St. Louis Blues
1-2-1
All Blues playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How St. Louis plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 4 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 4 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
55.2 shot attempts per 6019th of 32
58.1 shot attempts per 6011th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot1st of 32
a 7.6% chance of scoring on the average shot2nd of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.0% of chances come from rebounds26th of 32
21.0% of chances come from rebounds4th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.3% of chances come right after a turnover19th of 32
4.8% of chances come right after a turnover23rd of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
36.6% of shot attempts come from defensemen5th of 32
37.9% of shot attempts come from defensemen4th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
29.5% of shots come from within 20 feet24th of 32
30.8% of shots come from within 20 feet20th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
54.9 shot attempts allowed per 6011th of 32
52.4 shot attempts allowed per 6011th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against7th of 32
a 5.7% chance of scoring on the average shot against4th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.40 defensive breakdowns per 6015th of 32
0.96 defensive breakdowns per 6030th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.10 goals saved above expected per 6017th of 32
−0.07 goals saved above expected per 6020th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
78.4 shots per 60, both teams combined28th of 32
77.5 shots per 60, both teams combined22nd of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 105 (100 is league average)12th of 3223.8 forecheck plays recorded per 6010th of 32
forecheck score 104 (100 is league average)12th of 3225.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6012th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 104 (100 is league average)13th of 3227.7 hits recorded per 6014th of 32
hit score 104 (100 is league average)14th of 3230.0 hits recorded per 6014th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
42.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six11th of 32
42.4% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six17th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
5.9 expected goals per 60 on the power play32nd of 32
3.8 expected goals per 60 on the power play31st of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
7.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded17th of 32
6.1 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded8th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
0.9 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded14th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.08 more penalties taken than drawn per 6023rd of 32
1.24 more penalties taken than drawn per 6030th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who St. Louis leans on, and what they do best.
20:09 a game
#18 · Center · 0 P in 4 GP (0 G, 0 A)
- Most ice time
- L1 · Holloway, Snuggerud
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Creating chancestop 4%
- Finishingtop 5%
- Preventing chancestop 6%
- Power-play chancesbottom 4%
- Hittingbottom 18%
17:33 a game
#89 · Left wing · 1 P in 4 GP (0 G, 1 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L3 · Neighbours, Dvorsky
- PP2
- Kills penalties
- Staying out of the boxtop 17%
- Faceoffsbottom 5%
No clear strengths or weak spots yet.
17:30 a game
#21 · Right wing · 2 P in 4 GP (1 G, 1 A)
- L1 · Thomas, Holloway
- PP1
- Shooting volumetop 9%
- Staying out of the boxtop 15%
- Hardest shotTop 10
- Preventing chancesbottom 6%
- Shooting volumetop 14%
- Hardest shottop 9%
- Top speedbottom 11%
17:06 a game
#81 · Left wing · 0 P in 4 GP (0 G, 0 A)
- L1 · Thomas, Snuggerud
- PP1
- Creating chancestop 11%
- Staying out of the boxtop 11%
- Distance skatedtop 5%
- Takeawaysbottom 5%
- Distance skatedTop 5
22:58 a game
#17 · Defenseman · 0 P in 4 GP (0 G, 0 A)
- Most ice time
- P1 · Carlo
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Creating chancestop 22%
- Distance skatedTop 10
- Hittingbottom 1%
- Fast burstsTop 10
- Distance skatedtop 7%
- Hittingbottom 17%
22:34 a game
#6 · Defenseman · 2 P in 4 GP (0 G, 2 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P2 · Jiricek
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Staying out of the boxTop 5
- Drawing penaltiestop 7%
- Top speedTop 10
- Shot blockingbottom 8%
- Drawing penaltiestop 17%
- Creating his own chancestop 21%
- Fast burststop 12%
- Hardest shotbottom 7%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Blues players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (4 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Worth knowing
- L. Mailloux has not played this season. A. Jiricek is in his usual spot beside P. Broberg. That pair is getting 8:50 a game at 5-on-5, down from 11:56 with Mailloux.
