Winnipeg Jets
3-1-1
All Jets playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Winnipeg plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 5 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 5 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
53.8 shot attempts per 6023rd of 32
53.9 shot attempts per 6021st of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 5.8% chance of scoring on the average shot30th of 32
a 5.4% chance of scoring on the average shot29th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.2% of chances come from rebounds19th of 32
10.0% of chances come from rebounds15th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
7.0% of chances come right after a turnover23rd of 32
11.5% of chances come right after a turnover9th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
35.3% of shot attempts come from defensemen14th of 32
33.8% of shot attempts come from defensemen18th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
29.3% of shots come from within 20 feet26th of 32
24.7% of shots come from within 20 feet31st of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
58.8 shot attempts allowed per 6023rd of 32
63.4 shot attempts allowed per 6028th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against18th of 32
a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against19th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.37 defensive breakdowns per 602nd of 32
0.25 defensive breakdowns per 609th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.13 goals saved above expected per 608th of 32
+0.41 goals saved above expected per 6015th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
82.9 shots per 60, both teams combined11th of 32
90.1 shots per 60, both teams combined4th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 81 (100 is league average)31st of 3218.8 forecheck plays recorded per 6029th of 32
forecheck score 75 (100 is league average)29th of 3218.7 forecheck plays recorded per 6029th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 89 (100 is league average)25th of 3224.0 hits recorded per 6025th of 32
hit score 77 (100 is league average)26th of 3222.6 hits recorded per 6028th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
40.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six26th of 32
41.0% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six23rd of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
7.2 expected goals per 60 on the power play22nd of 32
7.9 expected goals per 60 on the power play10th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
7.3 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded11th of 32
7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded21st of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded6th of 32
0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded18th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.12 more penalties drawn than taken per 607th of 32
0.40 more penalties drawn than taken per 6010th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Winnipeg leans on, and what they do best.
21:22 a game
#81 · Left wing · 8 P in 5 GP (6 G, 2 A)
- Most ice time
- L1 · Scheifele, Perfetti
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- FinishingTop 10
- Shorthanded threat3rd
- Staying out of the boxTop 10
- Preventing chancesbottom 9%
- Shooting volumetop 13%
- Finishingtop 17%
- Creating his own chancestop 18%
- Preventing chancesbottom 17%
21:18 a game
#55 · Center · 3 P in 5 GP (0 G, 3 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L1 · Connor, Perfetti
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Setting up goalsTop 5
- Finishingtop 5%
- Staying out of the boxtop 11%
- Preventing chancesbottom 2%
- Setting up goalstop 24%
- Hardest shottop 6%
- Hittingbottom 20%
19:07 a game
#91 · Center · 6 P in 5 GP (3 G, 3 A)
- L1 · Scheifele, Connor
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Takeawaystop 4%
- Preventing chancestop 9%
- Shooting volumetop 13%
- Finishingbottom 5%
- Preventing chancesbottom 19%
16:17 a game
#13 · Center · 2 P in 5 GP (0 G, 2 A)
- L2 · Barron, Björck
- PP1
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Creating chancestop 14%
- Drawing penaltiestop 18%
- Hittingbottom 2%
- Hittingbottom 9%
23:21 a game
#4 · Defenseman · 1 P in 5 GP (0 G, 1 A)
- Most ice time
- P2 · Ferraro
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Shooting volumetop 22%
- Hittingtop 22%
- Preventing chancesbottom 22%
- Hardest shottop 15%
- Preventing chancesbottom 7%
22:14 a game
#54 · Defenseman · 2 P in 5 GP (0 G, 2 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P1 · DeMelo
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Tough minutes
- Preventing chancesTop 10
- Staying out of the boxtop 12%
- Takeawaystop 15%
- Finishingbottom 7%
- Hardest shotTop 10
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Jets players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (5 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
- L113:52 a game
M. ScheifeleK. ConnorC. Perfetti
- Creates
- 3.40
- Allows
- 2.84
- Share
- 54.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 65%
- L2New9:53 last game
- Creates
- 2.92
- Allows
- 2.01
- Share
- 59.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 67%
- L3New9:05 last game
- Creates
- 2.69
- Allows
- 2.24
- Share
- 54.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- L45:51 a gamein 2 of last 5
V. NamestnikovC. KoepkeB. Lambert
- Creates
- 2.31
- Allows
- 3.33
- Share
- 40.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 71%
- P113:44 a gamein 2 of last 5
- Creates
- 2.64
- Allows
- 2.04
- Share
- 56.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 39%
- P2New13:58 last game
- Creates
- 2.49
- Allows
- 2.80
- Share
- 47.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 31%
- P3New6:54 last game
- Creates
- 2.72
- Allows
- 2.86
- Share
- 48.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 83%
Last game
Against Anaheim Ducks, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Winnipeg group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Lowry, Iafallo, Rosen (L3) have spent 50% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 25%.
