Tuesday, October 6
7:30 PM ET · Madison Square Garden
The short version
Before the game
Watch the Islanders’ puck management
The Rangers have won three straight. The Islanders are 1-1-0. The Islanders have had more of the chances over recent games and the Rangers have home ice. The Islanders’ way back in is keeping shots to a minimum.
The Rangers have won three straight. The Islanders are 1-1-0. The Islanders have had more of the chances over recent games and the Rangers have home ice. The Islanders can pull it off if they keep shots to a minimum.
The Rangers pounce on loose pucks, and the Islanders cough them up. Expect plenty of hitting.
Who to watch
- Leads the wayLogan Stanley leads the Islanders with two points.
- Leads the wayAdam Fox leads the Rangers with four points.
Watch the Islanders’ puck management
The Rangers turn stolen pucks into chances, and the Islanders are one of the league’s worst at avoiding breakdowns. A sloppy pass or two could cost the Islanders.
The call The Rangers get at least their usual 7.5% of their 5-on-5 chances right after winning the puck.
NY Rangers 10th for chances off turnovers (7.5% of their chances come right after winning the puck) · NY Islanders 31st for avoiding breakdowns
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 4 and 2 games this season
The Rangers’ power play has a target
The Islanders’ penalty kill is one of the league’s worst, and the Rangers’ power play is near the top of the league. Discipline matters more than usual for the Islanders tonight.
The call The Rangers’ power play creates at least their usual 7.7 expected goals per 60.
NY Rangers 10th for power play (7.7 expected goals per 60) · NY Islanders 30th for penalty kill
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 4 and 2 games this season
Bodies will fly
The Islanders and the Rangers are both among the league’s heaviest hitters, even after adjusting for each arena’s scorer. Keep your head up.
The call The two teams’ combined hit score reaches their usual 112.
Hit score (100 is league average): NY Islanders 107 (9th), NY Rangers 118 (2nd)
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 2 and 4 games this season
These calls are written by fixed rules from the numbers below, and saved as they stand at puck drop. After the game, each one will be checked against what happened.
Style fingerprints
How NY Islanders and NY Rangers play, trait by trait, on the same scales.
Each scale runs from the league’s lowest team on the left to its highest on the right. Numbers blend last season with the 2 and 4 games played so far; traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
This season only: 2 games for NY Islanders, 4 for NY Rangers. Expect these to swing a lot, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
The biggest differences
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
NY Islanders: 1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
NY Islanders: 3.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
NY Rangers: 0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded27th of 32
NY Rangers: 0.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded24th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
NY Islanders: 0.10 more penalties drawn than taken per 608th of 32
NY Islanders: 1.00 more penalties taken than drawn per 6027th of 32
NY Rangers: 0.21 more penalties taken than drawn per 6031st of 32
NY Rangers: 0.50 more penalties taken than drawn per 6019th of 32
- PaceSlogTrack meet
NY Islanders: 84.0 shots per 60, both teams combined8th of 32
NY Islanders: 92.9 shots per 60, both teams combined3rd of 32
NY Rangers: 78.2 shots per 60, both teams combined30th of 32
NY Rangers: 71.3 shots per 60, both teams combined30th of 32
- Power playHarmlessLethal
NY Islanders: 6.7 expected goals per 60 on the power play29th of 32
NY Islanders: 5.5 expected goals per 60 on the power play20th of 32
NY Rangers: 7.7 expected goals per 60 on the power play10th of 32
NY Rangers: 6.1 expected goals per 60 on the power play18th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
NY Islanders: 43.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six3rd of 32
NY Islanders: 45.7% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six2nd of 32
NY Rangers: 41.3% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six20th of 32
NY Rangers: 41.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six20th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
NY Islanders: 10.5% of chances come from rebounds6th of 32
NY Islanders: 7.2% of chances come from rebounds21st of 32
NY Rangers: 10.1% of chances come from rebounds22nd of 32
NY Rangers: 8.9% of chances come from rebounds18th of 32
Show all 18 traitsHide the full set
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