- L19:44 a game
R. ThomasD. HollowayJ. Snuggerud
- Creates
- 3.29
- Allows
- 2.00
- Share
- 62.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 49%
- L210:44 a gamein 2 of last 4
J. BerggrenC. McMichaelM. McTavish
- Creates
- 3.20
- Allows
- 2.23
- Share
- 58.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 65%
- L38:32 a gamein 2 of last 4
P. BuchnevichJ. NeighboursD. Dvorsky
- Creates
- 2.41
- Allows
- 2.28
- Share
- 51.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 64%
- L46:40 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.52
- Allows
- 2.62
- Share
- 49.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- P112:50 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.96
- Allows
- 1.93
- Share
- 60.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 39%
- P210:54 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 3.14
- Allows
- 2.47
- Share
- 56.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 62%
- P3New8:55 last game
- Creates
- 2.80
- Allows
- 2.65
- Share
- 51.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 83%
Last game
Against San Jose Sharks, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each St. Louis group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Berggren, McMichael, McTavish (L2) have spent 36% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 25%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Thomas · Holloway · SnuggerudOpp. L134%Opp. L227%Opp. L326%Opp. L414%
- L2Berggren · McMichael · McTavishOpp. L117%Opp. L236%Opp. L329%Opp. L418%
- L3Buchnevich · Neighbours · DvorskyOpp. L120%Opp. L220%Opp. L337%Opp. L423%
- L4Johnston · Dube · SuterOpp. L135%Opp. L213%Opp. L328%Opp. L424%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Fowler · CarloOpp. L130%Opp. L219%Opp. L330%Opp. L420%
- P2Broberg · JiricekOpp. L122%Opp. L233%Opp. L325%Opp. L420%
- P3Parayko · BarronOpp. L123%Opp. L224%Opp. L333%Opp. L420%
Standing out at home
- Fowler, Carlo (P1) have spent 41% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 27%.
- Thomas, Holloway, Snuggerud (L1) have spent 40% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 27%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Thomas · Holloway · SnuggerudOpp. L140%Opp. L222%Opp. L319%Opp. L419%
- L2Berggren · McMichael · McTavishOpp. L121%Opp. L254%Opp. L311%Opp. L415%
- L3Buchnevich · Neighbours · DvorskyOpp. L18%Opp. L213%Opp. L353%Opp. L426%
- L4Johnston · Dube · SuterOpp. L136%Opp. L28%Opp. L325%Opp. L430%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Fowler · CarloOpp. L141%Opp. L216%Opp. L324%Opp. L419%
- P2Broberg · JiricekOpp. L18%Opp. L233%Opp. L333%Opp. L426%
- P3Parayko · BarronOpp. L126%Opp. L234%Opp. L320%Opp. L420%
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Thomas · Holloway · SnuggerudOpp. L131%Opp. L229%Opp. L328%Opp. L411%
- L2Berggren · McMichael · McTavishOpp. L116%Opp. L228%Opp. L337%Opp. L419%
- L3Buchnevich · Neighbours · DvorskyOpp. L126%Opp. L224%Opp. L329%Opp. L421%
- L4Johnston · Dube · SuterOpp. L135%Opp. L215%Opp. L329%Opp. L421%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Fowler · CarloOpp. L126%Opp. L221%Opp. L333%Opp. L421%
- P2Broberg · JiricekOpp. L128%Opp. L234%Opp. L321%Opp. L417%
- P3Parayko · BarronOpp. L122%Opp. L220%Opp. L338%Opp. L420%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one St. Louis group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against St. Louis, every St. Louis group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who St. Louis sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (4 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP153% of the time
Creates 5.9 expected goals per 60
- C. FowlerQuarterback
- D. Hollowayboth units
- J. SnuggerudTrigger
- R. ThomasDistributor
- M. McTavish
PP246% of the time
Creates 6.3 expected goals per 60
- A. JiricekQuarterback
- D. Hollowayboth units
- C. McMichael
- J. NeighboursDistributor
- P. BuchnevichTrigger
Penalty kill
Kills allow 7.5 expected goals per 60, 17th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 6.1 expected goals per 60, 8th of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- P. Buchnevich12 of 14 kills · 1:02 a kill
- R. Thomas13 of 14 kills · 0:53 a kill · takes the draw
- P. BrobergD14 of 14 kills · 1:08 a kill
- C. ParaykoD14 of 14 kills · 1:04 a kill
Second wave
- P. Suter14 of 14 kills · 0:57 a kill
- C. McMichael13 of 14 kills · 0:38 a kill
- D. Dube9 of 14 kills · 0:42 a kill
- C. FowlerD12 of 14 kills · 1:01 a kill
- B. CarloD12 of 14 kills · 0:57 a kill
Spot duty
- J. Neighbours5 of 14 kills · 0:35 a kill
- D. Holloway4 of 14 kills · 0:23 a kill
- J. BarronD2 of 14 kills · 0:56 a kill
- T. LindsteinD2 of 14 kills · 0:34 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
