Real data. Everything on this page is computed from actual games.
Spare Line Change
Numbers from
Hits and takeaways

Wednesday, September 30

7:30 PM ET · Xfinity Mobile Arena

The short version

Before the game

The matchup inside the matchup

It’s strength against strength: the Penguins for chance quality, the Flyers at preventing dangerous shots. The Flyers and the Penguins sit at opposite ends for physicality. Philadelphia has controlled the play far better over recent games and has home ice. Pittsburgh’s way back in is keeping shots to a minimum.

It’s strength against strength: the Penguins for chance quality, the Flyers at preventing dangerous shots. The Flyers and the Penguins sit at opposite ends for physicality. Philadelphia has controlled the play far better over recent games and has home ice. Pittsburgh can pull it off if they keep shots to a minimum.

  1. The matchup inside the matchup

    The Penguins are one of the league’s best for chance quality, and the Flyers are one of the league’s best at preventing dangerous shots. Our lean: the Penguins’ chance quality wins out.

    The call The Penguins’ chances are more dangerous than the league average (a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot) against the Flyers.

    Pittsburgh 5th for chance quality (a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot) · Philadelphia 5th for preventing dangerous shots

    Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 0 and 0 games this season

  2. Something has to give

    The Flyers are near the top of the league for the power play, and the Penguins are near the top of the league at the penalty kill. Our lean: the Penguins’ kill holds up, even though power plays usually win these.

    The call The Penguins’ kill holds the Flyers’ power play under the league-average 7.6 expected goals per 60.

    Philadelphia 7th for the power play (7.8 expected goals per 60) · Pittsburgh 6th for the penalty kill

    Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 0 and 0 games this season

  3. Bruisers against finesse

    The Flyers are near the top of the league for physicality, at the bruising end; the Penguins are one of the league’s worst, at the finesse end. Expect that gap to show.

    The call The Flyers hit more than the Penguins in the close stretches of the game.

    Physicality: Philadelphia 8th, Pittsburgh 31st

    Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 0 and 0 games this season

These calls are written by fixed rules from the numbers below, and saved as they stand at puck drop. After the game, each one will be checked against what happened.

Style fingerprints

How Pittsburgh and Philadelphia play, trait by trait, on the same scales.

Pittsburgh PenguinsPhiladelphia FlyersLeague averageLikely range

Each scale runs from the league’s lowest team on the left to its highest on the right. Numbers blend last season with the 0 and 0 games played so far; traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.

This season only: 0 games for Pittsburgh, 0 for Philadelphia. Expect these to swing a lot, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.

The biggest differences

Show all 18 traitsHide the full set

Offense

  • Shot volume
    SelectiveRelentless
    • Pittsburgh: 58.7 shot attempts per 609th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 50.3 shot attempts per 6030th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Shot quality
    HopefulDangerous
    • Pittsburgh: a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot5th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot4th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Second chances
    One-and-doneCrashers
    • Pittsburgh: 10.0% of chances come from rebounds27th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 10.1% of chances come from rebounds25th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Off-turnover offense
    PatientOpportunist
    • Pittsburgh: 7.5% of chances come right after a turnover12th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 8.0% of chances come right after a turnover2nd of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Shots from defensemen
    Forward-ledActive D
    • Pittsburgh: 33.0% of shot attempts come from defensemen23rd of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 32.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen25th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Shots from in close
    From distanceIn close
    • Pittsburgh: 33.6% of shots come from within 20 feet1st of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 32.0% of shots come from within 20 feet3rd of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

Defense

  • Shot suppression
    PorousStingy
    • Pittsburgh: 56.9 shot attempts allowed per 6016th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 55.2 shot attempts allowed per 6010th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Quality allowed
    ExposedSheltered
    • Pittsburgh: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot against24th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against5th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Breakdowns avoided
    Fire drillComposed
    • Pittsburgh: 0.40 defensive breakdowns per 6015th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 0.39 defensive breakdowns per 6010th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Goaltending
    SieveWall
    • Pittsburgh: +0.10 goals saved above expected per 6018th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: +0.05 goals saved above expected per 6024th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

