Thursday, October 8
8:00 PM ET · Enterprise Center
The short version
Before the game
Round two in St. Louis
The Sharks already came to St. Louis once this season and left with a 3-2 overtime win. The Blues haven’t won in three. The Sharks are 3-1-0. St. Louis has had more of the chances over recent games and has home ice. San Jose can make it interesting if their penalty kill holds up.
The Sharks already came to St. Louis once this season and left with a 3-2 overtime win. The Blues haven’t won in three. The Sharks are 3-1-0. St. Louis has had more of the chances over recent games and has home ice. San Jose can pull it off if their penalty kill holds up.
Don’t read much into Hofer’s record against the Sharks. The Blues make their shots count, and the Sharks allow dangerous ones.
Who to watch
- Haunts themMacklin Celebrini has six goals in six games against St. Louis since 2023-24.
- Slow startRobert Thomas is still looking for his first goal of the season.
Hofer’s rough record against the Sharks is a coincidence
Since 2023-24, Hofer has been shaky against the Sharks, well below his usual. Fans love a pattern like this, but we checked three seasons of them and they predicted nothing. Expect the usual Hofer.
The call If Hofer starts, his save percentage lands closer to his usual .914 than to his .877 against the Sharks.
6 starts against San Jose: .877 save percentage · .914 against everyone else
Goalie starts since 2023-24 · 6 against San Jose, 2,689 shots against everyone else
The Blues should get some good looks
The Blues make their shots count, and the Sharks are near the bottom of the league at preventing dangerous shots. Expect the Blues to get some real chances.
The call The Blues’ average shot has at least their usual 6.7% chance of going in.
St. Louis 6th for shot quality (a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot) · San Jose 23rd for preventing dangerous shots
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 3 and 3 games this season
Don’t blink and you still might miss the shots
San Jose plays some of the league’s slowest games, and so does St. Louis. We think this one is even quieter than either team’s usual.
The call The game runs at fewer than 78.4 shots per 60 at 5-on-5, slower than either team’s usual.
Pace (shots per 60 at 5-on-5, both teams): San Jose 29th (78.4), St. Louis 28th (78.5)
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 3 and 3 games this season
These calls are written by fixed rules from the numbers below, and saved as they stand at puck drop. After the game, each one will be checked against what happened.
Style fingerprints
How San Jose and St. Louis play, trait by trait, on the same scales.
Each scale runs from the league’s lowest team on the left to its highest on the right. Numbers blend last season with the 3 and 3 games played so far; traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
This season only: 3 games for San Jose, 3 for St. Louis. Expect these to swing a lot, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
The biggest differences
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
San Jose: 10.4% of chances come from rebounds11th of 32
San Jose: 3.7% of chances come from rebounds28th of 32
St. Louis: 10.0% of chances come from rebounds29th of 32
St. Louis: 17.7% of chances come from rebounds5th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
San Jose: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot against23rd of 32
San Jose: a 7.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against29th of 32
St. Louis: a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against5th of 32
St. Louis: a 5.5% chance of scoring on the average shot against6th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
San Jose: a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot21st of 32
San Jose: a 4.6% chance of scoring on the average shot32nd of 32
St. Louis: a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot6th of 32
St. Louis: a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot12th of 32
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
San Jose: 59.9 shot attempts allowed per 6026th of 32
San Jose: 64.3 shot attempts allowed per 6028th of 32
St. Louis: 55.4 shot attempts allowed per 6012th of 32
St. Louis: 53.7 shot attempts allowed per 6014th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
San Jose: −0.01 goals saved above expected per 6031st of 32
