San Jose Sharks
3-1-0
All Sharks playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How San Jose plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 4 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 4 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
47.4 shot attempts per 6029th of 32
43.5 shot attempts per 6029th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot22nd of 32
a 5.1% chance of scoring on the average shot31st of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.3% of chances come from rebounds12th of 32
2.4% of chances come from rebounds31st of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.0% of chances come right after a turnover24th of 32
11.0% of chances come right after a turnover10th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
35.3% of shot attempts come from defensemen15th of 32
38.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen1st of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
30.5% of shots come from within 20 feet17th of 32
24.8% of shots come from within 20 feet30th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
59.9 shot attempts allowed per 6025th of 32
63.2 shot attempts allowed per 6027th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot against29th of 32
a 7.9% chance of scoring on the average shot against31st of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.44 defensive breakdowns per 6025th of 32
0.93 defensive breakdowns per 6029th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.02 goals saved above expected per 6031st of 32
+0.52 goals saved above expected per 6011th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
78.3 shots per 60, both teams combined29th of 32
74.2 shots per 60, both teams combined25th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 102 (100 is league average)14th of 3222.5 forecheck plays recorded per 6016th of 32
forecheck score 102 (100 is league average)14th of 3224.4 forecheck plays recorded per 6015th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 116 (100 is league average)4th of 3229.1 hits recorded per 608th of 32
hit score 118 (100 is league average)7th of 3233.1 hits recorded per 609th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
42.2% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six15th of 32
43.9% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six8th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
7.0 expected goals per 60 on the power play26th of 32
7.1 expected goals per 60 on the power play17th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
8.0 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded24th of 32
9.9 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded30th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
0.8 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded19th of 32
1.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded12th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.02 more penalties drawn than taken per 6016th of 32
0.24 more penalties taken than drawn per 6018th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who San Jose leans on, and what they do best.
22:20 a game
#71 · Center · 5 P in 2 GP (0 G, 5 A)
- Most ice time
- PP1
- Setting up goalsTop 10
- Finishingtop 5%
- Takeawaystop 5%
- Hittingbottom 5%
No clear strengths or weak spots yet.
19:32 a game
#21 · Center · 1 P in 4 GP (0 G, 1 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L2 · Sherwood, Stenberg
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Staying out of the boxtop 6%
- Preventing chancestop 14%
- Shot blockingtop 16%
- Shooting volumebottom 1%
- Fast burststop 12%
- Hittingbottom 19%
18:13 a game
#2 · Center · 3 P in 4 GP (2 G, 1 A)
- L1 · Marchment, Chernyshov
- PP1
- Staying out of the boxtop 8%
- Setting up goalstop 9%
- Shooting volumetop 22%
- Shot blockingbottom 1%
- Preventing chancesbottom 15%
15:52 a game
#27 · Left wing · 1 P in 4 GP (1 G, 0 A)
- L1 · Smith, Chernyshov
- PP2
- TakeawaysTop 10
- Hittingtop 20%
- Staying out of the boxbottom 14%
- Takeawaystop 7%
- Hittingtop 20%
- Preventing chancesbottom 18%
21:29 a game
#65 · Defenseman · 2 P in 4 GP (0 G, 2 A)
- Most ice time
- P3 · Dickinson
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- Shorthanded threatTop 10
- Hittingtop 14%
- Shooting volumetop 21%
- Preventing chancesbottom 11%
- Hittingtop 18%
- Top speedbottom 7%
20:58 a game
#25 · Defenseman · 1 P in 4 GP (1 G, 0 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P1 · Kesselring
- Kills penalties
- Shot blockingtop 5%
- Shooting volumetop 19%
- Top speedtop 7%
- Preventing chancesbottom 15%
- Top speedTop 5
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Sharks players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (4 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
- L1New11:27 last game
M. MarchmentW. SmithI. Chernyshov
- Creates
- 3.18
- Allows
- 2.55
- Share
- 55.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 67%
- L2New10:16 last game
A. WennbergK. SherwoodI. Stenberg
- Creates
- 2.98
- Allows
- 2.38
- Share
- 55.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 12%
- L3New8:58 last game
- Creates
- 2.54
- Allows
- 2.44
- Share
- 51.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 75%
- L4New8:13 last game
B. GoodrowT. DellandreaZ. Ostapchuk
- Creates
- 2.36
- Allows
- 2.82
- Share
- 45.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- P114:35 a game
- Creates
- 2.20
- Allows
- 2.48
- Share
- 47.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- P212:58 a game
- Creates
- 2.31
- Allows
- 2.91
- Share
- 44.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- P312:34 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.67
- Allows
- 3.16
- Share
- 45.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 57%
Last game
At St. Louis Blues, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each San Jose group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Goodrow, Dellandrea, Ostapchuk (L4) have spent 26% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 12%.