NY Islanders: 56.1 shot attempts per 6018th of 32
NY Islanders: 56.6 shot attempts per 6016th of 32
NY Rangers: 51.9 shot attempts per 6028th of 32
NY Rangers: 49.7 shot attempts per 6026th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
NY Islanders: a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot19th of 32
NY Islanders: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot15th of 32
NY Rangers: a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot14th of 32
NY Rangers: a 7.5% chance of scoring on the average shot4th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
NY Islanders: 10.5% of chances come from rebounds6th of 32
NY Islanders: 7.2% of chances come from rebounds21st of 32
NY Rangers: 10.1% of chances come from rebounds22nd of 32
NY Rangers: 8.9% of chances come from rebounds18th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
NY Islanders: 6.9% of chances come right after a turnover24th of 32
NY Islanders: 21.6% of chances come right after a turnover1st of 32
NY Rangers: 7.5% of chances come right after a turnover10th of 32
NY Rangers: 7.1% of chances come right after a turnover17th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
NY Islanders: 36.8% of shot attempts come from defensemen3rd of 32
NY Islanders: 29.6% of shot attempts come from defensemen26th of 32
NY Rangers: 35.9% of shot attempts come from defensemen10th of 32
NY Rangers: 34.9% of shot attempts come from defensemen14th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
NY Islanders: 30.5% of shots come from within 20 feet18th of 32
NY Islanders: 38.1% of shots come from within 20 feet5th of 32
NY Rangers: 32.4% of shots come from within 20 feet3rd of 32
NY Rangers: 41.3% of shots come from within 20 feet2nd of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
NY Islanders: 59.4 shot attempts allowed per 6023rd of 32
NY Islanders: 62.5 shot attempts allowed per 6023rd of 32
NY Rangers: 57.4 shot attempts allowed per 6018th of 32
NY Rangers: 56.8 shot attempts allowed per 6019th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
NY Islanders: a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot against21st of 32
NY Islanders: a 5.8% chance of scoring on the average shot against8th of 32
NY Rangers: a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot against12th of 32
NY Rangers: a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot against23rd of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
NY Islanders: 0.48 defensive breakdowns per 6031st of 32
NY Islanders: 0.70 defensive breakdowns per 6024th of 32
NY Rangers: 0.41 defensive breakdowns per 6019th of 32
NY Rangers: 0.00 defensive breakdowns per 601st of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
NY Islanders: +0.23 goals saved above expected per 601st of 32
NY Islanders: +2.01 goals saved above expected per 601st of 32
NY Rangers: +0.20 goals saved above expected per 602nd of 32
NY Rangers: +1.29 goals saved above expected per 604th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
NY Islanders: 84.0 shots per 60, both teams combined8th of 32
NY Islanders: 92.9 shots per 60, both teams combined3rd of 32
NY Rangers: 78.2 shots per 60, both teams combined30th of 32
NY Rangers: 71.3 shots per 60, both teams combined30th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
NY Islanders: forecheck score 93 (100 is league average)21st of 32NY Islanders: 21.7 forecheck plays recorded per 6021st of 32
NY Islanders: forecheck score 88 (100 is league average)20th of 32NY Islanders: 23.9 forecheck plays recorded per 6018th of 32
NY Rangers: forecheck score 113 (100 is league average)5th of 32NY Rangers: 25.5 forecheck plays recorded per 604th of 32
NY Rangers: forecheck score 103 (100 is league average)16th of 32NY Rangers: 25.9 forecheck plays recorded per 6013th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
NY Islanders: hit score 107 (100 is league average)9th of 32NY Islanders: 28.6 hits recorded per 609th of 32
NY Islanders: hit score 129 (100 is league average)3rd of 32NY Islanders: 41.3 hits recorded per 602nd of 32
NY Rangers: hit score 118 (100 is league average)2nd of 32NY Rangers: 31.0 hits recorded per 603rd of 32
NY Rangers: hit score 107 (100 is league average)13th of 32NY Rangers: 32.0 hits recorded per 6012th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
NY Islanders: 43.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six3rd of 32
NY Islanders: 45.7% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six2nd of 32
NY Rangers: 41.3% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six20th of 32
NY Rangers: 41.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six20th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
NY Islanders: 6.7 expected goals per 60 on the power play29th of 32