Tempo and edge

  • Pace
    SlogTrack meet
    • Pittsburgh: 83.2 shots per 60, both teams combined9th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 76.1 shots per 60, both teams combined31st of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Forecheck pressure
    PassiveHounding
    • Pittsburgh: forecheck score 85 (100 is league average)32nd of 32Pittsburgh: 18.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6031st of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: forecheck score 105 (100 is league average)9th of 32Philadelphia: 22.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6013th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Physicality
    FinesseBruising
    • Pittsburgh: hit score 82 (100 is league average)31st of 32Pittsburgh: 20.2 hits recorded per 6031st of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: hit score 111 (100 is league average)8th of 32Philadelphia: 27.1 hits recorded per 608th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Depth
    Top-heavyDeep
    • Pittsburgh: 43.4% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six2nd of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 42.5% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six10th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

Special teams

  • Power play
    HarmlessLethal
    • Pittsburgh: 7.6 expected goals per 60 on the power play13th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 7.8 expected goals per 60 on the power play7th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Penalty kill
    LeakyAirtight
    • Pittsburgh: 7.0 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded6th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded14th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Power kill
    BunkeredPredatory
    • Pittsburgh: 0.9 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded15th of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 0.8 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded19th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

  • Discipline
    RecklessClean
    • Pittsburgh: 0.05 more penalties taken than drawn per 6021st of 32

      Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season

    • Philadelphia: 0.13 more penalties taken than drawn per 6029th of 32

      Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season

Forecheck pressure and physicality are arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.

Lines and deployment

Philadelphia is at home, so their coach changes last and chooses who plays against whom.

How good, against the same line or pair on other teamsHow much, low to high (not good or bad)

Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over each team’s last 10 games (0 and 0 so far), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.

Who Philadelphia is likely to send against whom

Philadelphia has not played at home yet this season, so there is no matching habit to show.

Special teams

Each power play set against the penalty killers it will face.

Show

Pittsburgh power play against Philadelphia penalty kill

  • Pittsburgh power play

    7.6 expected goals per 60 · 13th of 32

  • Philadelphia penalty kill

    7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 · 14th of 32

Pittsburgh power play

 

Philadelphia penalty kill

No penalties killed in this stretch yet.

Units and penalty-kill roles use each team’s last 10 games; power-play role tags use this season and last, counting only games with the player’s current team; the map shows the last 140 power-play shots. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.

Goaltending

Is each goalie stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?

Showagainst

Helping, or hung out to dry?

System and goalie both goodGoalie bailing them outGoalie giving back what the system earnsTrouble everywhereTeam allows fewer chances ← → more chances
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
  • Stopping more than expected
    SieveWall
    • How busy he is
      QuietUnder siege
      • How dangerous the shots are
        ShelteredExposed
        • Breakdowns in front of him
          RareConstant
          • Waiting between shots
            Steady workLong waits
            • Night-to-night steadiness
              StreakySteady

              Helping, or hung out to dry?

              System and goalie both goodGoalie bailing them outGoalie giving back what the system earnsTrouble everywhereTeam allows fewer chances ← → more chances
              Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
              • Stopping more than expected
                SieveWall
                • How busy he is
                  QuietUnder siege
                  • How dangerous the shots are
                    ShelteredExposed
                    • Breakdowns in front of him
                      RareConstant
                      • Waiting between shots
                        Steady workLong waits
                        • Night-to-night steadiness
                          StreakySteady

                          The menus list every goalie on each team, busiest this season first; the site does not yet know who will start. Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up many cross-ice passes looks worse here than he really is.

                          Where the goals come from

                          How each team’s goals are scored, or allowed, against the league average.

                          Show goals
                          PittsburghPhiladelphiaLeague average
                          • Everyday even-strength play–%–%
                          • Power play–%–%
                          • Rebound–%–%
                          • Empty net–%–%
                          • Off a turnover–%–%
                          • Goalie pulled–%–%
                          • Shorthanded–%–%
                          • Off a faceoff win–%–%

                          0 Pittsburgh goals and 0 Philadelphia goals scored this season and last. Each row has its own scale.

                          • Everyday even-strength play–%–%
                          • Power play–%–%
                          • Rebound–%–%
                          • Empty net–%–%
                          • Off a turnover–%–%
                          • Goalie pulled–%–%
                          • Shorthanded–%–%
                          • Off a faceoff win–%–%

                          0 Pittsburgh goals and 0 Philadelphia goals scored this season. Each row has its own scale.

                          These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last. Each team page shows how much luck alone can move each row.

                          Data notes

                          Team pages: Pittsburgh Penguins · Philadelphia Flyers