Thursday, October 15
7:00 PM ET · Prudential Center
The short version
Before the game
The Rangers feed on mistakes, and the Devils make them
The Rangers come in at 4-2-0, the Devils at 1-2-0. New Jersey has controlled the play far better over recent games and has home ice. The Rangers can make it interesting if they pounce on loose pucks.
The Rangers come in at 4-2-0, the Devils at 1-2-0. New Jersey has controlled the play far better over recent games and has home ice. The Rangers can pull it off if they pounce on loose pucks.
The Rangers pounce on loose pucks, and the Devils cough them up. The Rangers and the Devils sit at opposite ends for physicality.
Who to watch
- Haunts themJack Hughes has eleven goals in ten games against the Rangers since 2023-24.
- Haunts themJ.T. Miller has four goals in six games against New Jersey since 2023-24.
- Still outC. Brown is out and hasn’t played yet this season.
The Rangers feed on mistakes, and the Devils make them
The Devils give up more dangerous chances after losing the puck than most, and the Rangers pounce.
The call The Rangers get at least their usual 7.7% of their 5-on-5 chances right after winning the puck.
NY Rangers 8th for chances off turnovers (7.7% of their chances come right after winning the puck) · New Jersey 26th for avoiding breakdowns
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 6 and 3 games this season
The Rangers hit; the Devils mostly don’t
On physicality, the Rangers is one of the league’s best and New Jersey is one of the league’s worst. That’s about as far apart as two teams get.
The call The Rangers hit more than the Devils in the close stretches of the game.
Physicality: NY Rangers 2nd, New Jersey 30th
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 6 and 3 games this season
These calls are written by fixed rules from the numbers below, and saved as they stand at puck drop. After the game, each one will be checked against what happened.
Style fingerprints
How NY Rangers and New Jersey play, trait by trait, on the same scales.
Each scale runs from the league’s lowest team on the left to its highest on the right. Numbers blend last season with the 6 and 3 games played so far; traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
This season only: 6 games for NY Rangers, 3 for New Jersey. Expect these to swing a lot, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
The biggest differences
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
NY Rangers: hit score 121 (100 is league average)2nd of 32NY Rangers: 32.0 hits recorded per 603rd of 32
NY Rangers: hit score 115 (100 is league average)9th of 32NY Rangers: 33.5 hits recorded per 608th of 32
New Jersey: hit score 78 (100 is league average)30th of 32New Jersey: 19.8 hits recorded per 6031st of 32
New Jersey: hit score 68 (100 is league average)31st of 32New Jersey: 18.5 hits recorded per 6031st of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
NY Rangers: 32.3% of shots come from within 20 feet3rd of 32
NY Rangers: 37.9% of shots come from within 20 feet1st of 32
New Jersey: 28.9% of shots come from within 20 feet29th of 32
New Jersey: 28.2% of shots come from within 20 feet24th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
NY Rangers: 0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded29th of 32
NY Rangers: 0.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded29th of 32
New Jersey: 1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded4th of 32
New Jersey: 0.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
NY Rangers: 51.0 shot attempts per 6028th of 32
NY Rangers: 49.0 shot attempts per 6026th of 32
New Jersey: 63.9 shot attempts per 605th of 32
New Jersey: 71.1 shot attempts per 602nd of 32
- PaceSlogTrack meet
NY Rangers: 77.2 shots per 60, both teams combined31st of 32
NY Rangers: 70.0 shots per 60, both teams combined31st of 32
New Jersey: 83.6 shots per 60, both teams combined8th of 32
New Jersey: 87.5 shots per 60, both teams combined6th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
NY Rangers: 0.22 more penalties taken than drawn per 6030th of 32
NY Rangers: 0.50 more penalties taken than drawn per 6026th of 32
New Jersey: 0.06 more penalties drawn than taken per 6011th of 32
New Jersey: 1.31 more penalties drawn than taken per 602nd of 32
Show all 18 traitsHide the full set
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
NY Rangers: 51.0 shot attempts per 6028th of 32
NY Rangers: 49.0 shot attempts per 6026th of 32
New Jersey: 63.9 shot attempts per 605th of 32
New Jersey: 71.1 shot attempts per 602nd of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
NY Rangers: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot14th of 32
