Saturday, October 17
1:00 PM ET · Capital One Arena
The short version
Before the game
Bratt’s favourite opponent
The Capitals have won two in a row. The Devils are 2-2-0. New Jersey has controlled the play far better over recent games and Washington has home ice. Washington can pull it off if they get good looks.
The Capitals have won two in a row. The Devils are 2-2-0. New Jersey has controlled the play far better over recent games and Washington has home ice. Washington’s way back in is getting good looks.
The Devils pounce on loose pucks, and the Capitals cough them up. The Capitals and the Devils sit at opposite ends for shots from in close.
Who to watch
- Old teamDeclan Chisholm faces his old team, Washington.
- Owns themJesper Bratt has a point in eight straight games against Washington.
- Haunts themAlex Ovechkin has six goals in ten games against New Jersey since 2023-24.
- MissingMatt Roy has missed the Capitals’ last two games.
Watch the Capitals’ puck management
The Devils turn stolen pucks into chances, and the Capitals are the league’s worst at avoiding breakdowns. A sloppy pass or two could cost the Capitals.
The call The Devils get at least their usual 7.8% of their 5-on-5 chances right after winning the puck.
New Jersey 3rd for chances off turnovers (7.8% of their chances come right after winning the puck) · Washington 32nd for avoiding breakdowns
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 4 and 4 games this season
The Devils’ goalie is in for some dangerous shots
The Devils have struggled to prevent dangerous shots, and the Capitals don’t waste many.
The call The Capitals’ average shot has at least their usual 6.7% chance of going in.
Washington 6th for shot quality (a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot) · New Jersey 26th for preventing dangerous shots
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 4 and 4 games this season
The Capitals get in close; the Devils shoot from distance
On shots from in close, Washington is near the top of the league and New Jersey is one of the league’s worst. That’s about as far apart as two teams get.
The call The Capitals take a bigger share of their shots from within 20 feet than the Devils.
Shots from in close: Washington 8th, New Jersey 28th
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 4 and 4 games this season
These calls are written by fixed rules from the numbers below, and saved as they stand at puck drop. After the game, each one will be checked against what happened.
Style fingerprints
How New Jersey and Washington play, trait by trait, on the same scales.
Each scale runs from the league’s lowest team on the left to its highest on the right. Numbers blend last season with the 4 and 4 games played so far; traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
This season only: 4 games for New Jersey, 4 for Washington. Expect these to swing a lot, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
The biggest differences
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
New Jersey: 9.8% of chances come from rebounds31st of 32
New Jersey: 9.6% of chances come from rebounds17th of 32
Washington: 10.5% of chances come from rebounds5th of 32
Washington: 13.6% of chances come from rebounds9th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
New Jersey: 29.3% of shots come from within 20 feet28th of 32
New Jersey: 30.7% of shots come from within 20 feet21st of 32
Washington: 31.3% of shots come from within 20 feet8th of 32
Washington: 30.3% of shots come from within 20 feet23rd of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
New Jersey: a 6.1% chance of scoring on the average shot24th of 32
New Jersey: a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot20th of 32
Washington: a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot6th of 32
Washington: a 7.2% chance of scoring on the average shot6th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
New Jersey: 0.09 more penalties drawn than taken per 6010th of 32
New Jersey: 1.48 more penalties drawn than taken per 602nd of 32
Washington: 0.13 more penalties taken than drawn per 6027th of 32
Washington: 1.25 more penalties taken than drawn per 6031st of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
New Jersey: 1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded7th of 32
New Jersey: 0.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
Washington: 0.8 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded22nd of 32
Washington: 1.2 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded10th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
New Jersey: +0.12 goals saved above expected per 6014th of 32
New Jersey: −0.52 goals saved above expected per 6026th of 32
Washington: +0.24 goals saved above expected per 601st of 32
Washington: +1.59 goals saved above expected per 601st of 32
Show all 18 traitsHide the full set
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