J. Hofer47 starts · 1322 shots faced, this season and last
+20.3 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .981 725 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .875 432 shots
- High-danger save %
- .691 165 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.36
- Quality starts
- 62%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. HoferHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+20.3 goals saved above expected in 47 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
28.3 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.36 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots; 22% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 62% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 15%
- Overall save %
- .910
J. Hofer3 starts · 71 shots faced, this season
+2.2 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 42 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .950 20 shots
- High-danger save %
- .556 9 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 23.8
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.34
- Quality starts
- 67%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. HoferHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+2.2 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
23.8 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.4% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 73 seconds between shots; 27% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 67% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .930
J. Binnington39 starts · 1046 shots faced, this season and last
−28.8 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .956 548 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .811 354 shots
- High-danger save %
- .701 144 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 26.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.3
- Quality starts
- 44%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. BinningtonHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−28.8 goals saved above expected in 39 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
26.5 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.3 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots; 24% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 44% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 46%
- Overall save %
- .872
J. Binnington1 start · 36 shots faced, this season
−2.4 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- .938 16 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .867 15 shots
- High-danger save %
- .400 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 36
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 2
- Quality starts
- 0%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for J. BinningtonHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−2.4 goals saved above expected in 1 starttoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
36 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
2 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 78 seconds between shots; 14% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 0% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 100%
- Overall save %
- .833
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How St. Louis’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: more of St. Louis’s goals come from everyday even-strength play; fewer from the power play and rebounds.
- Everyday even-strength play60.3%144 of 239
- Power play15.5%37 of 239
- Rebound4.6%11 of 239
- Empty net6.3%15 of 239
- Off a turnover6.3%15 of 239
- Goalie pulled2.9%7 of 239
- Shorthanded2.5%6 of 239
- Off a faceoff win1.7%4 of 239
239 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of St. Louis’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play33.3%3 of 9
- Power play0%0 of 9
- Rebound11.1%1 of 9
- Empty net22.2%2 of 9
- Off a turnover11.1%1 of 9
- Goalie pulled11.1%1 of 9
- Shorthanded11.1%1 of 9
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 9
9 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals St. Louis allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play56.6%151 of 267
- Power play19.9%53 of 267
- Rebound7.1%19 of 267
- Empty net5.2%14 of 267
- Off a turnover6%16 of 267
- Goalie pulled1.9%5 of 267
- Shorthanded1.5%4 of 267
- Off a faceoff win1.9%5 of 267
267 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals St. Louis allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play61.5%8 of 13
- Power play7.7%1 of 13
- Rebound0%0 of 13
- Empty net15.4%2 of 13
- Off a turnover15.4%2 of 13
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 13
- Shorthanded0%0 of 13
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 13
13 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.