NY Rangers: a 7.3% chance of scoring on the average shot5th of 32
New Jersey: a 6.1% chance of scoring on the average shot25th of 32
New Jersey: a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot20th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
NY Rangers: 10.0% of chances come from rebounds24th of 32
NY Rangers: 6.4% of chances come from rebounds25th of 32
New Jersey: 9.8% of chances come from rebounds32nd of 32
New Jersey: 8.2% of chances come from rebounds19th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
NY Rangers: 7.7% of chances come right after a turnover8th of 32
NY Rangers: 10.3% of chances come right after a turnover12th of 32
New Jersey: 7.7% of chances come right after a turnover7th of 32
New Jersey: 10.1% of chances come right after a turnover13th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
NY Rangers: 35.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen11th of 32
NY Rangers: 34.8% of shot attempts come from defensemen14th of 32
New Jersey: 36.1% of shot attempts come from defensemen7th of 32
New Jersey: 38.1% of shot attempts come from defensemen2nd of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
NY Rangers: 32.3% of shots come from within 20 feet3rd of 32
NY Rangers: 37.9% of shots come from within 20 feet1st of 32
New Jersey: 28.9% of shots come from within 20 feet29th of 32
New Jersey: 28.2% of shots come from within 20 feet24th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
NY Rangers: 55.9 shot attempts allowed per 6014th of 32
NY Rangers: 53.1 shot attempts allowed per 6013th of 32
New Jersey: 55.1 shot attempts allowed per 6012th of 32
New Jersey: 51.1 shot attempts allowed per 609th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
NY Rangers: a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against14th of 32
NY Rangers: a 6.7% chance of scoring on the average shot against22nd of 32
New Jersey: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot against26th of 32
New Jersey: a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot against25th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
NY Rangers: 0.42 defensive breakdowns per 6022nd of 32
NY Rangers: 0.42 defensive breakdowns per 6016th of 32
New Jersey: 0.44 defensive breakdowns per 6026th of 32
New Jersey: 1.30 defensive breakdowns per 6032nd of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
NY Rangers: +0.21 goals saved above expected per 604th of 32
NY Rangers: +1.15 goals saved above expected per 604th of 32
New Jersey: +0.11 goals saved above expected per 6016th of 32
New Jersey: −1.12 goals saved above expected per 6026th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
NY Rangers: 77.2 shots per 60, both teams combined31st of 32
NY Rangers: 70.0 shots per 60, both teams combined31st of 32
New Jersey: 83.6 shots per 60, both teams combined8th of 32
New Jersey: 87.5 shots per 60, both teams combined6th of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
NY Rangers: forecheck score 121 (100 is league average)3rd of 32NY Rangers: 27.4 forecheck plays recorded per 604th of 32
NY Rangers: forecheck score 118 (100 is league average)7th of 32NY Rangers: 29.1 forecheck plays recorded per 608th of 32
New Jersey: forecheck score 95 (100 is league average)17th of 32New Jersey: 20.7 forecheck plays recorded per 6023rd of 32
New Jersey: forecheck score 99 (100 is league average)16th of 32New Jersey: 23.0 forecheck plays recorded per 6017th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
NY Rangers: hit score 121 (100 is league average)2nd of 32NY Rangers: 32.0 hits recorded per 603rd of 32
NY Rangers: hit score 115 (100 is league average)9th of 32NY Rangers: 33.5 hits recorded per 608th of 32
New Jersey: hit score 78 (100 is league average)30th of 32New Jersey: 19.8 hits recorded per 6031st of 32
New Jersey: hit score 68 (100 is league average)31st of 32New Jersey: 18.5 hits recorded per 6031st of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
NY Rangers: 41.5% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six20th of 32
NY Rangers: 42.0% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six18th of 32
New Jersey: 40.5% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six28th of 32
New Jersey: 40.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six25th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
NY Rangers: 8.4 expected goals per 60 on the power play5th of 32
NY Rangers: 9.7 expected goals per 60 on the power play5th of 32
New Jersey: 8.2 expected goals per 60 on the power play7th of 32
New Jersey: 4.9 expected goals per 60 on the power play25th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
NY Rangers: 7.7 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded21st of 32