NY Islanders: 5.5 expected goals per 60 on the power play20th of 32
NY Rangers: 7.7 expected goals per 60 on the power play10th of 32
NY Rangers: 6.1 expected goals per 60 on the power play18th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
NY Islanders: 8.3 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded30th of 32
NY Islanders: 5.8 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded13th of 32
NY Rangers: 7.7 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded20th of 32
NY Rangers: 4.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded5th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
NY Islanders: 1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
NY Islanders: 3.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
NY Rangers: 0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded27th of 32
NY Rangers: 0.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded24th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
NY Islanders: 0.10 more penalties drawn than taken per 608th of 32
NY Islanders: 1.00 more penalties taken than drawn per 6027th of 32
NY Rangers: 0.21 more penalties taken than drawn per 6031st of 32
NY Rangers: 0.50 more penalties taken than drawn per 6019th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Lines and deployment
NY Rangers is at home, so their coach changes last and chooses who plays against whom.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over each team’s last 10 games (2 and 4 so far), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
New York Islanders
- L1New8:56 last game
K. PalmieriB. HorvatE. Heineman
- Creates
- 2.71
- Allows
- 2.61
- Share
- 50.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- L2New9:04 last game
J. PageauA. DuclairS. Holmstrom
- Creates
- 2.44
- Allows
- 2.50
- Share
- 49.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 14%
- L3New8:26 last game
- Creates
- 2.94
- Allows
- 2.52
- Share
- 53.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 43%
- L4New6:55 last game
- Creates
- 2.08
- Allows
- 2.46
- Share
- 45.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 100%
- P110:46 a game
- Creates
- 2.75
- Allows
- 2.26
- Share
- 54.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- P29:38 a game
- Creates
- 2.55
- Allows
- 2.64
- Share
- 49.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 40%
- P38:28 a game
- Creates
- 2.55
- Allows
- 2.86
- Share
- 47.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 58%
New York Rangers
- L111:30 a game
M. ZibanejadA. LafrenièreG. Perreault
- Creates
- 2.93
- Allows
- 2.22
- Share
- 56.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 61%
- L28:14 a game
- Creates
- 2.46
- Allows
- 2.78
- Share
- 46.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 38%
- L3New10:42 last game
J. MillerP. DorofeyevT. Kartye
- Creates
- 2.77
- Allows
- 2.20
- Share
- 55.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- L4New1:10 last game
O. BjorkstrandJ. VelenoJ. Chmelar
- Creates
- 1.98
- Allows
- 2.48
- Share
- 44.3%
- Off. zone draws
- –
- P113:42 a game
- Creates
- 2.29
- Allows
- 2.61
- Share
- 46.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 25%
- P211:50 a game
- Creates
- 2.80
- Allows
- 2.39
- Share
- 53.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 52%
- P311:02 a game
- Creates
- 2.67
- Allows
- 2.71
- Share
- 49.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 44%
Worth knowing
- NY Rangers S. Durzi has started killing penalties: on the ice for 51% of the team’s shorthanded time in 4 games, up from 7% last season.
Who NY Rangers is likely to send against whom
Each strip shows how one NY Rangers group’s 5-on-5 time at home has been split across opponents’ four forward lines. Tonight those lines are NY Islanders’s, named in each box.
NY Islanders’s lines tonightL1 Palmieri · Horvat · HeinemanL2 Pageau · Duclair · HolmstromL3 Schenn · Ritchie · EklundL4 Cizikas · Palat · Maccelli
NY Rangers forward lines against NY Islanders forward lines
- L1Zibanejad · Lafrenière · PerreaultNYI L137%NYI L220%NYI L326%NYI L417%
- L2Tolvanen · Cuylle · LabaNYI L117%NYI L250%NYI L321%NYI L412%
- L3Miller · Dorofeyev · KartyeNYI L137%NYI L227%NYI L327%NYI L49%
- L4Bjorkstrand · Veleno · ChmelarNYI L151%NYI L23%NYI L334%NYI L412%
NY Rangers defense pairs against NY Islanders forward lines
- P1Pettersson · DurziNYI L126%NYI L233%NYI L325%NYI L416%
- P2Gavrikov · FoxNYI L143%NYI L229%NYI L325%NYI L43%
- P3Schneider · SmitsNYI L131%NYI L218%NYI L328%NYI L423%
Based on 2 NY Rangers home games this season, so treat it as a habit forming, not a certainty. Faded rows have under ten minutes. With no line matching, each group would face an opposing line about as often as that line is on the ice; a number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against it on purpose.
