Vancouver Canucks
2-3-0
All Canucks playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Vancouver plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 5 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 5 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
45.7 shot attempts per 6031st of 32
41.8 shot attempts per 6031st of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot17th of 32
a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot10th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.8% of chances come from rebounds1st of 32
23.5% of chances come from rebounds2nd of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
6.9% of chances come right after a turnover26th of 32
16.9% of chances come right after a turnover2nd of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
31.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen29th of 32
31.4% of shot attempts come from defensemen25th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
29.2% of shots come from within 20 feet28th of 32
27.0% of shots come from within 20 feet25th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
61.8 shot attempts allowed per 6030th of 32
63.1 shot attempts allowed per 6026th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.8% chance of scoring on the average shot against31st of 32
a 7.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against27th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.38 defensive breakdowns per 607th of 32
0.51 defensive breakdowns per 6020th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
−0.06 goals saved above expected per 6032nd of 32
−1.29 goals saved above expected per 6027th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
80.3 shots per 60, both teams combined22nd of 32
73.2 shots per 60, both teams combined28th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 100 (100 is league average)16th of 3222.9 forecheck plays recorded per 6014th of 32
forecheck score 98 (100 is league average)17th of 3224.6 forecheck plays recorded per 6013th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 98 (100 is league average)18th of 3226.8 hits recorded per 6017th of 32
hit score 95 (100 is league average)18th of 3228.9 hits recorded per 6019th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
43.4% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six7th of 32
43.9% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six9th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
7.0 expected goals per 60 on the power play24th of 32
4.3 expected goals per 60 on the power play30th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
8.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded31st of 32
11.6 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded32nd of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
1.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded10th of 32
1.3 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded8th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.01 more penalties drawn than taken per 6018th of 32
0.40 more penalties taken than drawn per 6023rd of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Vancouver leans on, and what they do best.
20:02 a game
#40 · Center · 8 P in 5 GP (2 G, 6 A)
- Most ice time
- L1 · DeBrusk, Lekkerimäki
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Shot blockingTop 10
- Staying out of the boxtop 9%
- Takeawaystop 12%
- Shooting volumebottom 8%
- Hittingtop 15%
- Setting up goalstop 21%
- Shooting volumebottom 15%
17:34 a game
#23 · Center · 4 P in 5 GP (3 G, 1 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L2 · Boeser, Cotter
- PP1
- Finishingtop 6%
- Takeawaystop 11%
- Power-play chancesbottom 3%
No clear strengths or weak spots yet.
17:32 a game
#6 · Right wing · 3 P in 5 GP (1 G, 2 A)
- L2 · Cotter, Rossi
- PP1
- Staying out of the box3rd
- Hardest shotTop 10
- Drawing penaltiesbottom 1%
- Fast burstsbottom 5%
16:39 a game
#74 · Left wing · 3 P in 3 GP (2 G, 1 A)
- L1 · Pettersson, Lekkerimäki
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Power-play chances3rd
- Top speedtop 7%
- Drawing penaltiesbottom 11%
- Takeawaystop 21%
- Distance skatedtop 13%
- Hardest shotbottom 13%
25:28 a game
#17 · Defenseman · 5 P in 5 GP (0 G, 5 A)
- Most ice time
- P1 · Buium
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Staying out of the boxtop 9%
- Shooting volumebottom 15%
- Shot blockingtop 7%
- Shooting volumebottom 22%
22:06 a game
#8 · Defenseman · 1 P in 5 GP (0 G, 1 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P1 · Hronek
- PP2
- Tough minutes
- Staying out of the boxtop 16%
- Drawing penaltiestop 23%
- Shot blockingbottom 4%
- Hittingbottom 24%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Canucks players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (5 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Worth knowing
- The forward lines keep changing. Even their four most-used trios over the last 5 games cover only 27% of their forwards’ 5-on-5 time, the second-lowest in the league (a typical team: 51%). The lines listed lean on their latest games, but expect new combinations tonight.
- P. Cotter has started killing penalties: on the ice for 30% of the team’s shorthanded time in 5 games, up from 0% last season.
- M. Sasson has started killing penalties: on the ice for 32% of the team’s shorthanded time in 5 games, up from 4% last season.
