Tuesday, October 13
7:30 PM ET · Canadian Tire Centre
The short version
Before the game
Best against best
The Senators are 3-1-0. The Blues haven’t won in three. Ottawa has controlled the play far better over recent games and has home ice. St. Louis’s way back in is keeping shots to a minimum.
The Senators are 3-1-0. The Blues haven’t won in three. Ottawa has controlled the play far better over recent games and has home ice. St. Louis’s best way through is keeping shots to a minimum.
It’s strength against strength: the Senators for chance quality, the Blues at preventing dangerous shots. The Blues aren’t the team you remember for shot volume.
Who to watch
- Haunts themJake Neighbours has four goals in six games against Ottawa since 2023-24.
- Still outT. Tucker is out indefinitely and hasn’t played yet this season.
- Still outL. Mailloux is out long term and hasn’t played yet this season.
- Slow startRobert Thomas is still looking for his first goal of the season.
Best against best
The Senators are near the top of the league for chance quality, and the Blues are near the top of the league at preventing dangerous shots. We think the Blues win this one.
The call The Blues keep the Senators’ chances less dangerous than the league average (a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot).
Ottawa 7th for chance quality (a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot) · St. Louis 7th for preventing dangerous shots
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 4 and 4 games this season
The Blues have changed
Over this season and last, the Blues have been around the middle of the league for shot volume. This season alone they’ve been around the middle of the league, shooting more. We think tonight looks more like this season than the old Blues.
The call The Blues’ shot volume is better than their blended level of 55.2 per 60.
Shot volume: 19th over two seasons (55.2 per 60), 11th this season (58.1 per 60)
Style fingerprint · blended and this season only · 4 games this season
Bring a pillow
St. Louis plays some of the league’s slowest games, and so does Ottawa. We think this one is even quieter than either team’s usual.
The call The game runs at fewer than 78.4 shots per 60 at 5-on-5, slower than either team’s usual.
Pace (shots per 60 at 5-on-5, both teams): St. Louis 28th (78.4), Ottawa 26th (79.2)
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 4 and 4 games this season
These calls are written by fixed rules from the numbers below, and saved as they stand at puck drop. After the game, each one will be checked against what happened.
Style fingerprints
How St. Louis and Ottawa play, trait by trait, on the same scales.
Each scale runs from the league’s lowest team on the left to its highest on the right. Numbers blend last season with the 4 and 4 games played so far; traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
This season only: 4 games for St. Louis, 4 for Ottawa. Expect these to swing a lot, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
The biggest differences
- Power playHarmlessLethal
St. Louis: 5.9 expected goals per 60 on the power play32nd of 32
St. Louis: 3.8 expected goals per 60 on the power play31st of 32
Ottawa: 7.6 expected goals per 60 on the power play11th of 32
Ottawa: 7.2 expected goals per 60 on the power play14th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
St. Louis: 10.0% of chances come from rebounds26th of 32
St. Louis: 21.0% of chances come from rebounds4th of 32
Ottawa: 10.5% of chances come from rebounds7th of 32
Ottawa: 13.8% of chances come from rebounds8th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
St. Louis: 0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
St. Louis: 0.9 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded14th of 32
Ottawa: 1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded7th of 32
Ottawa: 1.6 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded6th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
St. Louis: 0.08 more penalties taken than drawn per 6023rd of 32
St. Louis: 1.24 more penalties taken than drawn per 6030th of 32
Ottawa: 0.17 more penalties drawn than taken per 604th of 32
Ottawa: 0.25 more penalties drawn than taken per 6012th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
St. Louis: 36.6% of shot attempts come from defensemen5th of 32
St. Louis: 37.9% of shot attempts come from defensemen4th of 32
Ottawa: 33.4% of shot attempts come from defensemen23rd of 32
Ottawa: 29.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen29th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
St. Louis: 42.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six11th of 32
St. Louis: 42.4% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six17th of 32
Ottawa: 40.7% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six27th of 32
Ottawa: 39.3% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six31st of 32
Show all 18 traitsHide the full set
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
St. Louis: 55.2 shot attempts per 6019th of 32
St. Louis: 58.1 shot attempts per 6011th of 32
Ottawa: 54.7 shot attempts per 6021st of 32
Ottawa: 51.3 shot attempts per 6025th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
St. Louis: a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot1st of 32
St. Louis: a 7.6% chance of scoring on the average shot2nd of 32
Ottawa: a 6.6% chance of scoring on the average shot7th of 32
Ottawa: a 6.8% chance of scoring on the average shot13th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
St. Louis: 10.0% of chances come from rebounds26th of 32
St. Louis: 21.0% of chances come from rebounds4th of 32
Ottawa: 10.5% of chances come from rebounds7th of 32
Ottawa: 13.8% of chances come from rebounds8th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
St. Louis: 7.3% of chances come right after a turnover19th of 32
St. Louis: 4.8% of chances come right after a turnover23rd of 32
Ottawa: 7.6% of chances come right after a turnover9th of 32
Ottawa: 14.3% of chances come right after a turnover3rd of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
St. Louis: 36.6% of shot attempts come from defensemen5th of 32
St. Louis: 37.9% of shot attempts come from defensemen4th of 32
Ottawa: 33.4% of shot attempts come from defensemen23rd of 32
Ottawa: 29.7% of shot attempts come from defensemen29th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
St. Louis: 29.5% of shots come from within 20 feet24th of 32
St. Louis: 30.8% of shots come from within 20 feet20th of 32
Ottawa: 30.6% of shots come from within 20 feet16th of 32