New Jersey: 64.4 shot attempts per 605th of 32
New Jersey: 70.3 shot attempts per 602nd of 32
Washington: 57.0 shot attempts per 6014th of 32
Washington: 56.6 shot attempts per 6015th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
New Jersey: a 6.1% chance of scoring on the average shot24th of 32
New Jersey: a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot20th of 32
Washington: a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot6th of 32
Washington: a 7.2% chance of scoring on the average shot6th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
New Jersey: 9.8% of chances come from rebounds31st of 32
New Jersey: 9.6% of chances come from rebounds17th of 32
Washington: 10.5% of chances come from rebounds5th of 32
Washington: 13.6% of chances come from rebounds9th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
New Jersey: 7.8% of chances come right after a turnover3rd of 32
New Jersey: 13.1% of chances come right after a turnover5th of 32
Washington: 7.4% of chances come right after a turnover14th of 32
Washington: 11.5% of chances come right after a turnover9th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
New Jersey: 34.8% of shot attempts come from defensemen15th of 32
New Jersey: 34.3% of shot attempts come from defensemen16th of 32
Washington: 35.4% of shot attempts come from defensemen12th of 32
Washington: 35.6% of shot attempts come from defensemen12th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
New Jersey: 29.3% of shots come from within 20 feet28th of 32
New Jersey: 30.7% of shots come from within 20 feet21st of 32
Washington: 31.3% of shots come from within 20 feet8th of 32
Washington: 30.3% of shots come from within 20 feet23rd of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
New Jersey: 54.1 shot attempts allowed per 6011th of 32
New Jersey: 48.9 shot attempts allowed per 608th of 32
Washington: 57.9 shot attempts allowed per 6020th of 32
Washington: 57.1 shot attempts allowed per 6022nd of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
New Jersey: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot against26th of 32
New Jersey: a 6.8% chance of scoring on the average shot against25th of 32
Washington: a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot against28th of 32
Washington: a 7.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against28th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
New Jersey: 0.43 defensive breakdowns per 6026th of 32
New Jersey: 0.95 defensive breakdowns per 6030th of 32
Washington: 0.52 defensive breakdowns per 6032nd of 32
Washington: 1.02 defensive breakdowns per 6032nd of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
New Jersey: +0.12 goals saved above expected per 6014th of 32
New Jersey: −0.52 goals saved above expected per 6026th of 32
Washington: +0.24 goals saved above expected per 601st of 32
Washington: +1.59 goals saved above expected per 601st of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
New Jersey: 83.5 shots per 60, both teams combined8th of 32
New Jersey: 86.4 shots per 60, both teams combined6th of 32
Washington: 82.8 shots per 60, both teams combined12th of 32
Washington: 83.1 shots per 60, both teams combined11th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
New Jersey: forecheck score 94 (100 is league average)18th of 32New Jersey: 20.5 forecheck plays recorded per 6026th of 32
New Jersey: forecheck score 94 (100 is league average)16th of 32New Jersey: 21.9 forecheck plays recorded per 6021st of 32
Washington: forecheck score 88 (100 is league average)25th of 32Washington: 20.5 forecheck plays recorded per 6025th of 32
Washington: forecheck score 80 (100 is league average)27th of 32Washington: 20.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6025th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
New Jersey: hit score 81 (100 is league average)30th of 32New Jersey: 20.6 hits recorded per 6030th of 32
New Jersey: hit score 76 (100 is league average)27th of 32New Jersey: 20.7 hits recorded per 6030th of 32
Washington: hit score 99 (100 is league average)17th of 32Washington: 27.1 hits recorded per 6015th of 32
Washington: hit score 105 (100 is league average)13th of 32Washington: 31.8 hits recorded per 6011th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
New Jersey: 41.1% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six23rd of 32
New Jersey: 42.0% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six18th of 32
Washington: 43.0% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six10th of 32
Washington: 44.6% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six4th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
New Jersey: 8.2 expected goals per 60 on the power play7th of 32
New Jersey: 6.3 expected goals per 60 on the power play22nd of 32
Washington: 7.3 expected goals per 60 on the power play18th of 32
Washington: 6.5 expected goals per 60 on the power play20th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