NY Rangers: 5.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded7th of 32
New Jersey: 7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded14th of 32
New Jersey: 10.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded31st of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
NY Rangers: 0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded29th of 32
NY Rangers: 0.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded29th of 32
New Jersey: 1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded4th of 32
New Jersey: 0.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
NY Rangers: 0.22 more penalties taken than drawn per 6030th of 32
NY Rangers: 0.50 more penalties taken than drawn per 6026th of 32
New Jersey: 0.06 more penalties drawn than taken per 6011th of 32
New Jersey: 1.31 more penalties drawn than taken per 602nd of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Lines and deployment
New Jersey is at home, so their coach changes last and chooses who plays against whom.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over each team’s last 10 games (6 and 3 so far), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
New York Rangers
- L111:21 a game
M. ZibanejadA. LafrenièreG. Perreault
- Creates
- 3.35
- Allows
- 2.25
- Share
- 59.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 67%
- L210:22 a gamein 3 of last 6
J. MillerP. DorofeyevT. Kartye
- Creates
- 3.04
- Allows
- 2.06
- Share
- 59.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 55%
- L38:12 a game
- Creates
- 2.33
- Allows
- 2.65
- Share
- 46.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 35%
- L46:40 a gamein 2 of last 6
O. BjorkstrandJ. ChmelarC. Beaudoin
- Creates
- 2.30
- Allows
- 2.63
- Share
- 46.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 33%
- P112:38 a game
- Creates
- 2.87
- Allows
- 2.37
- Share
- 54.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 57%
- P213:15 a game
- Creates
- 2.39
- Allows
- 2.90
- Share
- 45.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 30%
- P310:46 a game
- Creates
- 2.63
- Allows
- 2.67
- Share
- 49.7%
- Off. zone draws
- 45%
New Jersey Devils
- L19:22 a game
T. MeierN. HischierL. Evangelista
- Creates
- 3.20
- Allows
- 2.09
- Share
- 60.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 61%
- L28:29 a game
- Creates
- 3.16
- Allows
- 2.16
- Share
- 59.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 92%
- L37:54 a game
E. RodriguesA. GritsyukD. Mercer
- Creates
- 2.63
- Allows
- 2.30
- Share
- 53.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 69%
- L4New7:43 last game
- Creates
- 2.44
- Allows
- 2.65
- Share
- 48.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 57%
- P114:36 a game
- Creates
- 2.84
- Allows
- 2.11
- Share
- 57.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 73%
- P213:13 a game
- Creates
- 3.05
- Allows
- 2.65
- Share
- 53.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 62%
- P310:04 a game
- Creates
- 2.53
- Allows
- 2.58
- Share
- 49.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 78%
Worth knowing
- NY Rangers S. Durzi has started killing penalties: on the ice for 44% of the team’s shorthanded time in 6 games, up from 7% last season.
- New Jersey C. Brown is out and has not played this season. He is a top-six forward. A. Mantha has taken his spot beside J. Bratt and J. Hughes.
Who New Jersey is likely to send against whom
Each strip shows how one New Jersey group’s 5-on-5 time at home has been split across opponents’ four forward lines. Tonight those lines are NY Rangers’s, named in each box.
NY Rangers’s lines tonightL1 Zibanejad · Lafrenière · PerreaultL2 Miller · Dorofeyev · KartyeL3 Tolvanen · Cuylle · LabaL4 Bjorkstrand · Chmelar · Beaudoin
New Jersey forward lines against NY Rangers forward lines
- L1Meier · Hischier · EvangelistaNYR L128%NYR L213%NYR L322%NYR L436%
- L2Mantha · Bratt · HughesNYR L135%NYR L223%NYR L318%NYR L424%
- L3Rodrigues · Gritsyuk · MercerNYR L132%NYR L236%NYR L319%NYR L413%
- L4Glass · Boqvist · LombardiNYR L113%NYR L252%NYR L323%NYR L412%
New Jersey defense pairs against NY Rangers forward lines
- P1Pesce · HughesNYR L126%NYR L226%NYR L326%NYR L422%
- P2Hamilton · SiegenthalerNYR L129%NYR L238%NYR L322%NYR L411%
- P3Dillon · ChisholmNYR L130%NYR L224%NYR L34%NYR L442%
Based on 2 New Jersey home games this season, so treat it as a habit forming, not a certainty. Faded rows have under ten minutes. With no line matching, each group would face an opposing line about as often as that line is on the ice; a number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against it on purpose.
Special teams
Each power play set against the penalty killers it will face.