San Jose: +0.07 goals saved above expected per 6018th of 32
St. Louis: +0.09 goals saved above expected per 6019th of 32
St. Louis: +0.07 goals saved above expected per 6017th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
San Jose: 30.3% of shots come from within 20 feet19th of 32
San Jose: 21.1% of shots come from within 20 feet32nd of 32
St. Louis: 28.8% of shots come from within 20 feet30th of 32
St. Louis: 25.8% of shots come from within 20 feet28th of 32
Show all 18 traitsHide the full set
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
San Jose: 47.3 shot attempts per 6030th of 32
San Jose: 41.8 shot attempts per 6030th of 32
St. Louis: 54.5 shot attempts per 6022nd of 32
St. Louis: 57.5 shot attempts per 6013th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
San Jose: a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot21st of 32
San Jose: a 4.6% chance of scoring on the average shot32nd of 32
St. Louis: a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot6th of 32
St. Louis: a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot12th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
San Jose: 10.4% of chances come from rebounds11th of 32
San Jose: 3.7% of chances come from rebounds28th of 32
St. Louis: 10.0% of chances come from rebounds29th of 32
St. Louis: 17.7% of chances come from rebounds5th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
San Jose: 6.9% of chances come right after a turnover27th of 32
San Jose: 9.0% of chances come right after a turnover13th of 32
St. Louis: 7.2% of chances come right after a turnover19th of 32
St. Louis: 1.7% of chances come right after a turnover28th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
San Jose: 35.2% of shot attempts come from defensemen13th of 32
San Jose: 39.8% of shot attempts come from defensemen5th of 32
St. Louis: 37.5% of shot attempts come from defensemen3rd of 32
St. Louis: 40.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen2nd of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
San Jose: 30.3% of shots come from within 20 feet19th of 32
San Jose: 21.1% of shots come from within 20 feet32nd of 32
St. Louis: 28.8% of shots come from within 20 feet30th of 32
St. Louis: 25.8% of shots come from within 20 feet28th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
San Jose: 59.9 shot attempts allowed per 6026th of 32
San Jose: 64.3 shot attempts allowed per 6028th of 32
St. Louis: 55.4 shot attempts allowed per 6012th of 32
St. Louis: 53.7 shot attempts allowed per 6014th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
San Jose: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot against23rd of 32
San Jose: a 7.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against29th of 32
St. Louis: a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against5th of 32
St. Louis: a 5.5% chance of scoring on the average shot against6th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
San Jose: 0.43 defensive breakdowns per 6023rd of 32
San Jose: 0.82 defensive breakdowns per 6025th of 32
St. Louis: 0.39 defensive breakdowns per 6013th of 32
St. Louis: 0.86 defensive breakdowns per 6026th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
San Jose: −0.01 goals saved above expected per 6031st of 32
San Jose: +0.07 goals saved above expected per 6018th of 32
St. Louis: +0.09 goals saved above expected per 6019th of 32
St. Louis: +0.07 goals saved above expected per 6017th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
San Jose: 78.4 shots per 60, both teams combined29th of 32
San Jose: 73.4 shots per 60, both teams combined27th of 32
St. Louis: 78.5 shots per 60, both teams combined28th of 32
St. Louis: 77.8 shots per 60, both teams combined19th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
San Jose: forecheck score 103 (100 is league average)14th of 32San Jose: 22.7 forecheck plays recorded per 6017th of 32
San Jose: forecheck score 105 (100 is league average)13th of 32San Jose: 25.4 forecheck plays recorded per 6015th of 32
St. Louis: forecheck score 104 (100 is league average)13th of 32St. Louis: 23.8 forecheck plays recorded per 609th of 32
St. Louis: forecheck score 105 (100 is league average)14th of 32St. Louis: 25.8 forecheck plays recorded per 6014th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
San Jose: hit score 109 (100 is league average)10th of 32San Jose: 26.8 hits recorded per 6016th of 32
San Jose: hit score 103 (100 is league average)15th of 32San Jose: 28.3 hits recorded per 6019th of 32
