Saturday, October 10
7:00 PM ET · Enterprise Center
The short version
Before the game
The Blues have changed
The Blues haven’t won in three. The Blue Jackets are 2-1-0. Columbus has had more of the chances over recent games, Columbus is playing for the second night in a row, and St. Louis has home ice. Not by much, though: Columbus can make it interesting if their penalty kill holds up.
The Blues haven’t won in three. The Blue Jackets are 2-1-0. Columbus has had more of the chances over recent games, Columbus is playing for the second night in a row, and St. Louis has home ice. Columbus can tip it if their penalty kill holds up.
The Blues aren’t the team you remember for shot volume. The Blue Jackets and the Blues sit at opposite ends for power play.
Who to watch
- Owns themSean Monahan has a point in five straight games against St. Louis, and 8 points in his last five against them.
- Still outI. Provorov is on injured reserve (lower body injury) and hasn’t played yet this season.
- Still outT. Tucker is out indefinitely and hasn’t played yet this season.
- Slow startRobert Thomas is still looking for his first goal of the season.
The Blues have changed
Over this season and last, the Blues have been around the middle of the league for shot volume. This season alone they’ve been around the middle of the league, shooting more. We think tonight looks more like this season than the old Blues.
The call The Blues’ shot volume is better than their blended level of 55.2 per 60.
Shot volume: 19th over two seasons (55.2 per 60), 11th this season (58.1 per 60)
Style fingerprint · blended and this season only · 4 games this season
The Blue Jackets’ power play outclasses the Blues’
The Blue Jackets are around the middle of the league for the power play, at the lethal end; the Blues are the league’s worst, at the harmless end. Expect that gap to show.
The call The Blue Jackets’ power play creates more per 60 than the Blues’.
Power play: Columbus 16th, St. Louis 32nd
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 3 and 4 games this season
These calls are written by fixed rules from the numbers below, and saved as they stand at puck drop. After the game, each one will be checked against what happened.
Style fingerprints
How Columbus and St. Louis play, trait by trait, on the same scales.
Each scale runs from the league’s lowest team on the left to its highest on the right. Numbers blend last season with the 3 and 4 games played so far; traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
This season only: 3 games for Columbus, 4 for St. Louis. Expect these to swing a lot, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
The biggest differences
- PaceSlogTrack meet
Columbus: 83.5 shots per 60, both teams combined10th of 32
Columbus: 78.1 shots per 60, both teams combined20th of 32
St. Louis: 78.4 shots per 60, both teams combined28th of 32
St. Louis: 77.5 shots per 60, both teams combined22nd of 32
- Power playHarmlessLethal
Columbus: 7.4 expected goals per 60 on the power play16th of 32
Columbus: 7.1 expected goals per 60 on the power play15th of 32
St. Louis: 5.9 expected goals per 60 on the power play32nd of 32
St. Louis: 3.8 expected goals per 60 on the power play31st of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
Columbus: 8.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded29th of 32
Columbus: 7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded20th of 32
St. Louis: 7.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded17th of 32
St. Louis: 6.1 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded8th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
Columbus: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot12th of 32
Columbus: a 7.8% chance of scoring on the average shot1st of 32
St. Louis: a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot1st of 32
St. Louis: a 7.6% chance of scoring on the average shot2nd of 32
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
Columbus: 58.2 shot attempts per 6010th of 32
Columbus: 54.8 shot attempts per 6018th of 32
St. Louis: 55.2 shot attempts per 6019th of 32
St. Louis: 58.1 shot attempts per 6011th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
Columbus: 10.2% of chances come from rebounds17th of 32
Columbus: 23.0% of chances come from rebounds3rd of 32
St. Louis: 10.0% of chances come from rebounds26th of 32
St. Louis: 21.0% of chances come from rebounds4th of 32
Show all 18 traitsHide the full set
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
Columbus: 58.2 shot attempts per 6010th of 32
Columbus: 54.8 shot attempts per 6018th of 32
St. Louis: 55.2 shot attempts per 6019th of 32
St. Louis: 58.1 shot attempts per 6011th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
Columbus: a 6.5% chance of scoring on the average shot12th of 32
Columbus: a 7.8% chance of scoring on the average shot1st of 32
St. Louis: a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot1st of 32