New Jersey: 7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded15th of 32
New Jersey: 9.8 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded30th of 32
Washington: 8.2 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded27th of 32
Washington: 9.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded28th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
New Jersey: 1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded7th of 32
New Jersey: 0.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
Washington: 0.8 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded22nd of 32
Washington: 1.2 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded10th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
New Jersey: 0.09 more penalties drawn than taken per 6010th of 32
New Jersey: 1.48 more penalties drawn than taken per 602nd of 32
Washington: 0.13 more penalties taken than drawn per 6027th of 32
Washington: 1.25 more penalties taken than drawn per 6031st of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Lines and deployment
Washington is at home, so their coach changes last and chooses who plays against whom.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over each team’s last 10 games (4 and 4 so far), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
New Jersey Devils
- L19:39 a game
T. MeierN. HischierL. Evangelista
- Creates
- 3.30
- Allows
- 2.10
- Share
- 61.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 55%
- L28:30 a game
E. RodriguesA. GritsyukD. Mercer
- Creates
- 2.91
- Allows
- 2.17
- Share
- 57.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 61%
- L39:22 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.65
- Allows
- 2.24
- Share
- 54.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 62%
- L48:21 a game
- Creates
- 2.90
- Allows
- 2.44
- Share
- 54.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 80%
- P115:23 a game
- Creates
- 2.89
- Allows
- 2.30
- Share
- 55.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 67%
- P213:45 a game
- Creates
- 3.07
- Allows
- 2.47
- Share
- 55.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 58%
- P310:39 a game
- Creates
- 2.53
- Allows
- 2.36
- Share
- 51.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 68%
Washington Capitals
- L18:34 a game
- Creates
- 3.60
- Allows
- 2.54
- Share
- 58.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 23%
- L27:26 a game
- Creates
- 2.81
- Allows
- 2.33
- Share
- 54.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 43%
- L38:36 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.80
- Allows
- 2.11
- Share
- 56.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 60%
- L47:24 a gamein 2 of last 4
A. OvechkinD. StromeA. Beauvillier
- Creates
- 2.52
- Allows
- 2.56
- Share
- 49.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 100%
- P112:33 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.84
- Allows
- 2.25
- Share
- 55.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 38%
- P29:52 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.60
- Allows
- 2.51
- Share
- 50.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 10%
- P34:03 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.84
- Allows
- 2.82
- Share
- 50.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 67%
Worth knowing
- New Jersey C. Brown is out and has not played this season. He is a top-six forward. A. Mantha has taken his spot beside J. Bratt and J. Hughes.
- Washington M. Roy is day to day (lower body injury) and has missed the last 2 games. He is a top-four defenseman. T. Liljegren has taken his spot beside J. Chychrun.
Who Washington is likely to send against whom
Each strip shows how one Washington group’s 5-on-5 time at home has been split across opponents’ four forward lines. Tonight those lines are New Jersey’s, named in each box.
New Jersey’s lines tonightL1 Meier · Hischier · EvangelistaL2 Rodrigues · Gritsyuk · MercerL3 Glass · Boqvist · LombardiL4 Mantha · Bratt · Hughes
Washington forward lines against New Jersey forward lines
- L1Wilson · Tuch · DuboisNJD L139%NJD L238%NJD L314%NJD L49%
- L2Kyrou · Protas · ProtasNJD L122%NJD L230%NJD L324%NJD L423%
- L3Jenner · Sourdif · LeonardNJD L121%NJD L224%NJD L323%NJD L433%
- L4Ovechkin · Strome · BeauvillierNJD L124%NJD L223%NJD L320%NJD L432%
Washington defense pairs against New Jersey forward lines
- P1Chychrun · LiljegrenNJD L127%NJD L233%NJD L320%NJD L420%
- P2Desharnais · FehérváryNJD L131%NJD L229%NJD L316%NJD L424%
- P3McIlrath · HutsonNJD L112%NJD L28%NJD L341%NJD L439%
Based on 2 Washington home games this season, so treat it as a habit forming, not a certainty. Faded rows have under ten minutes. With no line matching, each group would face an opposing line about as often as that line is on the ice; a number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against it on purpose.
Special teams
Each power play set against the penalty killers it will face.