- A. Bains has started killing penalties: on the ice for 25% of the team’s shorthanded time in 5 games, up from 3% last season.
- L111:34 a gamein 2 of last 5
J. DeBruskE. PetterssonJ. Lekkerimäki
- Creates
- 3.07
- Allows
- 2.49
- Share
- 55.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 59%
- L2New6:46 last game
- Creates
- 2.94
- Allows
- 2.16
- Share
- 57.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 80%
- L3New6:31 last game
- Creates
- 2.34
- Allows
- 2.66
- Share
- 46.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- L4New5:29 last game
- Creates
- 2.36
- Allows
- 2.85
- Share
- 45.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- P111:48 a gamein 4 of last 5
- Creates
- 2.32
- Allows
- 2.24
- Share
- 50.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 45%
- P210:50 a game
- Creates
- 2.26
- Allows
- 2.89
- Share
- 43.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 35%
- P3New11:28 last game
- Creates
- 2.93
- Allows
- 3.20
- Share
- 47.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 33%
Last game
At Carolina Hurricanes, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Vancouver group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Karlsson, Ohgren, Sasson (L3) have spent 58% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 31%.
- Pettersson, Mancini (P3) have spent 36% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 18%.
- O'Connor, Räty, Bains (L4) have spent 32% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 16%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1DeBrusk · Pettersson · LekkerimäkiOpp. L142%Opp. L219%Opp. L328%Opp. L410%
- L2Boeser · Cotter · RossiOpp. L113%Opp. L236%Opp. L336%Opp. L415%
- L3Karlsson · Ohgren · SassonOpp. L158%Opp. L211%Opp. L313%Opp. L417%
- L4O'Connor · Räty · BainsOpp. L130%Opp. L220%Opp. L317%Opp. L432%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Hronek · BuiumOpp. L142%Opp. L219%Opp. L324%Opp. L414%
- P2Oleksiak · WillanderOpp. L133%Opp. L225%Opp. L327%Opp. L416%
- P3Pettersson · ManciniOpp. L112%Opp. L217%Opp. L335%Opp. L436%
Standing out at home
- Boeser, Cotter, Rossi (L2) have spent 37% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 27%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1DeBrusk · Pettersson · LekkerimäkiOpp. L128%Opp. L241%Opp. L324%Opp. L48%
- L2Boeser · Cotter · RossiOpp. L113%Opp. L235%Opp. L337%Opp. L416%
- L3Karlsson · Ohgren · SassonOpp. L166%Opp. L212%Opp. L310%Opp. L412%
- L4O'Connor · Räty · BainsOpp. L134%Opp. L220%Opp. L323%Opp. L423%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Hronek · BuiumOpp. L144%Opp. L223%Opp. L322%Opp. L411%
- P2Oleksiak · WillanderOpp. L126%Opp. L226%Opp. L332%Opp. L416%
- P3Pettersson · ManciniOpp. L119%Opp. L210%Opp. L339%Opp. L432%
Standing out on the road
- Boeser, Cotter, Rossi (L2) have spent 38% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 21%.
- DeBrusk, Pettersson, Lekkerimäki (L1) have spent 49% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 34%.