St. Louis: a 7.6% chance of scoring on the average shot2nd of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
Columbus: 10.2% of chances come from rebounds17th of 32
Columbus: 23.0% of chances come from rebounds3rd of 32
St. Louis: 10.0% of chances come from rebounds26th of 32
St. Louis: 21.0% of chances come from rebounds4th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
Columbus: 7.2% of chances come right after a turnover21st of 32
Columbus: 1.7% of chances come right after a turnover32nd of 32
St. Louis: 7.3% of chances come right after a turnover19th of 32
St. Louis: 4.8% of chances come right after a turnover23rd of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
Columbus: 36.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen4th of 32
Columbus: 36.0% of shot attempts come from defensemen10th of 32
St. Louis: 36.6% of shot attempts come from defensemen5th of 32
St. Louis: 37.9% of shot attempts come from defensemen4th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
Columbus: 30.3% of shots come from within 20 feet21st of 32
Columbus: 32.3% of shots come from within 20 feet18th of 32
St. Louis: 29.5% of shots come from within 20 feet24th of 32
St. Louis: 30.8% of shots come from within 20 feet20th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
Columbus: 57.3 shot attempts allowed per 6019th of 32
Columbus: 56.6 shot attempts allowed per 6020th of 32
St. Louis: 54.9 shot attempts allowed per 6011th of 32
St. Louis: 52.4 shot attempts allowed per 6011th of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
Columbus: a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot against9th of 32
Columbus: a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against15th of 32
St. Louis: a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against7th of 32
St. Louis: a 5.7% chance of scoring on the average shot against4th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
Columbus: 0.38 defensive breakdowns per 606th of 32
Columbus: 0.00 defensive breakdowns per 601st of 32
St. Louis: 0.40 defensive breakdowns per 6015th of 32
St. Louis: 0.96 defensive breakdowns per 6030th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
Columbus: +0.13 goals saved above expected per 6010th of 32
Columbus: −0.03 goals saved above expected per 6019th of 32
St. Louis: +0.10 goals saved above expected per 6017th of 32
St. Louis: −0.07 goals saved above expected per 6020th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
Columbus: 83.5 shots per 60, both teams combined10th of 32
Columbus: 78.1 shots per 60, both teams combined20th of 32
St. Louis: 78.4 shots per 60, both teams combined28th of 32
St. Louis: 77.5 shots per 60, both teams combined22nd of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
Columbus: forecheck score 108 (100 is league average)9th of 32Columbus: 23.2 forecheck plays recorded per 6013th of 32
Columbus: forecheck score 106 (100 is league average)11th of 32Columbus: 24.0 forecheck plays recorded per 6016th of 32
St. Louis: forecheck score 105 (100 is league average)12th of 32St. Louis: 23.8 forecheck plays recorded per 6010th of 32
St. Louis: forecheck score 104 (100 is league average)12th of 32St. Louis: 25.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6012th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
Columbus: hit score 103 (100 is league average)14th of 32Columbus: 25.7 hits recorded per 6020th of 32
Columbus: hit score 108 (100 is league average)11th of 32Columbus: 29.1 hits recorded per 6018th of 32
St. Louis: hit score 104 (100 is league average)13th of 32St. Louis: 27.7 hits recorded per 6014th of 32
St. Louis: hit score 104 (100 is league average)14th of 32St. Louis: 30.0 hits recorded per 6014th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
Columbus: 42.7% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six13th of 32
Columbus: 43.4% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six13th of 32
St. Louis: 42.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six11th of 32
St. Louis: 42.4% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six17th of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
Columbus: 7.4 expected goals per 60 on the power play16th of 32
Columbus: 7.1 expected goals per 60 on the power play15th of 32
St. Louis: 5.9 expected goals per 60 on the power play32nd of 32
St. Louis: 3.8 expected goals per 60 on the power play31st of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
Columbus: 8.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded29th of 32
Columbus: 7.4 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded20th of 32
St. Louis: 7.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded17th of 32
St. Louis: 6.1 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded8th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
Columbus: 0.9 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded18th of 32
Columbus: 0.6 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded21st of 32