New Jersey power play against Washington penalty kill
New Jersey power play
8.2 expected goals per 60 · 7th of 32
Washington penalty kill
8.2 expected goals allowed per 60 · 27th of 32
New Jersey power play
PP164% of the time
Creates 6.5 expected goals per 60
- L. HughesQuarterback
- J. HughesDistributor
- N. HischierTrigger
- L. EvangelistaNet-front
- J. BrattNet-front
PP233% of the time
Creates 7.5 expected goals per 60
- D. HamiltonQuarterback
- T. MeierTrigger
- E. Rodrigues
- A. Mantha
- A. GritsyukDistributor
Washington penalty kill
Starts the kill
- T. Wilson15 of 15 kills · 0:57 a kill
- B. Jenner14 of 15 kills · 0:51 a kill · takes the draw
- V. DesharnaisD14 of 15 kills · 1:09 a kill
- M. FehérváryD13 of 15 kills · 1:08 a kill
- M. RoyD8 of 15 kills · 1:14 a kill
Second wave
- A. Protas13 of 15 kills · 0:54 a kill
- A. Tuch14 of 15 kills · 0:48 a kill
- A. Beauvillier6 of 15 kills · 0:36 a kill
- J. Sourdif7 of 15 kills · 0:31 a kill
- T. LiljegrenD11 of 15 kills · 0:53 a kill
- J. ChychrunD8 of 15 kills · 0:43 a kill
Washington power play against New Jersey penalty kill
Washington power play
7.3 expected goals per 60 · 18th of 32
New Jersey penalty kill
7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 · 15th of 32
Washington power play
PP166% of the time
Creates 7.1 expected goals per 60
- J. ChychrunQuarterback
- A. OvechkinTrigger
- P. DuboisNet-front
- D. StromeDistributor
- T. WilsonNet-front
PP234% of the time
Creates 7.0 expected goals per 60
- C. HutsonQuarterback
- A. Tuch
- J. Kyrou
- R. LeonardTrigger
- I. Protas
New Jersey penalty kill
Starts the kill
Second wave
- N. Hischier9 of 10 kills · 0:55 a kill
- E. Rodrigues8 of 10 kills · 0:47 a kill
- J. Bratt4 of 10 kills · 0:24 a kill
- D. HamiltonD9 of 10 kills · 0:49 a kill
- J. SiegenthalerD8 of 10 kills · 0:52 a kill
- L. HughesD5 of 10 kills · 0:28 a kill
Spot duty
- A. Gritsyuk2 of 10 kills · 0:32 a kill
- T. Meier1 of 10 kills · 0:34 a kill
- D. ChisholmD1 of 10 kills · 1:32 a kill
Units and penalty-kill roles use each team’s last 10 games; power-play role tags use this season and last, counting only games with the player’s current team; the map shows the last 140 power-play shots. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Goaltending
Is each goalie stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
J. Allen40 starts · 1109 shots, this season and last
+13.0 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .980 545 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .907 386 shots
- High-danger save %
- .657 178 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.38
- Quality starts
- 58%
N. Daws4 starts · 119 shots, this season and last
−1.2 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 53 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .905 42 shots
- High-danger save %
- .583 24 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.99
- Quality starts
- 50%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
L. Thompson60 starts · 1672 shots, this season and last
+42.1 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .976 839 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .900 569 shots
- High-danger save %
- .739 264 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 27.7
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.55
- Quality starts
- 70%
C. Lindgren22 starts · 631 shots, this season and last
−1.6 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .953 299 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .894 226 shots
- High-danger save %
- .651 106 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.55
- Quality starts
- 32%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- J. Allen: +13.0 goals saved above expected in 40 starts
- N. Daws: −1.2 goals saved above expected in 4 starts (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: +42.1 goals saved above expected in 60 starts
- C. Lindgren: −1.6 goals saved above expected in 22 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- J. Allen: 28.1 shots faced per 60
- N. Daws: 29.4 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: 27.7 shots faced per 60
- C. Lindgren: 29 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- J. Allen: the average shot he faces has a 7.2% chance of going in
- N. Daws: the average shot he faces has a 7.7% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in
- C. Lindgren: the average shot he faces has a 7.6% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- J. Allen: 0.38 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- N. Daws: 0.99 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: 0.55 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- C. Lindgren: 0.55 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- J. Allen: a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots
- N. Daws: a typical wait of 62 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: a typical wait of 73 seconds between shots
- C. Lindgren: a typical wait of 69 seconds between shots
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- J. Allen: a quality start 58% of the time
- N. Daws: a quality start 50% of the time (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: a quality start 70% of the time
- C. Lindgren: a quality start 32% of the time
J. Allen, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
N. Daws, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
L. Thompson, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
C. Lindgren, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Allen3 starts · 77 shots, this season
