Wednesday, September 30
7:30 PM ET · Xfinity Mobile Arena
The short version
Before the game
The matchup inside the matchup
It’s strength against strength: the Penguins for chance quality, the Flyers at preventing dangerous shots. The Flyers and the Penguins sit at opposite ends for physicality. Philadelphia has controlled the play far better over recent games and has home ice. Pittsburgh’s way back in is keeping shots to a minimum.
It’s strength against strength: the Penguins for chance quality, the Flyers at preventing dangerous shots. The Flyers and the Penguins sit at opposite ends for physicality. Philadelphia has controlled the play far better over recent games and has home ice. Pittsburgh can pull it off if they keep shots to a minimum.
The matchup inside the matchup
The Penguins are one of the league’s best for chance quality, and the Flyers are one of the league’s best at preventing dangerous shots. Our lean: the Penguins’ chance quality wins out.
The call The Penguins’ chances are more dangerous than the league average (a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot) against the Flyers.
Pittsburgh 5th for chance quality (a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot) · Philadelphia 5th for preventing dangerous shots
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 0 and 0 games this season
Something has to give
The Flyers are near the top of the league for the power play, and the Penguins are near the top of the league at the penalty kill. Our lean: the Penguins’ kill holds up, even though power plays usually win these.
The call The Penguins’ kill holds the Flyers’ power play under the league-average 7.6 expected goals per 60.
Philadelphia 7th for the power play (7.8 expected goals per 60) · Pittsburgh 6th for the penalty kill
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 0 and 0 games this season
Bruisers against finesse
The Flyers are near the top of the league for physicality, at the bruising end; the Penguins are one of the league’s worst, at the finesse end. Expect that gap to show.
The call The Flyers hit more than the Penguins in the close stretches of the game.
Physicality: Philadelphia 8th, Pittsburgh 31st
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 0 and 0 games this season
These calls are written by fixed rules from the numbers below, and saved as they stand at puck drop. After the game, each one will be checked against what happened.
Style fingerprints
How Pittsburgh and Philadelphia play, trait by trait, on the same scales.
Each scale runs from the league’s lowest team on the left to its highest on the right. Numbers blend last season with the 0 and 0 games played so far; traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
This season only: 0 games for Pittsburgh, 0 for Philadelphia. Expect these to swing a lot, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
The biggest differences
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
Pittsburgh: hit score 82 (100 is league average)31st of 32Pittsburgh: 20.2 hits recorded per 6031st of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: hit score 111 (100 is league average)8th of 32Philadelphia: 27.1 hits recorded per 608th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
Pittsburgh: forecheck score 85 (100 is league average)32nd of 32Pittsburgh: 18.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6031st of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: forecheck score 105 (100 is league average)9th of 32Philadelphia: 22.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6013th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- PaceSlogTrack meet
Pittsburgh: 83.2 shots per 60, both teams combined9th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 76.1 shots per 60, both teams combined31st of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
Pittsburgh: 58.7 shot attempts per 609th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 50.3 shot attempts per 6030th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
Pittsburgh: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot against24th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against5th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
Pittsburgh: 7.5% of chances come right after a turnover12th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 8.0% of chances come right after a turnover2nd of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
Show all 18 traitsHide the full set
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
Pittsburgh: 58.7 shot attempts per 609th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 50.3 shot attempts per 6030th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
Pittsburgh: a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot5th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot4th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
Pittsburgh: 10.0% of chances come from rebounds27th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 10.1% of chances come from rebounds25th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
Pittsburgh: 7.5% of chances come right after a turnover12th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 8.0% of chances come right after a turnover2nd of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
Pittsburgh: 33.0% of shot attempts come from defensemen23rd of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 32.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen25th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
Pittsburgh: 33.6% of shots come from within 20 feet1st of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 32.0% of shots come from within 20 feet3rd of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
Pittsburgh: 56.9 shot attempts allowed per 6016th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 55.2 shot attempts allowed per 6010th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
Pittsburgh: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot against24th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against5th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
