Vegas Golden Knights
4-1-0
All Golden Knights playersResults and schedule
Recent results
Coming up
Style fingerprint
How Vegas plays, trait by trait, against the rest of the league.
Real numbers through Oct 10: 5 games this season, blended with last season. Traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
Real numbers through Oct 10, from this season’s 5 games only. Expect these to swing a lot this early, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
61.2 shot attempts per 607th of 32
63.9 shot attempts per 607th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot11th of 32
a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot16th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
10.3% of chances come from rebounds13th of 32
16.6% of chances come from rebounds6th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
6.7% of chances come right after a turnover31st of 32
4.6% of chances come right after a turnover24th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
36.2% of shot attempts come from defensemen6th of 32
36.4% of shot attempts come from defensemen8th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
30.9% of shots come from within 20 feet13th of 32
31.5% of shots come from within 20 feet19th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
51.5 shot attempts allowed per 603rd of 32
47.6 shot attempts allowed per 604th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against5th of 32
a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot against13th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
0.38 defensive breakdowns per 609th of 32
0.00 defensive breakdowns per 601st of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
+0.03 goals saved above expected per 6030th of 32
−0.35 goals saved above expected per 6022nd of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
79.3 shots per 60, both teams combined25th of 32
79.3 shots per 60, both teams combined17th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
forecheck score 86 (100 is league average)28th of 3219.2 forecheck plays recorded per 6028th of 32
forecheck score 81 (100 is league average)26th of 3219.4 forecheck plays recorded per 6028th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
hit score 96 (100 is league average)20th of 3225.4 hits recorded per 6022nd of 32
hit score 91 (100 is league average)20th of 3226.3 hits recorded per 6020th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
42.1% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six16th of 32
41.5% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six20th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
9.0 expected goals per 60 on the power play2nd of 32
10.5 expected goals per 60 on the power play1st of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
6.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded1st of 32
4.0 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
0.9 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded15th of 32
0.8 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded17th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
0.30 more penalties drawn than taken per 601st of 32
1.18 more penalties drawn than taken per 603rd of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are shown as arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Key players
Who Vegas leans on, and what they do best.
21:16 a game
#93 · Right wing · 3 P in 5 GP (1 G, 2 A)
- Most ice time
- L2 · Karlsson, Howden
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Setting up goalstop 3%
- Takeawaystop 4%
- Staying out of the boxtop 9%
- Power-play chancesbottom 1%
- Fast burstsbottom 9%
20:59 a game
#9 · Center · 12 P in 5 GP (3 G, 9 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- L1 · Stone, Barbashev
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Creating chancesTop 10
- Shooting volumeTop 10
- Creating his own chancesTop 10
- Power-play chancesbottom 5%
- Top speedTop 5
- Hardest shotTop 10
- Fast burststop 9%
- Hittingbottom 21%
19:29 a game
#61 · Right wing · 5 P in 5 GP (3 G, 2 A)
- L1 · Barbashev, Eichel
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Preventing chancestop 7%
- Power-play chancestop 9%
- Hardest shotTop 5
- Fast burstsbottom 8%
- Shot blockingtop 15%
- Staying out of the boxbottom 22%
18:44 a game
#71 · Center · 1 P in 5 GP (0 G, 1 A)
- L2 · Marner, Howden
- PP2
- Kills penalties
No clear strengths or weak spots yet.
- Faceoffstop 16%
- Hardest shottop 14%
- Hittingbottom 7%
21:37 a game
#27 · Defenseman · 3 P in 5 GP (1 G, 2 A)
- Most ice time
- P1 · McNabb
- PP1
- Kills penalties
- Tough minutes
- Creating chancestop 9%
- Staying out of the boxtop 10%
- Preventing chancestop 14%
- Hittingbottom 1%
- Creating chancestop 23%
- Distance skatedtop 13%
- Hittingbottom 14%
20:11 a game
#15 · Defenseman · 1 P in 5 GP (1 G, 0 A)
- 2nd in ice time
- P2 · Lauzon
- Kills penalties
- Staying out of the boxTop 10
- Preventing chancesTop 10
- Creating chancestop 14%
- Drawing penaltiesbottom 1%
- Preventing chancestop 25%
- Hittingbottom 14%
The 4 forwards and 2 defensemen with the most ice time a game (at least half the games played). Tags show how each is used; rows show his clearest strengths, and a weak spot in grey, as a percentile against his position. Point at anything for details. All Golden Knights players.
Lines
Who plays together at 5-on-5, and how each group is doing.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over the team’s last 10 games (5 so far this season), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Worth knowing
- R. Andersson is no longer killing penalties: 1% of the team’s shorthanded time in 5 games, down from 48% last season.