+0.1 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .971 34 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .862 29 shots
- High-danger save %
- .786 14 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 67%
N. Daws1 start · 32 shots, this season
−2.2 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 12 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .818 11 shots
- High-danger save %
- .556 9 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 32.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 2
- Quality starts
- 0%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
L. Thompson3 starts · 85 shots, this season
+4.7 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .971 35 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .917 36 shots
- High-danger save %
- .857 14 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.33
- Quality starts
- 100%
C. Lindgren1 start · 29 shots, this season
+1.5 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .941 17 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .857 7 shots
- High-danger save %
- 1.000 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 30.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.04
- Quality starts
- 100%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- J. Allen: +0.1 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- N. Daws: −2.2 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: +4.7 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- C. Lindgren: +1.5 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- J. Allen: 25.5 shots faced per 60
- N. Daws: 32.1 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: 28.4 shots faced per 60
- C. Lindgren: 30.2 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- J. Allen: the average shot he faces has a 7.5% chance of going in
- N. Daws: the average shot he faces has a 9.0% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: the average shot he faces has a 8.3% chance of going in
- C. Lindgren: the average shot he faces has a 7.5% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- J. Allen: 0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- N. Daws: 2 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: 1.33 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- C. Lindgren: 1.04 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- J. Allen: a typical wait of 71 seconds between shots
- N. Daws: a typical wait of 47 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots
- C. Lindgren: a typical wait of 71 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- J. Allen: a quality start 67% of the time
- N. Daws: a quality start 0% of the time (too few starts to place)
- L. Thompson: a quality start 100% of the time
- C. Lindgren: a quality start 100% of the time (too few starts to place)
J. Allen, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
N. Daws, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
L. Thompson, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
C. Lindgren, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
The menus list every goalie on each team, busiest this season first; the site does not yet know who will start. Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up many cross-ice passes looks worse here than he really is.
Where the goals come from
How each team’s goals are scored, or allowed, against the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play57%54.5%
- Power play20.4%16%
- Rebound3%11.6%
- Empty net7.7%9.5%
- Off a turnover4.3%4.4%
- Goalie pulled4.3%1.8%
- Shorthanded2.6%1.1%
- Off a faceoff win0.9%1.1%
235 New Jersey goals and 275 Washington goals scored this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play40%42.9%
- Power play40%14.3%
- Rebound10%7.1%
- Empty net0%7.1%
- Off a turnover10%28.6%
- Goalie pulled0%0%
- Shorthanded0%0%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
10 New Jersey goals and 14 Washington goals scored this season. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play58.5%53.8%
- Power play17.7%21.1%
- Rebound7.9%4.9%
- Empty net5.7%7.3%
- Off a turnover6%5.7%
- Goalie pulled2.6%2.4%
- Shorthanded1.1%4%
- Off a faceoff win0.4%0.8%
265 New Jersey goals and 247 Washington goals allowed this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play50%55.6%
- Power play28.6%22.2%
- Rebound0%0%
- Empty net0%11.1%
- Off a turnover7.1%11.1%
- Goalie pulled7.1%0%
- Shorthanded7.1%0%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
14 New Jersey goals and 9 Washington goals allowed this season. Each row has its own scale.
These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last. Each team page shows how much luck alone can move each row.
Data notes
- Sources. Game data from the NHL; expected goals from this site’s own model, cross-checked against MoneyPuck.com.
- Early season. New Jersey has played 4 games and Washington 4, so most numbers blend this season with last. The season switch at the top shows this season alone.
- Percentiles and ranks compare a team or player with the rest of the league: 90 means better than 90% of the league at that thing.
- Blind spots. Public game data doesn’t record passes before a shot, where defenders are standing, or rushes up the ice, so the site shows none of those.
- Hits, giveaways and takeaways depend on each arena’s scorer; anything built on them is arena-adjusted. How it works.
- Key players for each side are on the team pages.
Team pages: New Jersey Devils · Washington Capitals