- Namestnikov, Koepke, Lambert (L4) have spent 42% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 23%.
- Scheifele, Connor, Perfetti (L1) have spent 41% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 29%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Scheifele · Connor · PerfettiOpp. L123%Opp. L220%Opp. L341%Opp. L416%
- L2Vilardi · Barron · BjörckOpp. L127%Opp. L224%Opp. L318%Opp. L432%
- L3Lowry · Iafallo · RosenOpp. L110%Opp. L250%Opp. L331%Opp. L49%
- L4Namestnikov · Koepke · LambertOpp. L136%Opp. L213%Opp. L39%Opp. L442%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1DeMelo · SambergOpp. L125%Opp. L228%Opp. L328%Opp. L419%
- P2Ferraro · PionkOpp. L125%Opp. L222%Opp. L329%Opp. L423%
- P3Fleury · BauerOpp. L117%Opp. L266%Opp. L38%Opp. L49%
Standing out at home
- Lowry, Iafallo, Rosen (L3) have spent 53% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 23%.
- Namestnikov, Koepke, Lambert (L4) have spent 47% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 25%.
- Scheifele, Connor, Perfetti (L1) have spent 38% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 26%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Scheifele · Connor · PerfettiOpp. L128%Opp. L212%Opp. L338%Opp. L423%
- L2Vilardi · Barron · BjörckOpp. L136%Opp. L225%Opp. L310%Opp. L429%
- L3Lowry · Iafallo · RosenOpp. L10%Opp. L253%Opp. L336%Opp. L410%
- L4Namestnikov · Koepke · LambertOpp. L132%Opp. L29%Opp. L313%Opp. L447%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1DeMelo · SambergOpp. L125%Opp. L223%Opp. L329%Opp. L424%
- P2Ferraro · PionkOpp. L128%Opp. L215%Opp. L330%Opp. L427%
- P3Fleury · BauerOpp. L118%Opp. L267%Opp. L35%Opp. L410%
Standing out on the road
- Vilardi, Barron, Björck (L2) have spent 38% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 17%.