St. Louis: hit score 105 (100 is league average)12th of 32St. Louis: 27.7 hits recorded per 6012th of 32
St. Louis: hit score 107 (100 is league average)14th of 32St. Louis: 30.7 hits recorded per 6014th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
San Jose: 41.6% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six17th of 32
San Jose: 43.2% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six15th of 32
St. Louis: 42.9% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six12th of 32
St. Louis: 42.6% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six16th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
San Jose: 7.3 expected goals per 60 on the power play22nd of 32
San Jose: 9.2 expected goals per 60 on the power play6th of 32
St. Louis: 6.1 expected goals per 60 on the power play32nd of 32
St. Louis: 4.2 expected goals per 60 on the power play30th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
San Jose: 8.0 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded23rd of 32
San Jose: 11.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded31st of 32
St. Louis: 7.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded17th of 32
St. Louis: 7.0 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded15th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
San Jose: 0.8 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded18th of 32
San Jose: 1.2 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded9th of 32
St. Louis: 0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded29th of 32
St. Louis: 0.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
San Jose: 0.01 more penalties taken than drawn per 6019th of 32
San Jose: 0.96 more penalties taken than drawn per 6026th of 32
St. Louis: 0.05 more penalties taken than drawn per 6020th of 32
St. Louis: 1.00 more penalties taken than drawn per 6028th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Lines and deployment
St. Louis is at home, so their coach changes last and chooses who plays against whom.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over each team’s last 10 games (3 and 3 so far), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
San Jose Sharks
- L18:58 a gamein 2 of last 3
T. ToffoliI. ChernyshovM. Misa
- Creates
- 2.71
- Allows
- 2.76
- Share
- 49.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 56%
- L212:03 a gamein 2 of last 3
M. MarchmentW. SmithM. Celebrini
- Creates
- 2.51
- Allows
- 2.53
- Share
- 49.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 48%
- L37:16 a gamein 2 of last 3
B. GoodrowK. SherwoodZ. Ostapchuk
- Creates
- 2.39
- Allows
- 2.09
- Share
- 53.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 12%
- L410:30 a gamein 2 of last 3
- Creates
- 1.68
- Allows
- 2.30
- Share
- 42.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 67%
- P114:31 a game
- Creates
- 2.15
- Allows
- 2.59
- Share
- 45.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 58%
- P213:21 a game
- Creates
- 2.34
- Allows
- 2.69
- Share
- 46.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- P3New12:14 last game
- Creates
- 2.54
- Allows
- 2.74
- Share
- 48.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 60%
St. Louis Blues
- L18:52 a game
R. ThomasD. HollowayJ. Snuggerud
- Creates
- 2.97
- Allows
- 2.18
- Share
- 57.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 44%
- L2New10:48 last game
J. BerggrenC. McMichaelM. McTavish
- Creates
- 2.57
- Allows
- 2.45
- Share
- 51.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 67%
- L3New6:13 last game
- Creates
- 2.55
- Allows
- 1.89
- Share
- 57.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- L4New6:12 last game
P. BuchnevichJ. NeighboursD. Dvorsky
- Creates
- 1.87
- Allows
- 2.26
- Share
- 45.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 40%
- P112:48 a gamein 2 of last 3
- Creates
- 2.58
- Allows
- 1.96
- Share
- 56.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 43%
- P210:58 a gamein 2 of last 3
- Creates
- 2.87
- Allows
- 2.45
- Share
- 53.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 58%
- P310:40 a gamein 2 of last 3
- Creates
- 2.70
- Allows
- 2.56
- Share
- 51.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
Who St. Louis is likely to send against whom
St. Louis has not played at home yet this season, so there is no matching habit to show.
Special teams
Each power play set against the penalty killers it will face.