- L110:13 a game
- Creates
- 3.20
- Allows
- 1.91
- Share
- 62.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 52%
- L29:59 a game
- Creates
- 2.94
- Allows
- 2.12
- Share
- 58.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 64%
- L36:25 a game
- Creates
- 2.42
- Allows
- 2.52
- Share
- 48.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 39%
- L4New7:06 last game
- Creates
- 2.37
- Allows
- 2.77
- Share
- 46.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 75%
- P114:16 a game
- Creates
- 3.02
- Allows
- 2.11
- Share
- 58.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 57%
- P214:01 a game
- Creates
- 2.71
- Allows
- 2.20
- Share
- 55.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 60%
- P313:42 a game
- Creates
- 2.82
- Allows
- 2.75
- Share
- 50.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 55%
Last game
Against Toronto Maple Leafs, the team used the same lines and pairs as above.
Who plays against whom
Which opposing lines each Vegas group has actually been out against at 5-on-5.
Standing out in all games
- Dowd, Gatcomb, Bowman (L3) have spent 48% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 30%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Stone · Barbashev · EichelOpp. L131%Opp. L229%Opp. L314%Opp. L425%
- L2Karlsson · Marner · HowdenOpp. L124%Opp. L230%Opp. L326%Opp. L420%
- L3Dowd · Gatcomb · BowmanOpp. L148%Opp. L221%Opp. L39%Opp. L422%
- L4Hertl · Lavoie · ConnellyOpp. L118%Opp. L236%Opp. L328%Opp. L418%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1McNabb · TheodoreOpp. L131%Opp. L223%Opp. L326%Opp. L420%
- P2Hanifin · LauzonOpp. L132%Opp. L230%Opp. L314%Opp. L425%
- P3Andersson · WotherspoonOpp. L130%Opp. L234%Opp. L319%Opp. L416%
Standing out at home
- Dowd, Gatcomb, Bowman (L3) have spent 69% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 39%.
- Stone, Barbashev, Eichel (L1) have spent 27% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 15%.
- Hertl, Lavoie, Connelly (L4) have spent 38% of their time against opponents’ second lines. With no line matching it would be about 28%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Stone · Barbashev · EichelOpp. L121%Opp. L232%Opp. L320%Opp. L427%
- L2Karlsson · Marner · HowdenOpp. L140%Opp. L230%Opp. L318%Opp. L413%
- L3Dowd · Gatcomb · BowmanOpp. L169%Opp. L212%Opp. L311%Opp. L48%
- L4Hertl · Lavoie · ConnellyOpp. L129%Opp. L238%Opp. L327%Opp. L46%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1McNabb · TheodoreOpp. L139%Opp. L221%Opp. L324%Opp. L416%
- P2Hanifin · LauzonOpp. L143%Opp. L231%Opp. L312%Opp. L415%
- P3Andersson · WotherspoonOpp. L138%Opp. L230%Opp. L320%Opp. L412%
Standing out on the road
- Stone, Barbashev, Eichel (L1) have spent 50% of their time against opponents’ first lines. With no line matching it would be about 17%.
- Karlsson, Marner, Howden (L2) have spent 38% of their time against opponents’ third lines. With no line matching it would be about 20%.
- Hanifin, Lauzon (P2) have spent 40% of their time against opponents’ fourth lines. With no line matching it would be about 30%.
Forward lines against opposing forward lines
- L1Stone · Barbashev · EichelOpp. L150%Opp. L224%Opp. L34%Opp. L422%
- L2Karlsson · Marner · HowdenOpp. L12%Opp. L231%Opp. L338%Opp. L429%
- L3Dowd · Gatcomb · BowmanOpp. L113%Opp. L235%Opp. L35%Opp. L447%
- L4Hertl · Lavoie · ConnellyOpp. L14%Opp. L233%Opp. L328%Opp. L434%
Defense pairs against opposing forward lines
- P1McNabb · TheodoreOpp. L121%Opp. L226%Opp. L327%Opp. L426%
- P2Hanifin · LauzonOpp. L115%Opp. L228%Opp. L318%Opp. L440%
- P3Andersson · WotherspoonOpp. L117%Opp. L240%Opp. L319%Opp. L423%
Each strip adds to 100%: it shows how one Vegas group’s 5-on-5 time is split across the opponent’s four forward lines, numbered the same way as above. Sized by ice time, a wider box means more time against that line; even columns line the boxes up so you can compare groups straight down. At home the coach changes last and picks these matchups; on the road the other coach does. Faded rows have under ten minutes.
What “with no line matching” means: if a coach just rolled his lines and took whoever was out there, each of his groups would face the opponent’s first line about as often as that line is on the ice. If opposing first lines play a third of the time against Vegas, every Vegas group would see them for about a third of its shifts. A number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against them on purpose; well below means he is keeping it away.
Special teams
Who Vegas sends out with a man up and a man down.
Each power-play unit is built around its quarterback, the defenseman running it, plus the four players most often out with him over the last 10 games (5 so far). Power-play units’ expected goals per 60 are pulled toward league average while samples are small. Penalty kills are too loose for fixed units (the most common foursome covers only about a tenth of a typical team’s shorthanded time), so penalty killers are grouped by when they go on: the ones who start kills, the second wave who come on after the first change, and spot duty. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Power play
PP172% of the time
Creates 9.3 expected goals per 60
- S. TheodoreQuarterback
- J. Eichel
- T. HertlTrigger
- M. Marner
- M. StoneDistributor
PP228% of the time
Creates 7.5 expected goals per 60
- R. AnderssonQuarterback
- T. Connelly
- B. BowmanTrigger
- W. Karlsson
- V. Olofsson
Penalty kill
Kills allow 6.5 expected goals per 60, 1st of 32 (this season and last).