- Scheifele, Connor, Perfetti (L1) have spent 47% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 33%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Scheifele · Connor · PerfettiOpp. L115%Opp. L233%Opp. L347%Opp. L44%
- L2Vilardi · Barron · BjörckOpp. L18%Opp. L221%Opp. L333%Opp. L438%
- L3Lowry · Iafallo · RosenOpp. L164%Opp. L236%Opp. L30%Opp. L40%
- L4Namestnikov · Koepke · LambertOpp. L146%Opp. L224%Opp. L30%Opp. L430%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1DeMelo · SambergOpp. L126%Opp. L235%Opp. L328%Opp. L410%
- P2Ferraro · PionkOpp. L117%Opp. L239%Opp. L329%Opp. L416%
- P3Fleury · BauerOpp. L10%Opp. L258%Opp. L342%Opp. L40%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Winnipeg group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Winnipeg, every Winnipeg group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Winnipeg sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (5 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP149% of the time
Creates 6.3 expected goals per 60
- N. PionkQuarterback
- K. Connorboth unitsDistributor
- M. Scheifeleboth units
- G. Vilardiboth unitsTrigger
- C. Perfettiboth unitsNet-front
PP239% of the time
Creates 9.3 expected goals per 60
- J. MorrisseyQuarterback
- K. Connorboth unitsDistributor
- M. Scheifeleboth units
- G. Vilardiboth unitsTrigger
- C. Perfettiboth unitsNet-front
Penalty kill
Kills allow 7.3 expected goals per 60, 11th of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 7.4 expected goals per 60, 21st of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- M. Barron10 of 11 kills · 0:59 a kill
- A. Lowry11 of 11 kills · 0:46 a kill · takes the draw
- M. FerraroD10 of 11 kills · 0:58 a kill
- D. DeMeloD9 of 11 kills · 1:02 a kill
Second wave
- A. Iafallo9 of 11 kills · 0:45 a kill
- K. Connor8 of 11 kills · 0:40 a kill
- V. Namestnikov7 of 11 kills · 0:44 a kill
- V. Björck7 of 11 kills · 0:35 a kill
- N. PionkD11 of 11 kills · 1:01 a kill
- D. SambergD10 of 11 kills · 1:01 a kill
Spot duty
- C. Koepke4 of 11 kills · 0:34 a kill
- J. MorrisseyD3 of 11 kills · 0:37 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
S. Skinner51 starts · 1367 shots faced, this season and last
+13.4 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .975 640 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .885 503 shots
- High-danger save %
- .661 224 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 26.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.35
- Quality starts
- 53%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for S. SkinnerHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+13.4 goals saved above expected in 51 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
26.4 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.35 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 74 seconds between shots; 22% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 53% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 20%
- Overall save %
- .890
S. Skinner3 starts · 100 shots faced, this season
+2.2 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .982 56 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .912 34 shots
- High-danger save %
- .600 10 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 32.7
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 67%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for S. SkinnerHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+2.2 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
32.7 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.1% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 68 seconds between shots; 20% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 67% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .920
C. Stevenson6 starts · 148 shots faced, this season and last
+3.0 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- .966 87 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .927 41 shots
- High-danger save %
- .600 20 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.01
- Quality starts
- 50%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for C. StevensonHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
+3.0 goals saved above expected in 6 startstoo few starts to place him
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
25 shots faced per 60too few starts to place him
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.0% chance of going intoo few starts to place him
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
1.01 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60too few starts to place him
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 86 seconds between shots; 29% come after three quiet minutestoo few starts to place him
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 50% of the timetoo few starts to place him
- Really bad starts
- 17%
- Overall save %
- .905
C. Stevenson2 starts · 47 shots faced, this season
−0.2 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .960 25 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .933 15 shots
- High-danger save %
- .429 7 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 24.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.52
- Quality starts
- 50%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for C. StevensonHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−0.2 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
24.3 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 7.8% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.52 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 84 seconds between shots; 26% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 50% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 50%
- Overall save %
- .872
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Winnipeg’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
Every row of Winnipeg’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play56.8%137 of 241
- Power play19.1%46 of 241
- Rebound8.7%21 of 241
- Empty net5.4%13 of 241
- Off a turnover3.3%8 of 241
- Goalie pulled2.1%5 of 241
- Shorthanded2.1%5 of 241
- Off a faceoff win2.5%6 of 241
241 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of Winnipeg’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play53.8%7 of 13
- Power play30.8%4 of 13
- Rebound15.4%2 of 13
- Empty net0%0 of 13
- Off a turnover0%0 of 13
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 13
- Shorthanded0%0 of 13
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 13
13 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals Winnipeg allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play57.8%156 of 270
- Power play18.5%50 of 270
- Rebound7.4%20 of 270
- Empty net5.6%15 of 270
- Off a turnover3.3%9 of 270
- Goalie pulled4.1%11 of 270
- Shorthanded1.5%4 of 270
- Off a faceoff win1.9%5 of 270
270 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals Winnipeg allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play66.7%10 of 15
- Power play6.7%1 of 15
- Rebound6.7%1 of 15
- Empty net6.7%1 of 15
- Off a turnover6.7%1 of 15
- Goalie pulled6.7%1 of 15
- Shorthanded0%0 of 15
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 15
15 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.