St. Louis: 0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
St. Louis: 0.9 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded14th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
Columbus: 0.13 more penalties taken than drawn per 6025th of 32
Columbus: 0.32 more penalties taken than drawn per 6021st of 32
St. Louis: 0.08 more penalties taken than drawn per 6023rd of 32
St. Louis: 1.24 more penalties taken than drawn per 6030th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Lines and deployment
St. Louis is at home, so their coach changes last and chooses who plays against whom.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over each team’s last 10 games (3 and 4 so far), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Columbus Blue Jackets
- L110:44 a game
C. CoyleM. OlivierC. Sillinger
- Creates
- 3.96
- Allows
- 2.62
- Share
- 60.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 29%
- L210:49 a game
- Creates
- 2.86
- Allows
- 1.97
- Share
- 59.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 60%
- L37:46 a gamein 2 of last 3
S. MonahanV. NichushkinD. Voronkov
- Creates
- 2.56
- Allows
- 2.48
- Share
- 50.8%
- Off. zone draws
- 36%
- L46:30 a gamein 2 of last 3
- Creates
- 2.35
- Allows
- 2.74
- Share
- 46.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- P117:26 a gamein 2 of last 3
- Creates
- 2.66
- Allows
- 2.13
- Share
- 55.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
- P2New6:22 last game
- Creates
- 2.50
- Allows
- 2.48
- Share
- 50.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 80%
- P32:26 in all
- Creates
- 2.94
- Allows
- 2.71
- Share
- 52.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 100%
St. Louis Blues
- L19:44 a game
R. ThomasD. HollowayJ. Snuggerud
- Creates
- 3.29
- Allows
- 2.00
- Share
- 62.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 49%
- L210:44 a gamein 2 of last 4
J. BerggrenC. McMichaelM. McTavish
- Creates
- 3.20
- Allows
- 2.23
- Share
- 58.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 65%
- L38:32 a gamein 2 of last 4
P. BuchnevichJ. NeighboursD. Dvorsky
- Creates
- 2.41
- Allows
- 2.28
- Share
- 51.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 64%
- L46:40 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.52
- Allows
- 2.62
- Share
- 49.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- P112:50 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.96
- Allows
- 1.93
- Share
- 60.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 39%
- P210:54 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 3.14
- Allows
- 2.47
- Share
- 56.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 62%
- P3New8:55 last game
- Creates
- 2.80
- Allows
- 2.65
- Share
- 51.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 83%
Worth knowing
- Columbus Z. Werenski is out long term (shoulder injury), reported after he played in their last game. He is one of their most valuable skaters.
- Columbus I. Provorov is on injured reserve (lower body injury) and has not played this season. He is a top-four defenseman. C. Soucy has taken his spot beside D. Mateychuk.
- Columbus D. Severson returned in their last game after missing 2 games.
- Columbus D. Heinen has started killing penalties: on the ice for 32% of the team’s shorthanded time in 3 games, up from 5% last season.
- St. Louis T. Tucker is out indefinitely and has not played this season. He is one of their more valuable skaters. B. Carlo has taken his spot beside C. Fowler.
- St. Louis L. Mailloux is out long term and has not played this season. He is a top-four defenseman. A. Jiricek has taken his spot beside P. Broberg.
Who St. Louis is likely to send against whom
Each strip shows how one St. Louis group’s 5-on-5 time at home has been split across opponents’ four forward lines. Tonight those lines are Columbus’s, named in each box.
Columbus’s lines tonightL1 Coyle · Olivier · SillingerL2 Johnson · Knies · FantilliL3 Monahan · Nichushkin · VoronkovL4 Heinen · Garland · Lomberg
St. Louis forward lines against Columbus forward lines
- L1Thomas · Holloway · SnuggerudCBJ L140%CBJ L222%CBJ L319%CBJ L419%
- L2Berggren · McMichael · McTavishCBJ L121%CBJ L254%CBJ L311%CBJ L415%
- L3Buchnevich · Neighbours · DvorskyCBJ L18%CBJ L213%CBJ L353%CBJ L426%
- L4Johnston · Dube · SuterCBJ L136%CBJ L28%CBJ L325%CBJ L430%
St. Louis defense pairs against Columbus forward lines
- P1Fowler · CarloCBJ L141%CBJ L216%CBJ L324%CBJ L419%
- P2Broberg · JiricekCBJ L18%CBJ L233%CBJ L333%CBJ L426%
- P3Parayko · BarronCBJ L126%CBJ L234%CBJ L320%CBJ L420%
Based on 1 St. Louis home game this season, so treat it as a habit forming, not a certainty. Faded rows have under ten minutes. With no line matching, each group would face an opposing line about as often as that line is on the ice; a number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against it on purpose.
Special teams
Each power play set against the penalty killers it will face.