- Trouba, Dickinson (P3) have spent 46% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 32%.
- Orlov, Cagnoni (P2) have spent 41% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 29%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Marchment · Smith · ChernyshovOpp. L138%Opp. L225%Opp. L326%Opp. L410%
- L2Wennberg · Sherwood · StenbergOpp. L141%Opp. L230%Opp. L323%Opp. L46%
- L3Toffoli · Graf · MisaOpp. L120%Opp. L238%Opp. L333%Opp. L49%
- L4Goodrow · Dellandrea · OstapchukOpp. L129%Opp. L220%Opp. L325%Opp. L426%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Nurse · KesselringOpp. L131%Opp. L222%Opp. L334%Opp. L413%
- P2Orlov · CagnoniOpp. L122%Opp. L241%Opp. L322%Opp. L414%
- P3Trouba · DickinsonOpp. L146%Opp. L225%Opp. L319%Opp. L410%
Standing out at home
- Trouba, Dickinson (P3) have spent 63% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 37%.
- Orlov, Cagnoni (P2) have spent 51% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 30%.
- Wennberg, Sherwood, Stenberg (L2) have spent 57% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 37%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Marchment · Smith · ChernyshovOpp. L132%Opp. L232%Opp. L335%Opp. L42%
- L2Wennberg · Sherwood · StenbergOpp. L157%Opp. L220%Opp. L322%Opp. L40%
- L3Toffoli · Graf · MisaOpp. L117%Opp. L250%Opp. L327%Opp. L46%
- L4Goodrow · Dellandrea · OstapchukOpp. L139%Opp. L220%Opp. L315%Opp. L426%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Nurse · KesselringOpp. L132%Opp. L229%Opp. L333%Opp. L46%
- P2Orlov · CagnoniOpp. L121%Opp. L251%Opp. L321%Opp. L47%
- P3Trouba · DickinsonOpp. L163%Opp. L26%Opp. L328%Opp. L43%
Standing out on the road
- Trouba, Dickinson (P3) have spent 43% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 28%.
- Marchment, Smith, Chernyshov (L1) have spent 44% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 30%.