San Jose power play against St. Louis penalty kill
San Jose power play
7.3 expected goals per 60 · 22nd of 32
St. Louis penalty kill
7.5 expected goals allowed per 60 · 17th of 32
San Jose power play
PP179% of the time
Creates 8.2 expected goals per 60
- L. CagnoniQuarterback
- A. WennbergDistributor
- W. Smith
- I. ChernyshovNet-front
- M. CelebriniTrigger
PP221% of the time
Creates 7.0 expected goals per 60
- D. OrlovQuarterback
- T. ToffoliTrigger
- M. Marchment
- I. Stenberg
- M. MisaNet-front
St. Louis penalty kill
Starts the kill
- R. Thomas9 of 10 kills · 1:00 a kill · takes the draw
- P. Buchnevich8 of 10 kills · 0:59 a kill
- P. BrobergD10 of 10 kills · 1:08 a kill
- C. ParaykoD10 of 10 kills · 1:00 a kill
- C. FowlerD9 of 10 kills · 1:05 a kill
Second wave
- P. Suter10 of 10 kills · 0:59 a kill
- C. McMichael9 of 10 kills · 0:39 a kill
- D. Dube5 of 10 kills · 0:42 a kill
- J. Neighbours5 of 10 kills · 0:35 a kill
- D. Holloway4 of 10 kills · 0:23 a kill
- B. CarloD9 of 10 kills · 1:02 a kill
Spot duty
- A. Toropchenko1 of 10 kills · 0:21 a kill
- J. Berggren1 of 10 kills · 0:21 a kill
- T. LindsteinD2 of 10 kills · 0:34 a kill
St. Louis power play against San Jose penalty kill
St. Louis power play
6.1 expected goals per 60 · 32nd of 32
San Jose penalty kill
8.0 expected goals allowed per 60 · 23rd of 32
St. Louis power play
PP155% of the time
Creates 6.2 expected goals per 60
- C. FowlerQuarterback
- D. Holloway
- J. SnuggerudTrigger
- R. ThomasDistributor
- M. McTavish
PP245% of the time
Creates 6.8 expected goals per 60
- A. JiricekQuarterback
- J. NeighboursDistributor
- C. McMichael
- P. BuchnevichTrigger
- D. Dvorsky
San Jose penalty kill
Starts the kill
- B. Goodrow11 of 11 kills · 1:02 a kill
- C. Graf8 of 11 kills · 0:48 a kill · takes the draw
- J. TroubaD11 of 11 kills · 1:01 a kill
- D. NurseD8 of 11 kills · 0:59 a kill
- N. AllanD7 of 11 kills · 1:05 a kill
Second wave
- Z. Ostapchuk8 of 11 kills · 0:50 a kill
- K. Sherwood7 of 11 kills · 0:46 a kill
- A. Wennberg6 of 11 kills · 0:48 a kill
- M. KesselringD9 of 11 kills · 0:59 a kill
Spot duty
- M. Celebrini4 of 11 kills · 0:32 a kill
- T. Dellandrea3 of 11 kills · 0:33 a kill · takes the draw
- D. OrlovD4 of 11 kills · 0:38 a kill
- S. DickinsonD2 of 11 kills · 0:56 a kill
Units and penalty-kill roles use each team’s last 10 games; power-play role tags use this season and last, counting only games with the player’s current team; the map shows the last 140 power-play shots. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Goaltending
Is each goalie stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
Y. Askarov45 starts · 1429 shots, this season and last
−16.3 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .963 722 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .855 511 shots
- High-danger save %
- .653 196 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 30.8
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.34
- Quality starts
- 42%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
J. Hofer46 starts · 1295 shots, this season and last
+20.8 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .980 711 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .873 426 shots
- High-danger save %
- .696 158 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.35
- Quality starts
- 63%
J. Binnington39 starts · 1046 shots, this season and last
−28.8 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .956 548 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .811 354 shots
- High-danger save %
- .701 144 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 26.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.3
- Quality starts
- 44%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- Y. Askarov: −16.3 goals saved above expected in 45 starts
- J. Hofer: +20.8 goals saved above expected in 46 starts
- J. Binnington: −28.8 goals saved above expected in 39 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- Y. Askarov: 30.8 shots faced per 60
- J. Hofer: 28.3 shots faced per 60
- J. Binnington: 26.5 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- Y. Askarov: the average shot he faces has a 7.1% chance of going in
- J. Hofer: the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- J. Binnington: the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- Y. Askarov: 0.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- J. Hofer: 0.35 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- J. Binnington: 0.3 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- Y. Askarov: a typical wait of 65 seconds between shots
- J. Hofer: a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots
- J. Binnington: a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- Y. Askarov: a quality start 42% of the time
- J. Hofer: a quality start 63% of the time
- J. Binnington: a quality start 44% of the time