Columbus power play against St. Louis penalty kill
Columbus power play
7.4 expected goals per 60 · 16th of 32
St. Louis penalty kill
7.5 expected goals allowed per 60 · 17th of 32
Columbus power play
PP180% of the time
Creates 7.0 expected goals per 60
- Z. WerenskiQuarterback
- M. Knies
- A. FantilliTrigger
- K. Johnson
- C. CoyleDistributor
PP220% of the time
Creates 7.4 expected goals per 60
- D. MateychukQuarterback
- D. VoronkovTrigger
- S. MonahanDistributor
- V. Nichushkin
- C. Garland
St. Louis penalty kill
Starts the kill
- P. Buchnevich12 of 14 kills · 1:02 a kill
- R. Thomas13 of 14 kills · 0:53 a kill · takes the draw
- P. BrobergD14 of 14 kills · 1:08 a kill
- C. ParaykoD14 of 14 kills · 1:04 a kill
Second wave
- P. Suter14 of 14 kills · 0:57 a kill
- C. McMichael13 of 14 kills · 0:38 a kill
- D. Dube9 of 14 kills · 0:42 a kill
- C. FowlerD12 of 14 kills · 1:01 a kill
- B. CarloD12 of 14 kills · 0:57 a kill
Spot duty
- J. Neighbours5 of 14 kills · 0:35 a kill
- D. Holloway4 of 14 kills · 0:23 a kill
- J. BarronD2 of 14 kills · 0:56 a kill
- T. LindsteinD2 of 14 kills · 0:34 a kill
St. Louis power play against Columbus penalty kill
St. Louis power play
5.9 expected goals per 60 · 32nd of 32
Columbus penalty kill
8.4 expected goals allowed per 60 · 29th of 32
St. Louis power play
PP153% of the time
Creates 5.9 expected goals per 60
- C. FowlerQuarterback
- D. Hollowayboth units
- J. SnuggerudTrigger
- R. ThomasDistributor
- M. McTavish
PP246% of the time
Creates 6.3 expected goals per 60
- A. JiricekQuarterback
- D. Hollowayboth units
- C. McMichael
- J. NeighboursDistributor
- P. BuchnevichTrigger
Columbus penalty kill
Starts the kill
- C. Coyle9 of 9 kills · 0:45 a kill · takes the draw
- S. Monahan8 of 9 kills · 0:38 a kill · takes the draw
- C. Sillinger5 of 9 kills · 0:31 a kill
- E. GudbransonD9 of 9 kills · 1:01 a kill
- Z. WerenskiD9 of 9 kills · 0:58 a kill
Second wave
- M. Olivier7 of 9 kills · 0:35 a kill
- D. Heinen6 of 9 kills · 0:40 a kill
- V. Nichushkin5 of 9 kills · 0:38 a kill
- C. SoucyD6 of 9 kills · 0:55 a kill
- D. MateychukD4 of 9 kills · 0:45 a kill
Spot duty
- A. Fantilli2 of 9 kills · 0:24 a kill
- D. SeversonD2 of 9 kills · 0:51 a kill
- J. ChristiansenD1 of 9 kills · 0:41 a kill
Units and penalty-kill roles use each team’s last 10 games; power-play role tags use this season and last, counting only games with the player’s current team; the map shows the last 140 power-play shots. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Goaltending
Is each goalie stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
J. Greaves57 starts · 1596 shots, this season and last
+19.4 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .967 844 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .872 517 shots
- High-danger save %
- .766 235 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.34
- Quality starts
- 65%
C. Talbot28 starts · 819 shots, this season and last
−3.8 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .976 418 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .865 282 shots
- High-danger save %
- .605 119 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 27.1
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.23
- Quality starts
- 54%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
J. Hofer47 starts · 1322 shots, this season and last
+20.3 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .981 725 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .875 432 shots
- High-danger save %
- .691 165 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.36
- Quality starts
- 62%
J. Binnington39 starts · 1046 shots, this season and last
−28.8 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .956 548 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .811 354 shots
- High-danger save %
- .701 144 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 26.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.3
- Quality starts
- 44%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- J. Greaves: +19.4 goals saved above expected in 57 starts
- C. Talbot: −3.8 goals saved above expected in 28 starts
- J. Hofer: +20.3 goals saved above expected in 47 starts
- J. Binnington: −28.8 goals saved above expected in 39 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- J. Greaves: 28.2 shots faced per 60
- C. Talbot: 27.1 shots faced per 60
- J. Hofer: 28.3 shots faced per 60
- J. Binnington: 26.5 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- J. Greaves: the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- C. Talbot: the average shot he faces has a 7.2% chance of going in
- J. Hofer: the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- J. Binnington: the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- J. Greaves: 0.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- C. Talbot: 0.23 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- J. Hofer: 0.36 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- J. Binnington: 0.3 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- J. Greaves: a typical wait of 71 seconds between shots
- C. Talbot: a typical wait of 75 seconds between shots
- J. Hofer: a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots
- J. Binnington: a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- J. Greaves: a quality start 65% of the time
- C. Talbot: a quality start 54% of the time
- J. Hofer: a quality start 62% of the time
- J. Binnington: a quality start 44% of the time
J. Greaves, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