- Wennberg, Sherwood, Stenberg (L2) have spent 40% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 26%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Marchment · Smith · ChernyshovOpp. L144%Opp. L219%Opp. L319%Opp. L418%
- L2Wennberg · Sherwood · StenbergOpp. L123%Opp. L240%Opp. L325%Opp. L411%
- L3Toffoli · Graf · MisaOpp. L124%Opp. L227%Opp. L338%Opp. L412%
- L4Goodrow · Dellandrea · OstapchukOpp. L123%Opp. L221%Opp. L331%Opp. L425%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Nurse · KesselringOpp. L130%Opp. L216%Opp. L336%Opp. L418%
- P2Orlov · CagnoniOpp. L124%Opp. L231%Opp. L323%Opp. L422%
- P3Trouba · DickinsonOpp. L130%Opp. L243%Opp. L311%Opp. L416%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one San Jose group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against San Jose, every San Jose group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who San Jose sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (4 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP167% of the time
Creates 7.6 expected goals per 60
- L. CagnoniQuarterback
- A. WennbergDistributor
- W. Smith
- I. ChernyshovNet-front
- M. CelebriniTrigger
PP233% of the time
Creates 6.5 expected goals per 60
- J. TroubaQuarterback
- T. ToffoliTrigger
- M. Marchment
- M. MisaNet-front
- K. Sherwood
Penalty kill
Kills allow 8.0 expected goals per 60, 24th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 9.9 expected goals per 60, 30th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- B. Goodrow13 of 13 kills · 1:00 a kill
- C. Graf10 of 13 kills · 0:48 a kill · takes the draw
- J. TroubaD13 of 13 kills · 1:01 a kill
- D. NurseD10 of 13 kills · 0:59 a kill
- N. AllanD7 of 13 kills · 1:05 a kill
Second wave
- Z. Ostapchuk10 of 13 kills · 0:49 a kill
- K. Sherwood9 of 13 kills · 0:42 a kill
- A. Wennberg7 of 13 kills · 0:52 a kill
- M. KesselringD10 of 13 kills · 0:57 a kill
Spot duty
- T. Dellandrea4 of 13 kills · 0:36 a kill · takes the draw
- M. Celebrini4 of 13 kills · 0:32 a kill
- D. OrlovD5 of 13 kills · 0:46 a kill
- S. DickinsonD4 of 13 kills · 0:57 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
Y. Askarov45 starts · 1429 shots faced, this season and last
−16.3 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .963 722 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .855 511 shots
- High-danger save %
- .653 196 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 30.8
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.34
- Quality starts
- 42%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for Y. AskarovHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−16.3 goals saved above expected in 45 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
30.8 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.1% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 65 seconds between shots; 19% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 42% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 31%
- Overall save %
- .882
Y. Askarov3 starts · 87 shots faced, this season
+0.2 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .955 44 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .828 29 shots
- High-danger save %
- .643 14 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.64
- Quality starts
- 0%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for Y. AskarovHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+0.2 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
28 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 8.1% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.64 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 82 seconds between shots; 23% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 0% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 33%
- Overall save %
- .862
A. Nedeljkovic40 starts · 1075 shots faced, this season and last
+2.6 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .969 550 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .848 356 shots
- High-danger save %
- .763 169 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 27.6
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.51
- Quality starts
- 58%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for A. NedeljkovicHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+2.6 goals saved above expected in 40 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
27.6 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.1% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.51 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 75 seconds between shots; 22% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 58% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 28%
- Overall save %
- .897
A. Nedeljkovic1 start · 26 shots faced, this season
+1.9 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 8 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .857 14 shots
- High-danger save %
- 1.000 4 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.6
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.98
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for A. NedeljkovicHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+1.9 goals saved above expected in 1 starttoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
25.6 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 9.9% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.98 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 116 seconds between shots; 15% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .923
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How San Jose’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
Every row of San Jose’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play54.4%142 of 261
- Power play21.5%56 of 261
- Rebound8.8%23 of 261
- Empty net4.6%12 of 261
- Off a turnover5.4%14 of 261
- Goalie pulled2.3%6 of 261
- Shorthanded1.5%4 of 261
- Off a faceoff win1.5%4 of 261
261 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of San Jose’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play58.3%7 of 12
- Power play16.7%2 of 12
- Rebound0%0 of 12
- Empty net0%0 of 12
- Off a turnover16.7%2 of 12
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 12
- Shorthanded8.3%1 of 12
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 12
12 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals San Jose allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play53.9%164 of 304
- Power play20.1%61 of 304
- Rebound6.9%21 of 304
- Empty net5.9%18 of 304
- Off a turnover5.9%18 of 304
- Goalie pulled3%9 of 304
- Shorthanded2.6%8 of 304
- Off a faceoff win1.6%5 of 304
304 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals San Jose allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play57.1%8 of 14
- Power play21.4%3 of 14
- Rebound0%0 of 14
- Empty net0%0 of 14
- Off a turnover14.3%2 of 14
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 14
- Shorthanded7.1%1 of 14
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 14
14 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.