Y. Askarov, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Hofer, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Binnington, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
Y. Askarov3 starts · 87 shots, this season
+0.2 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- .955 44 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .828 29 shots
- High-danger save %
- .643 14 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.64
- Quality starts
- 0%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
J. Hofer2 starts · 44 shots, this season
+2.6 goals saved above expected
- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 28 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .929 14 shots
- High-danger save %
- .500 2 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 22.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
J. Binnington1 start · 36 shots, this season
−2.4 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate
- Low-danger save %
- .938 16 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .867 15 shots
- High-danger save %
- .400 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 36
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 2
- Quality starts
- 0%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- Y. Askarov: +0.2 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- J. Hofer: +2.6 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- J. Binnington: −2.4 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- Y. Askarov: 28 shots faced per 60
- J. Hofer: 22.3 shots faced per 60
- J. Binnington: 36 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- Y. Askarov: the average shot he faces has a 8.1% chance of going in
- J. Hofer: the average shot he faces has a 6.3% chance of going in
- J. Binnington: the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- Y. Askarov: 0.64 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- J. Hofer: 0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- J. Binnington: 2 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- Y. Askarov: a typical wait of 82 seconds between shots
- J. Hofer: a typical wait of 80 seconds between shots
- J. Binnington: a typical wait of 78 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- Y. Askarov: a quality start 0% of the time
- J. Hofer: a quality start 100% of the time
- J. Binnington: a quality start 0% of the time (too few starts to place)
Y. Askarov, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Hofer, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Binnington, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
The menus list every goalie on each team, busiest this season first; the site does not yet know who will start. Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up many cross-ice passes looks worse here than he really is.
Where the goals come from
How each team’s goals are scored, or allowed, against the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play53.9%60.3%
- Power play21.7%15.6%
- Rebound8.9%4.6%
- Empty net4.7%6.3%
- Off a turnover5.4%6.3%
- Goalie pulled2.3%3%
- Shorthanded1.6%2.1%
- Off a faceoff win1.6%1.7%
258 San Jose goals and 237 St. Louis goals scored this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play44.4%28.6%
- Power play22.2%0%
- Rebound0%14.3%
- Empty net0%28.6%
- Off a turnover22.2%14.3%
- Goalie pulled0%14.3%
- Shorthanded11.1%0%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
9 San Jose goals and 7 St. Louis goals scored this season. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play54%56.1%
- Power play20.2%20.1%
- Rebound7%7.2%
- Empty net6%5.3%
- Off a turnover6%6.1%
- Goalie pulled3%1.9%
- Shorthanded2.3%1.5%
- Off a faceoff win1.7%1.9%
302 San Jose goals and 264 St. Louis goals allowed this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play58.3%50%
- Power play25%10%
- Rebound0%0%
- Empty net0%20%
- Off a turnover16.7%20%
- Goalie pulled0%0%
- Shorthanded0%0%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
12 San Jose goals and 10 St. Louis goals allowed this season. Each row has its own scale.
These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last. Each team page shows how much luck alone can move each row.
Data notes
- Sources. Game data from the NHL; expected goals from this site’s own model, cross-checked against MoneyPuck.com.
- Early season. San Jose has played 3 games and St. Louis 3, so most numbers blend this season with last. The season switch at the top shows this season alone.
- Percentiles and ranks compare a team or player with the rest of the league: 90 means better than 90% of the league at that thing.
- Blind spots. Public game data doesn’t record passes before a shot, where defenders are standing, or rushes up the ice, so the site shows none of those.
- Hits, giveaways and takeaways depend on each arena’s scorer; anything built on them is arena-adjusted. How it works.
- Key players for each side are on the team pages.
Team pages: San Jose Sharks · St. Louis Blues