Kills allow 4.0 expected goals per 60, 2nd of 32 this season.
Starts the kill
- N. Dowd11 of 12 kills · 0:48 a kill · takes the draw
- W. Karlsson11 of 12 kills · 0:44 a kill
- B. McNabbD12 of 12 kills · 1:02 a kill
- P. WotherspoonD8 of 12 kills · 1:04 a kill
- S. TheodoreD9 of 12 kills · 0:30 a kill
Second wave
Spot duty
- B. Bowman2 of 12 kills · 0:30 a kill
- What the tags mean
- Quarterbackthe defenseman who runs the unit from the blue line.
- Triggerthe unit’s main shooter, with the most dangerous power-play shots on the team over this season and last.
- Distributorthe main passer, with the most first assists on the team’s power-play goals over this season and last.
- Net-frontparks in front of the net. At least 40% of his power-play shots come from within 15 feet.
- Pointa second defenseman on the unit, alongside the quarterback.
Goalies
Is he stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
C. Hart19 starts · 495 shots faced, this season and last
−2.6 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .961 256 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .870 185 shots
- High-danger save %
- .630 54 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 24.8
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.2
- Quality starts
- 63%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for C. HartHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−2.6 goals saved above expected in 19 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
24.8 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.9% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.2 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 73 seconds between shots; 26% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 63% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 16%
- Overall save %
- .891
C. Hart3 starts · 73 shots faced, this season
−0.9 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 39 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .741 27 shots
- High-danger save %
- .857 7 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 24.7
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 67%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for C. HartHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−0.9 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
24.7 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.7% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 75 seconds between shots; 29% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 67% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 33%
- Overall save %
- .890
A. Hill26 starts · 631 shots faced, this season and last
−14.7 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .976 328 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .819 215 shots
- High-danger save %
- .614 88 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 23.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.26
- Quality starts
- 35%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for A. HillHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−14.7 goals saved above expected in 26 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
23.3 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.7% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0.26 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 92 seconds between shots; 24% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 35% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 27%
- Overall save %
- .872
A. Hill2 starts · 44 shots faced, this season
−0.9 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .929 28 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .900 10 shots
- High-danger save %
- .667 6 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 21.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 50%
Night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Helping, or hung out to dry?
Show the full picture for A. HillHide the full picture
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
−0.9 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
21.2 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
the average shot he faces has a 6.5% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
a typical wait of 116 seconds between shots; 27% come after three quiet minutes
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
a quality start 50% of the time
- Really bad starts
- 0%
- Overall save %
- .886
Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up a lot of cross-ice passes will look worse here than he really is. Ratings compare him with goalies who have at least 10 starts over two seasons, or 2 this season.
Where the goals come from
How Vegas’s goals are scored and allowed, against the league average, and how much of any difference luck alone could explain.
More than luck would explain: more of Vegas’s goals come from rebounds.
- Everyday even-strength play52.1%187 of 359
- Power play21.4%77 of 359
- Rebound9.7%35 of 359
- Empty net4.7%17 of 359
- Off a turnover4.2%15 of 359
- Goalie pulled3.6%13 of 359
- Shorthanded3.1%11 of 359
- Off a faceoff win1.1%4 of 359
359 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of Vegas’s goals is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play47.4%9 of 19
- Power play26.3%5 of 19
- Rebound10.5%2 of 19
- Empty net5.3%1 of 19
- Off a turnover5.3%1 of 19
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 19
- Shorthanded5.3%1 of 19
- Off a faceoff win0%0 of 19
19 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
More than luck would explain: more of the goals Vegas allows come from everyday even-strength play; fewer from the power play.
- Everyday even-strength play59.3%188 of 317
- Power play15.8%50 of 317
- Rebound7.6%24 of 317
- Empty net4.4%14 of 317
- Off a turnover6.6%21 of 317
- Goalie pulled2.8%9 of 317
- Shorthanded1.9%6 of 317
- Off a faceoff win1.6%5 of 317
317 goals this season and last. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every row of the goals Vegas allows is within luck’s reach of the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play69.2%9 of 13
- Power play15.4%2 of 13
- Rebound7.7%1 of 13
- Empty net0%0 of 13
- Off a turnover0%0 of 13
- Goalie pulled0%0 of 13
- Shorthanded0%0 of 13
- Off a faceoff win7.7%1 of 13
13 goals this season, too few to say much: most of any gap from the league is luck. Each row has its own scale, so a small source is not squeezed against the left edge.
Every goal counts once, in the first of these that applies: empty net, power play, shorthanded, goalie pulled, then rebound, turnover, faceoff win, and everyday play. These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last.