NY Rangers power play against New Jersey penalty kill
NY Rangers power play
8.4 expected goals per 60 · 5th of 32
New Jersey penalty kill
7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 · 14th of 32
NY Rangers power play
PP170% of the time
Creates 8.6 expected goals per 60
- A. FoxQuarterback
- A. LafrenièreDistributor
- M. ZibanejadTrigger
- P. Dorofeyev
- J. MillerNet-front
PP229% of the time
Creates 7.6 expected goals per 60
- S. DurziQuarterback
- W. CuylleTrigger
- G. PerreaultDistributor
- E. Tolvanen
- O. Bjorkstrand
New Jersey penalty kill
Starts the kill
Second wave
- N. Hischier7 of 8 kills · 1:02 a kill
- E. Rodrigues7 of 8 kills · 0:51 a kill
- D. HamiltonD7 of 8 kills · 0:53 a kill
- J. SiegenthalerD6 of 8 kills · 0:58 a kill
- L. HughesD5 of 8 kills · 0:28 a kill
Spot duty
- A. Gritsyuk1 of 8 kills · 0:33 a kill
- D. ChisholmD1 of 8 kills · 1:32 a kill
New Jersey power play against NY Rangers penalty kill
New Jersey power play
8.2 expected goals per 60 · 7th of 32
NY Rangers penalty kill
7.7 expected goals allowed per 60 · 21st of 32
New Jersey power play
PP162% of the time
Creates 6.1 expected goals per 60
- L. HughesQuarterback
- J. HughesDistributor
- L. Evangelista
- N. HischierTrigger
- J. BrattNet-front
PP235% of the time
Creates 6.8 expected goals per 60
- D. HamiltonQuarterback
- T. MeierTrigger
- E. Rodrigues
- A. Mantha
- A. Gritsyuk
NY Rangers penalty kill
Starts the kill
- W. Cuylle15 of 18 kills · 0:41 a kill
- N. Laba15 of 18 kills · 0:40 a kill · takes the draw
- V. GavrikovD17 of 18 kills · 0:58 a kill
- B. SchneiderD16 of 18 kills · 0:56 a kill
Second wave
- T. Kartye17 of 18 kills · 0:44 a kill
- J. Veleno11 of 18 kills · 0:52 a kill · takes the draw
- E. Tolvanen15 of 18 kills · 0:32 a kill
- M. Zibanejad14 of 18 kills · 0:34 a kill · takes the draw
- J. Miller12 of 18 kills · 0:21 a kill
- M. PetterssonD15 of 18 kills · 0:58 a kill
- S. DurziD15 of 18 kills · 0:55 a kill
- A. FoxD8 of 18 kills · 0:30 a kill
Spot duty
- C. Beaudoin2 of 18 kills · 0:36 a kill
Units and penalty-kill roles use each team’s last 10 games; power-play role tags use this season and last, counting only games with the player’s current team; the map shows the last 140 power-play shots. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Goaltending
Is each goalie stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
I. Shesterkin54 starts · 1534 shots, this season and last
+27.9 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .976 777 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .890 543 shots
- High-danger save %
- .743 214 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.33
- Quality starts
- 67%
D. Garand5 starts · 130 shots, this season and last
+7.4 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .987 75 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .971 34 shots
- High-danger save %
- .810 21 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.44
- Quality starts
- 100%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
J. Allen39 starts · 1088 shots, this season and last
+11.7 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .979 536 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .905 380 shots
- High-danger save %
- .651 172 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.39
- Quality starts
- 56%
N. Daws4 starts · 119 shots, this season and last
−1.2 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 53 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .905 42 shots
- High-danger save %
- .583 24 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.99
- Quality starts
- 50%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- I. Shesterkin: +27.9 goals saved above expected in 54 starts
- D. Garand: +7.4 goals saved above expected in 5 starts (too few starts to place)
- J. Allen: +11.7 goals saved above expected in 39 starts
- N. Daws: −1.2 goals saved above expected in 4 starts (too few starts to place)
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- I. Shesterkin: 28 shots faced per 60
- D. Garand: 28.4 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- J. Allen: 28.3 shots faced per 60
- N. Daws: 29.4 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- I. Shesterkin: the average shot he faces has a 7.0% chance of going in
- D. Garand: the average shot he faces has a 7.1% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- J. Allen: the average shot he faces has a 7.2% chance of going in
- N. Daws: the average shot he faces has a 7.7% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- I. Shesterkin: 0.33 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- D. Garand: 0.44 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- J. Allen: 0.39 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- N. Daws: 0.99 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- I. Shesterkin: a typical wait of 72 seconds between shots
- D. Garand: a typical wait of 59 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- J. Allen: a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots
- N. Daws: a typical wait of 62 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- I. Shesterkin: a quality start 67% of the time
- D. Garand: a quality start 100% of the time (too few starts to place)
- J. Allen: a quality start 56% of the time
- N. Daws: a quality start 50% of the time (too few starts to place)
I. Shesterkin, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
D. Garand, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Allen, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
N. Daws, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