Special teams
Each power play set against the penalty killers it will face.
NY Islanders power play against NY Rangers penalty kill
NY Islanders power play
6.7 expected goals per 60 · 29th of 32
NY Rangers penalty kill
7.7 expected goals allowed per 60 · 20th of 32
NY Islanders power play
PP174% of the time
Creates 6.6 expected goals per 60
- M. SchaeferQuarterback
- B. HorvatTrigger
- K. PalmieriNet-front
- M. Maccelli
- B. Schenn
PP226% of the time
Creates 6.6 expected goals per 60
- T. DeAngeloQuarterback
- S. Holmstrom
- C. RitchieTrigger
- V. Eklund
- A. DuclairNet-front
NY Rangers penalty kill
Starts the kill
- T. Kartye11 of 11 kills · 0:48 a kill
- W. Cuylle8 of 11 kills · 0:35 a kill
- S. DurziD9 of 11 kills · 1:02 a kill
- M. PetterssonD9 of 11 kills · 1:00 a kill
- V. GavrikovD10 of 11 kills · 0:54 a kill
- B. SchneiderD9 of 11 kills · 0:51 a kill
Second wave
- J. Veleno11 of 11 kills · 0:52 a kill · takes the draw
- M. Zibanejad10 of 11 kills · 0:31 a kill · takes the draw
- E. Tolvanen9 of 11 kills · 0:29 a kill
- N. Laba8 of 11 kills · 0:32 a kill · takes the draw
- A. FoxD5 of 11 kills · 0:35 a kill
NY Rangers power play against NY Islanders penalty kill
NY Rangers power play
7.7 expected goals per 60 · 10th of 32
NY Islanders penalty kill
8.3 expected goals allowed per 60 · 30th of 32
NY Rangers power play
PP169% of the time
Creates 6.8 expected goals per 60
- A. FoxQuarterback
- A. LafrenièreDistributor
- M. ZibanejadTrigger
- P. Dorofeyev
- J. MillerNet-front
PP230% of the time
Creates 6.5 expected goals per 60
- S. DurziQuarterback
- W. CuylleTrigger
- G. PerreaultDistributor
- E. Tolvanen
- O. Bjorkstrand
NY Islanders penalty kill
Starts the kill
- J. Pageau9 of 9 kills · 0:48 a kill · takes the draw
- S. Holmstrom9 of 9 kills · 0:43 a kill
- R. PulockD9 of 9 kills · 1:09 a kill
- A. PelechD9 of 9 kills · 1:04 a kill
Second wave
- E. Heineman9 of 9 kills · 0:47 a kill
- C. Cizikas8 of 9 kills · 0:48 a kill
- B. Horvat7 of 9 kills · 0:45 a kill
- O. Palat6 of 9 kills · 0:33 a kill
- A. RomanovD9 of 9 kills · 0:55 a kill
- L. StanleyD8 of 9 kills · 0:52 a kill
Spot duty
- M. SchaeferD1 of 9 kills · 0:45 a kill
Units and penalty-kill roles use each team’s last 10 games; power-play role tags use this season and last, counting only games with the player’s current team; the map shows the last 140 power-play shots. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Goaltending
Is each goalie stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
I. Sorokin57 starts · 1593 shots, this season and last
+31.2 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .974 781 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .877 554 shots
- High-danger save %
- .775 258 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.6
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.43
- Quality starts
- 54%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
I. Shesterkin53 starts · 1501 shots, this season and last
+26.8 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .976 763 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .889 530 shots
- High-danger save %
- .740 208 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.34
- Quality starts
- 66%
D. Garand4 starts · 118 shots, this season and last
+6.8 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .986 70 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .968 31 shots
- High-danger save %
- .824 17 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.9
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- I. Sorokin: +31.2 goals saved above expected in 57 starts
- I. Shesterkin: +26.8 goals saved above expected in 53 starts
- D. Garand: +6.8 goals saved above expected in 4 starts (too few starts to place)
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- I. Sorokin: 28.6 shots faced per 60
- I. Shesterkin: 28.1 shots faced per 60
- D. Garand: 28.9 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- I. Sorokin: the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in
- I. Shesterkin: the average shot he faces has a 7.0% chance of going in
- D. Garand: the average shot he faces has a 6.9% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- I. Sorokin: 0.43 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- I. Shesterkin: 0.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- D. Garand: 0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- I. Sorokin: a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots
- I. Shesterkin: a typical wait of 72 seconds between shots
- D. Garand: a typical wait of 59 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- I. Sorokin: a quality start 54% of the time
- I. Shesterkin: a quality start 66% of the time
- D. Garand: a quality start 100% of the time (too few starts to place)
I. Sorokin, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