- Pettersson, Mancini (P3) have spent 38% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 23%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1DeBrusk · Pettersson · LekkerimäkiOpp. L149%Opp. L29%Opp. L330%Opp. L412%
- L2Boeser · Cotter · RossiOpp. L114%Opp. L238%Opp. L335%Opp. L413%
- L3Karlsson · Ohgren · SassonOpp. L150%Opp. L211%Opp. L317%Opp. L422%
- L4O'Connor · Räty · BainsOpp. L125%Opp. L220%Opp. L37%Opp. L448%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1Hronek · BuiumOpp. L139%Opp. L213%Opp. L329%Opp. L419%
- P2Oleksiak · WillanderOpp. L143%Opp. L223%Opp. L319%Opp. L415%
- P3Pettersson · ManciniOpp. L18%Opp. L222%Opp. L332%Opp. L438%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Vancouver group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Vancouver, every Vancouver group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Vancouver sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (5 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP161% of the time
Creates 6.0 expected goals per 60
- F. HronekQuarterback
- E. Pettersson
- B. BoeserDistributor
- M. Rossi
- J. DeBruskTrigger
PP238% of the time
Creates 5.8 expected goals per 60
- Z. BuiumQuarterback
- T. WillanderPoint
- L. KarlssonTrigger
- J. Lekkerimäki
- L. OhgrenNet-front
Penalty kill
Kills allow 8.5 expected goals per 60, 31st of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 11.6 expected goals per 60, 32nd of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- D. O'Connor14 of 17 kills · 0:43 a kill
- F. HronekD17 of 17 kills · 0:56 a kill
- J. OleksiakD15 of 17 kills · 0:51 a kill
Second wave
- M. Sasson14 of 17 kills · 0:37 a kill · takes the draw
- E. Pettersson14 of 17 kills · 0:36 a kill · takes the draw
- L. Ohgren12 of 17 kills · 0:41 a kill
- P. Cotter13 of 17 kills · 0:37 a kill
- A. Bains11 of 17 kills · 0:36 a kill
- E. PetterssonD14 of 17 kills · 0:56 a kill
- L. SchennD10 of 17 kills · 0:40 a kill
Spot duty
- B. Gallagher3 of 17 kills · 0:33 a kill
- T. WillanderD5 of 17 kills · 0:37 a kill
- V. ManciniD2 of 17 kills · 0:54 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
K. Lankinen48 starts · 1389 shots faced, this season and last
−23.7 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .962 660 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .858 507 shots
- High-danger save %
- .617 222 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 30
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.39
- Quality starts
- 44%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for K. LankinenHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−23.7 goals saved above expected in 48 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
30 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.6% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.39 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 66 seconds between shots; 20% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 44% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 38%
- Overall save %
- .869
K. Lankinen3 starts · 104 shots faced, this season
−8.1 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .905 42 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .897 29 shots
- High-danger save %
- .545 33 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 33.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 33%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for K. LankinenHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−8.1 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
33.3 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 9.6% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 60 seconds between shots; 17% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 33% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 33%
- Overall save %
- .788
L. Meriläinen21 starts · 507 shots faced, this season and last
−16.4 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .963 272 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .834 169 shots
- High-danger save %
- .561 66 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.15
- Quality starts
- 43%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for L. MeriläinenHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−16.4 goals saved above expected in 21 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
25.2 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.15 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots; 24% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 43% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 29%
- Overall save %
- .868
L. Meriläinen2 starts · 50 shots faced, this season
+1.7 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 24 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .857 21 shots
- High-danger save %
- 1.000 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 27.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.54
- Quality starts
- 100%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for L. MeriläinenHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+1.7 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
27.1 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.3% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.54 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 86 seconds between shots; 26% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 100% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .940
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Vancouver’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: more of Vancouver’s goals come from the power play; fewer from empty nets.
- Everyday even-strength play51.5%119 of 231
- Power play23.4%54 of 231
- Rebound8.7%20 of 231
- Empty net3.9%9 of 231
- Off a turnover3.9%9 of 231
- Goalie pulled3%7 of 231
- Shorthanded3.5%8 of 231
- Off a faceoff win2.2%5 of 231
231 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of Vancouver’s goals come from rebounds.
- Everyday even-strength play52.4%11 of 21
- Power play14.3%3 of 21
- Rebound19%4 of 21
- Empty net4.8%1 of 21
- Off a turnover4.8%1 of 21
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 21
- Shorthanded4.8%1 of 21
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 21
21 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Vancouver allows come from faceoff wins; fewer from turnovers.
- Everyday even-strength play55.2%187 of 339
- Power play20.1%68 of 339
- Rebound7.7%26 of 339
- Empty net7.1%24 of 339
- Off a turnover3.2%11 of 339
- Goalie pulled2.4%8 of 339
- Shorthanded1.8%6 of 339
- Off a faceoff win2.7%9 of 339
339 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Vancouver allows come from shorthanded play and faceoff wins; fewer from everyday even-strength play.
- Everyday even-strength play40%10 of 25
- Power play28%7 of 25
- Rebound8%2 of 25
- Empty net0%0 of 25
- Off a turnover0%0 of 25
- Goalie pulled4%1 of 25
- Shorthanded12%3 of 25
- Off a faceoff win8%2 of 25
25 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.