Pittsburgh: 0.40 defensive breakdowns per 6015th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 0.39 defensive breakdowns per 6010th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- GoaltendingSieveWall
Pittsburgh: +0.10 goals saved above expected per 6018th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: +0.05 goals saved above expected per 6024th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
Pittsburgh: 83.2 shots per 60, both teams combined9th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 76.1 shots per 60, both teams combined31st of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
Pittsburgh: forecheck score 85 (100 is league average)32nd of 32Pittsburgh: 18.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6031st of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: forecheck score 105 (100 is league average)9th of 32Philadelphia: 22.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6013th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
Pittsburgh: hit score 82 (100 is league average)31st of 32Pittsburgh: 20.2 hits recorded per 6031st of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: hit score 111 (100 is league average)8th of 32Philadelphia: 27.1 hits recorded per 608th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
Pittsburgh: 43.4% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six2nd of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 42.5% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six10th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
Pittsburgh: 7.6 expected goals per 60 on the power play13th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 7.8 expected goals per 60 on the power play7th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
Pittsburgh: 7.0 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded6th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded14th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
Pittsburgh: 0.9 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded15th of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 0.8 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded19th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
- DisciplineRecklessClean
Pittsburgh: 0.05 more penalties taken than drawn per 6021st of 32
Pittsburgh: nothing to show yet this season
Philadelphia: 0.13 more penalties taken than drawn per 6029th of 32
Philadelphia: nothing to show yet this season
Forecheck pressure and physicality are arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Lines and deployment
Philadelphia is at home, so their coach changes last and chooses who plays against whom.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over each team’s last 10 games (0 and 0 so far), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Who Philadelphia is likely to send against whom
Philadelphia has not played at home yet this season, so there is no matching habit to show.
Special teams
Each power play set against the penalty killers it will face.
Pittsburgh power play against Philadelphia penalty kill
Pittsburgh power play
7.6 expected goals per 60 · 13th of 32
Philadelphia penalty kill
7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 · 14th of 32
Pittsburgh power play
Philadelphia penalty kill
No penalties killed in this stretch yet.
Philadelphia power play against Pittsburgh penalty kill
Philadelphia power play
7.8 expected goals per 60 · 7th of 32
Pittsburgh penalty kill
7.0 expected goals allowed per 60 · 6th of 32
Philadelphia power play
Pittsburgh penalty kill
No penalties killed in this stretch yet.
Units and penalty-kill roles use each team’s last 10 games; power-play role tags use this season and last, counting only games with the player’s current team; the map shows the last 140 power-play shots. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Goaltending
Is each goalie stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
The menus list every goalie on each team, busiest this season first; the site does not yet know who will start. Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up many cross-ice passes looks worse here than he really is.
Where the goals come from
How each team’s goals are scored, or allowed, against the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play–%–%
- Power play–%–%
- Rebound–%–%
- Empty net–%–%
- Off a turnover–%–%
- Goalie pulled–%–%
- Shorthanded–%–%
- Off a faceoff win–%–%
0 Pittsburgh goals and 0 Philadelphia goals scored this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play–%–%
- Power play–%–%
- Rebound–%–%
- Empty net–%–%
- Off a turnover–%–%
- Goalie pulled–%–%
- Shorthanded–%–%
- Off a faceoff win–%–%
0 Pittsburgh goals and 0 Philadelphia goals scored this season. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play–%–%
- Power play–%–%
- Rebound–%–%
- Empty net–%–%
- Off a turnover–%–%
- Goalie pulled–%–%
- Shorthanded–%–%
- Off a faceoff win–%–%
0 Pittsburgh goals and 0 Philadelphia goals allowed this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play–%–%
- Power play–%–%
- Rebound–%–%
- Empty net–%–%
- Off a turnover–%–%
- Goalie pulled–%–%
- Shorthanded–%–%
- Off a faceoff win–%–%
0 Pittsburgh goals and 0 Philadelphia goals allowed this season. Each row has its own scale.
These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last. Each team page shows how much luck alone can move each row.
Data notes
- Sources. Game data from the NHL; expected goals from this site’s own model, cross-checked against MoneyPuck.com.
- Early season. Pittsburgh has played 0 games and Philadelphia 0, so most numbers blend this season with last. The season switch at the top shows this season alone.
- Percentiles and ranks compare a team or player with the rest of the league: 90 means better than 90% of the league at that thing.
- Blind spots. Public game data doesn’t record passes before a shot, where defenders are standing, or rushes up the ice, so the site shows none of those.
- Hits, giveaways and takeaways depend on each arena’s scorer; anything built on them is arena-adjusted. How it works.
- Key players for each side are on the team pages.
Team pages: Pittsburgh Penguins · Philadelphia Flyers