I. Shesterkin, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
D. Garand, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
I. Sorokin2 starts · 63 shots, this season
+4.0 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 32 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .962 26 shots
- High-danger save %
- .800 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 32.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.51
- Quality starts
- 100%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
I. Shesterkin3 starts · 76 shots, this season
+3.6 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 31 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .917 36 shots
- High-danger save %
- .778 9 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
D. Garand1 start · 22 shots, this season
+1.6 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 14 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- 1.000 6 shots
- High-danger save %
- 1.000 2 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 22
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- I. Sorokin: +4.0 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- I. Shesterkin: +3.6 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- D. Garand: +1.6 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- I. Sorokin: 32.1 shots faced per 60
- I. Shesterkin: 25.4 shots faced per 60
- D. Garand: 22 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- I. Sorokin: the average shot he faces has a 6.4% chance of going in
- I. Shesterkin: the average shot he faces has a 7.1% chance of going in
- D. Garand: the average shot he faces has a 5.5% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- I. Sorokin: 0.51 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- I. Shesterkin: 0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- D. Garand: 0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- I. Sorokin: a typical wait of 71 seconds between shots
- I. Shesterkin: a typical wait of 82 seconds between shots
- D. Garand: a typical wait of 86 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- I. Sorokin: a quality start 100% of the time
- I. Shesterkin: a quality start 100% of the time
- D. Garand: a quality start 100% of the time (too few starts to place)
I. Sorokin, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
I. Shesterkin, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
D. Garand, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
The menus list every goalie on each team, busiest this season first; the site does not yet know who will start. Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up many cross-ice passes looks worse here than he really is.
Where the goals come from
How each team’s goals are scored, or allowed, against the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play55.7%55.9%
- Power play17%22.4%
- Rebound6.8%6.9%
- Empty net3%6.1%
- Off a turnover2.6%2.9%
- Goalie pulled6.4%2.4%
- Shorthanded4.7%2%
- Off a faceoff win3.8%1.2%
235 NY Islanders goals and 245 NY Rangers goals scored this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play42.9%45.5%
- Power play14.3%18.2%
- Rebound0%9.1%
- Empty net0%27.3%
- Off a turnover14.3%0%
- Goalie pulled0%0%
- Shorthanded28.6%0%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
7 NY Islanders goals and 11 NY Rangers goals scored this season. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play59.7%53.3%
- Power play17.2%20%
- Rebound4.6%8.2%
- Empty net5.9%10.2%
- Off a turnover4.2%2.7%
- Goalie pulled3.4%0.8%
- Shorthanded3.8%3.1%
- Off a faceoff win1.3%1.6%
238 NY Islanders goals and 255 NY Rangers goals allowed this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play50%50%
- Power play50%16.7%
- Rebound0%0%
- Empty net0%16.7%
- Off a turnover0%16.7%
- Goalie pulled0%0%
- Shorthanded0%0%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
2 NY Islanders goals and 6 NY Rangers goals allowed this season. Each row has its own scale.
These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last. Each team page shows how much luck alone can move each row.
Data notes
- Sources. Game data from the NHL; expected goals from this site’s own model, cross-checked against MoneyPuck.com.
- Early season. NY Islanders has played 2 games and NY Rangers 4, so most numbers blend this season with last. The season switch at the top shows this season alone.
- Percentiles and ranks compare a team or player with the rest of the league: 90 means better than 90% of the league at that thing.
- Blind spots. Public game data doesn’t record passes before a shot, where defenders are standing, or rushes up the ice, so the site shows none of those.
- Hits, giveaways and takeaways depend on each arena’s scorer; anything built on them is arena-adjusted. How it works.
- Key players for each side are on the team pages.
Team pages: New York Islanders · New York Rangers