20%
Last game
At Detroit Red Wings, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Seattle group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Kakko, Wright, Catton (L3) have spent 25% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 13%.
- Eberle, Stephenson, McMann (L1) have spent 44% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 33%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Eberle · Stephenson · McMannOpp. L144%Opp. L219%Opp. L332%Opp. L45%
- L2McCann · Beniers · SamoskevichOpp. L129%Opp. L234%Opp. L330%Opp. L46%
- L3Kakko · Wright · CattonOpp. L125%Opp. L231%Opp. L320%Opp. L425%
- L4Gaudreau · Winterton · MeyersOpp. L130%Opp. L218%Opp. L333%Opp. L419%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Montour · EvansOpp. L132%Opp. L230%Opp. L327%Opp. L411%
- P2Larsson · DunnOpp. L142%Opp. L220%Opp. L326%Opp. L412%
- P3Mahura · OttavainenOpp. L131%Opp. L222%Opp. L332%Opp. L416%
Standing out at home
- Eberle, Stephenson, McMann (L1) have spent 47% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 31%.
- McCann, Beniers, Samoskevich (L2) have spent 42% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 28%.
- Kakko, Wright, Catton (L3) have spent 43% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 31%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Eberle · Stephenson · McMannOpp. L147%Opp. L227%Opp. L323%Opp. L43%
- L2McCann · Beniers · SamoskevichOpp. L127%Opp. L221%Opp. L342%Opp. L410%
- L3Kakko · Wright · CattonOpp. L128%Opp. L243%Opp. L315%Opp. L414%
- L4Gaudreau · Winterton · MeyersOpp. L117%Opp. L234%Opp. L334%Opp. L416%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Montour · EvansOpp. L125%Opp. L238%Opp. L322%Opp. L415%
- P2Larsson · DunnOpp. L143%Opp. L219%Opp. L331%Opp. L47%
- P3Mahura · OttavainenOpp. L131%Opp. L231%Opp. L338%Opp. L40%
Standing out on the road
- McCann, Beniers, Samoskevich (L2) have spent 45% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 22%.
- Kakko, Wright, Catton (L3) have spent 33% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 15%.
- Mahura, Ottavainen (P3) have spent 26% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 14%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Eberle · Stephenson · McMannOpp. L142%Opp. L214%Opp. L337%Opp. L47%
- L2McCann · Beniers · SamoskevichOpp. L131%Opp. L245%Opp. L321%Opp. L43%
- L3Kakko · Wright · CattonOpp. L122%Opp. L221%Opp. L324%Opp. L433%
- L4Gaudreau · Winterton · MeyersOpp. L139%Opp. L27%Opp. L333%Opp. L421%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Montour · EvansOpp. L138%Opp. L223%Opp. L331%Opp. L48%
- P2Larsson · DunnOpp. L141%Opp. L221%Opp. L323%Opp. L416%
- P3Mahura · OttavainenOpp. L131%Opp. L215%Opp. L328%Opp. L426%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Seattle group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Seattle, every Seattle group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Seattle sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (5 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP160% of the time
Creates 6.3 expected goals per 60
- B. MontourQuarterback
- B. Catton
- K. KakkoNet-front
- M. BeniersTrigger
- S. Wright
PP240% of the time
Creates 8.1 expected goals per 60
- V. DunnQuarterback
- J. McCannDistributor
- J. EberleTrigger
- B. McMann
- C. Stephenson
Penalty kill
Kills allow 8.3 expected goals per 60, 28th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 7.3 expected goals per 60, 18th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- F. Gaudreau10 of 10 kills · 1:13 a kill · takes the draw
- B. Meyers6 of 10 kills · 0:54 a kill
- A. LarssonD10 of 10 kills · 1:28 a kill
- R. LindgrenD6 of 10 kills · 1:21 a kill
- V. DunnD5 of 10 kills · 0:48 a kill
Second wave
- R. Winterton8 of 10 kills · 0:59 a kill
- C. Stephenson7 of 10 kills · 0:35 a kill
- M. Beniers6 of 10 kills · 0:30 a kill
- J. McCann6 of 10 kills · 0:26 a kill
- R. EvansD7 of 10 kills · 0:53 a kill
- B. MontourD8 of 10 kills · 0:43 a kill
Spot duty
- B. McMann2 of 10 kills · 0:36 a kill
- J. Eberle3 of 10 kills · 0:22 a kill
- J. Melanson1 of 10 kills · 0:29 a kill
- C. FleuryD3 of 10 kills · 1:22 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
J. Daccord47 starts · 1388 shots faced, this season and last
+0.5 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .970 764 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .861 446 shots
- High-danger save %
- .674 178 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.44
- Quality starts
- 55%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. DaccordHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+0.5 goals saved above expected in 47 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
29.2 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.6% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.44 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 69 seconds between shots; 21% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 55% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 23%
- Overall save %
- .897
J. Daccord3 starts · 79 shots faced, this season
+0.2 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .979 47 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .913 23 shots
- High-danger save %
- .556 9 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29.7
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.13
- Quality starts
- 67%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. DaccordHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+0.2 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
29.7 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 5.5% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
1.13 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 93 seconds between shots; 15% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 67% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 33%
- Overall save %
- .911
P. Grubauer33 starts · 938 shots faced, this season and last
+13.4 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .973 486 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .915 330 shots
- High-danger save %
- .639 122 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.44
- Quality starts
- 61%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for P. GrubauerHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+13.4 goals saved above expected in 33 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
29.2 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.44 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots; 21% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 61% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 18%
- Overall save %
- .909
P. Grubauer2 starts · 72 shots faced, this season
+3.0 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .938 32 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .960 25 shots
- High-danger save %
- .800 15 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 31.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for P. GrubauerHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+3.0 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
31.1 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 8.2% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 47 seconds between shots; 18% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .917
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Seattle’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: fewer of Seattle’s goals come from shorthanded play and faceoff wins.
- Everyday even-strength play57.1%140 of 245
- Power play18.8%46 of 245
- Rebound9%22 of 245
- Empty net6.9%17 of 245
- Off a turnover5.7%14 of 245
- Goalie pulled2%5 of 245
- Shorthanded0.4%1 of 245
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 245
245 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of Seattle’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play71.4%15 of 21
- Power play19%4 of 21
- Rebound4.8%1 of 21
- Empty net0%0 of 21
- Off a turnover4.8%1 of 21
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 21
- Shorthanded0%0 of 21
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 21
21 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Seattle allows come from empty nets and turnovers; fewer from rebounds and play with the goalie pulled.
- Everyday even-strength play51.7%140 of 271
- Power play22.9%62 of 271
- Rebound4.4%12 of 271
- Empty net8.9%24 of 271
- Off a turnover7%19 of 271
- Goalie pulled0.7%2 of 271
- Shorthanded3%8 of 271
- Off a faceoff win1.5%4 of 271
271 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals Seattle allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play50%7 of 14
- Power play28.6%4 of 14
- Rebound0%0 of 14
- Empty net7.1%1 of 14
- Off a turnover7.1%1 of 14
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 14
- Shorthanded7.1%1 of 14
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 14
14 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.