I. Shesterkin4 starts · 109 shots, this season
+4.7 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .978 45 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .918 49 shots
- High-danger save %
- .800 15 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 24.4
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
D. Garand2 starts · 34 shots, this season
+2.2 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 19 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- 1.000 9 shots
- High-danger save %
- .833 6 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 22.7
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.34
- Quality starts
- 100%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
J. Allen2 starts · 56 shots, this season
−1.1 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .960 25 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .826 23 shots
- High-danger save %
- .750 8 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 27.8
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 50%
N. Daws1 start · 32 shots, this season
−2.2 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 12 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .818 11 shots
- High-danger save %
- .556 9 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 32.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 2
- Quality starts
- 0%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- I. Shesterkin: +4.7 goals saved above expected in 4 starts
- D. Garand: +2.2 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- J. Allen: −1.1 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- N. Daws: −2.2 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- I. Shesterkin: 24.4 shots faced per 60
- D. Garand: 22.7 shots faced per 60
- J. Allen: 27.8 shots faced per 60
- N. Daws: 32.1 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- I. Shesterkin: the average shot he faces has a 7.2% chance of going in
- D. Garand: the average shot he faces has a 6.9% chance of going in
- J. Allen: the average shot he faces has a 7.7% chance of going in
- N. Daws: the average shot he faces has a 9.0% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- I. Shesterkin: 0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- D. Garand: 1.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- J. Allen: 0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- N. Daws: 2 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- I. Shesterkin: a typical wait of 85 seconds between shots
- D. Garand: a typical wait of 73 seconds between shots
- J. Allen: a typical wait of 67 seconds between shots
- N. Daws: a typical wait of 47 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- I. Shesterkin: a quality start 100% of the time
- D. Garand: a quality start 100% of the time
- J. Allen: a quality start 50% of the time
- N. Daws: a quality start 0% of the time (too few starts to place)
I. Shesterkin, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
D. Garand, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Allen, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
N. Daws, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
The menus list every goalie on each team, busiest this season first; the site does not yet know who will start. Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up many cross-ice passes looks worse here than he really is.
Where the goals come from
How each team’s goals are scored, or allowed, against the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play55%58%
- Power play22.7%19.5%
- Rebound6.8%2.6%
- Empty net6.8%7.8%
- Off a turnover3.2%4.3%
- Goalie pulled2.4%4.3%
- Shorthanded2%2.6%
- Off a faceoff win1.2%0.9%
251 NY Rangers goals and 231 New Jersey goals scored this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play35.3%66.7%
- Power play23.5%16.7%
- Rebound5.9%0%
- Empty net29.4%0%
- Off a turnover5.9%16.7%
- Goalie pulled0%0%
- Shorthanded0%0%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
17 NY Rangers goals and 6 New Jersey goals scored this season. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play53.1%58.7%
- Power play20%17.4%
- Rebound8.1%8%
- Empty net10.4%5.7%
- Off a turnover3.1%6.1%
- Goalie pulled0.8%2.7%
- Shorthanded3.1%1.1%
- Off a faceoff win1.5%0.4%
260 NY Rangers goals and 264 New Jersey goals allowed this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play45.5%53.8%
- Power play18.2%23.1%
- Rebound0%0%
- Empty net18.2%0%
- Off a turnover18.2%7.7%
- Goalie pulled0%7.7%
- Shorthanded0%7.7%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
11 NY Rangers goals and 13 New Jersey goals allowed this season. Each row has its own scale.
These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last. Each team page shows how much luck alone can move each row.
Data notes
- Sources. Game data from the NHL; expected goals from this site’s own model, cross-checked against MoneyPuck.com.
- Early season. NY Rangers has played 6 games and New Jersey 3, so most numbers blend this season with last. The season switch at the top shows this season alone.
- Percentiles and ranks compare a team or player with the rest of the league: 90 means better than 90% of the league at that thing.
- Blind spots. Public game data doesn’t record passes before a shot, where defenders are standing, or rushes up the ice, so the site shows none of those.
- Hits, giveaways and takeaways depend on each arena’s scorer; anything built on them is arena-adjusted. How it works.
- Key players for each side are on the team pages.
Team pages: New York Rangers · New Jersey Devils