C. Talbot, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Hofer, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Binnington, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Greaves2 starts · 57 shots, this season
−1.2 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .964 28 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .762 21 shots
- High-danger save %
- .875 8 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 0%
C. Talbot1 start · 22 shots, this season
+1.1 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 9 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .875 8 shots
- High-danger save %
- .800 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 20.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
J. Hofer3 starts · 71 shots, this season
+2.2 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 42 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .950 20 shots
- High-danger save %
- .556 9 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 23.8
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.34
- Quality starts
- 67%
J. Binnington1 start · 36 shots, this season
−2.4 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .938 16 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .867 15 shots
- High-danger save %
- .400 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 36
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 2
- Quality starts
- 0%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- J. Greaves: −1.2 goals saved above expected in 2 starts
- C. Talbot: +1.1 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- J. Hofer: +2.2 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- J. Binnington: −2.4 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- J. Greaves: 28.5 shots faced per 60
- C. Talbot: 20.3 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- J. Hofer: 23.8 shots faced per 60
- J. Binnington: 36 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- J. Greaves: the average shot he faces has a 6.6% chance of going in
- C. Talbot: the average shot he faces has a 8.9% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- J. Hofer: the average shot he faces has a 6.4% chance of going in
- J. Binnington: the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- J. Greaves: 0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- C. Talbot: 0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- J. Hofer: 0.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- J. Binnington: 2 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- J. Greaves: a typical wait of 67 seconds between shots
- C. Talbot: a typical wait of 73 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- J. Hofer: a typical wait of 73 seconds between shots
- J. Binnington: a typical wait of 78 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- J. Greaves: a quality start 0% of the time
- C. Talbot: a quality start 100% of the time (too few starts to place)
- J. Hofer: a quality start 67% of the time
- J. Binnington: a quality start 0% of the time (too few starts to place)
J. Greaves, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
C. Talbot, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Hofer, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Binnington, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
The menus list every goalie on each team, busiest this season first; the site does not yet know who will start. Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up many cross-ice passes looks worse here than he really is.
Where the goals come from
How each team’s goals are scored, or allowed, against the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play60.4%60.3%
- Power play15.7%15.5%
- Rebound6.7%4.6%
- Empty net6.7%6.3%
- Off a turnover4.7%6.3%
- Goalie pulled1.2%2.9%
- Shorthanded2%2.5%
- Off a faceoff win2.7%1.7%
255 Columbus goals and 239 St. Louis goals scored this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play55.6%33.3%
- Power play22.2%0%
- Rebound0%11.1%
- Empty net11.1%22.2%
- Off a turnover0%11.1%
- Goalie pulled0%11.1%
- Shorthanded0%11.1%
- Off a faceoff win11.1%0%
9 Columbus goals and 9 St. Louis goals scored this season. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play58.5%56.6%
- Power play20.8%19.9%
- Rebound4.2%7.1%
- Empty net5.4%5.2%
- Off a turnover3.5%6%
- Goalie pulled4.2%1.9%
- Shorthanded1.2%1.5%
- Off a faceoff win2.3%1.9%
260 Columbus goals and 267 St. Louis goals allowed this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play66.7%61.5%
- Power play33.3%7.7%
- Rebound0%0%
- Empty net0%15.4%
- Off a turnover0%15.4%
- Goalie pulled0%0%
- Shorthanded0%0%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
9 Columbus goals and 13 St. Louis goals allowed this season. Each row has its own scale.
These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last. Each team page shows how much luck alone can move each row.
Data notes
- Sources. Game data from the NHL; expected goals from this site’s own model, cross-checked against MoneyPuck.com.
- Early season. Columbus has played 3 games and St. Louis 4, so most numbers blend this season with last. The season switch at the top shows this season alone.
- Percentiles and ranks compare a team or player with the rest of the league: 90 means better than 90% of the league at that thing.
- Blind spots. Public game data doesn’t record passes before a shot, where defenders are standing, or rushes up the ice, so the site shows none of those.
- Hits, giveaways and takeaways depend on each arena’s scorer; anything built on them is arena-adjusted. How it works.
- Key players for each side are on the team pages.
Team pages: Columbus Blue Jackets · St. Louis Blues