Ottawa: 29.5% of shots come from within 20 feet22nd of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
St. Louis: 54.9 shot attempts allowed per 6011th of 32
St. Louis: 52.4 shot attempts allowed per 6011th of 32
Ottawa: 53.7 shot attempts allowed per 608th of 32
Ottawa: 58.3 shot attempts allowed per 6023rd of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
St. Louis: a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against7th of 32
St. Louis: a 5.7% chance of scoring on the average shot against4th of 32
Ottawa: a 6.2% chance of scoring on the average shot against10th of 32
Ottawa: a 6.3% chance of scoring on the average shot against18th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
St. Louis: 0.40 defensive breakdowns per 6015th of 32
St. Louis: 0.96 defensive breakdowns per 6030th of 32
Ottawa: 0.37 defensive breakdowns per 603rd of 32
Ottawa: 0.34 defensive breakdowns per 6015th of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
St. Louis: +0.10 goals saved above expected per 6017th of 32
St. Louis: −0.07 goals saved above expected per 6020th of 32
Ottawa: +0.06 goals saved above expected per 6025th of 32
Ottawa: +1.11 goals saved above expected per 605th of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
St. Louis: 78.4 shots per 60, both teams combined28th of 32
St. Louis: 77.5 shots per 60, both teams combined22nd of 32
Ottawa: 79.2 shots per 60, both teams combined26th of 32
Ottawa: 77.8 shots per 60, both teams combined21st of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
St. Louis: forecheck score 105 (100 is league average)12th of 32St. Louis: 23.8 forecheck plays recorded per 6010th of 32
St. Louis: forecheck score 104 (100 is league average)12th of 32St. Louis: 25.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6012th of 32
Ottawa: forecheck score 118 (100 is league average)5th of 32Ottawa: 27.9 forecheck plays recorded per 603rd of 32
Ottawa: forecheck score 116 (100 is league average)9th of 32Ottawa: 29.9 forecheck plays recorded per 607th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
St. Louis: hit score 104 (100 is league average)13th of 32St. Louis: 27.7 hits recorded per 6014th of 32
St. Louis: hit score 104 (100 is league average)14th of 32St. Louis: 30.0 hits recorded per 6014th of 32
Ottawa: hit score 118 (100 is league average)3rd of 32Ottawa: 32.2 hits recorded per 602nd of 32
Ottawa: hit score 115 (100 is league average)8th of 32Ottawa: 35.6 hits recorded per 606th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
St. Louis: 42.8% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six11th of 32
St. Louis: 42.4% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six17th of 32
Ottawa: 40.7% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six27th of 32
Ottawa: 39.3% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six31st of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
St. Louis: 5.9 expected goals per 60 on the power play32nd of 32
St. Louis: 3.8 expected goals per 60 on the power play31st of 32
Ottawa: 7.6 expected goals per 60 on the power play11th of 32
Ottawa: 7.2 expected goals per 60 on the power play14th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
St. Louis: 7.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded17th of 32
St. Louis: 6.1 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded8th of 32
Ottawa: 7.0 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded7th of 32
Ottawa: 9.0 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
St. Louis: 0.7 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded26th of 32
St. Louis: 0.9 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded14th of 32
Ottawa: 1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded7th of 32
Ottawa: 1.6 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded6th of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
St. Louis: 0.08 more penalties taken than drawn per 6023rd of 32
St. Louis: 1.24 more penalties taken than drawn per 6030th of 32
Ottawa: 0.17 more penalties drawn than taken per 604th of 32
Ottawa: 0.25 more penalties drawn than taken per 6012th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Lines and deployment
Ottawa is at home, so their coach changes last and chooses who plays against whom.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over each team’s last 10 games (4 and 4 so far), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
St. Louis Blues
- L19:44 a game
R. ThomasD. HollowayJ. Snuggerud
- Creates
- 3.29
- Allows
- 2.00
- Share
- 62.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 49%
- L210:44 a gamein 2 of last 4
J. BerggrenC. McMichaelM. McTavish
- Creates
- 3.20
- Allows
- 2.23
- Share
- 58.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 65%
- L38:32 a gamein 2 of last 4
P. BuchnevichJ. NeighboursD. Dvorsky
- Creates
- 2.41
- Allows
- 2.28
- Share
- 51.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 64%
- L46:40 a gamein 2 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.52
- Allows
- 2.62
- Share
- 49.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- P112:50 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.96
- Allows
- 1.93
- Share
- 60.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 39%
- P210:54 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 3.14
- Allows
- 2.47
- Share
- 56.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 62%
- P3New8:55 last game
- Creates
- 2.80
- Allows
- 2.65
- Share
- 51.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 83%
Ottawa Senators
- L17:07 a game
- Creates
- 2.92
- Allows
- 2.27
- Share
- 56.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 27%
- L27:41 a gamein 3 of last 4
F. ZetterlundD. CozensW. Eklund
- Creates
- 2.92
- Allows
- 2.08
- Share
- 58.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 40%
- L37:50 a gamein 2 of last 4
W. FoegeleD. BathersonT. Stützle
- Creates
- 2.30
- Allows
- 2.46
- Share
- 48.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 40%
- L43:54 a gamein 2 of last 4
N. CousinsH. HodgsonS. Halliday
- Creates
- 2.34
- Allows
- 2.75
- Share
- 46.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 60%
- P113:13 a game
- Creates
- 2.90
- Allows
- 2.61
- Share
- 52.6%
- Off. zone draws
- 43%
- P28:24 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.28
- Allows
- 2.64
- Share
- 46.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 53%
- P3New9:01 last game
- Creates
- 2.64
- Allows
- 2.62
- Share
- 50.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 43%
Worth knowing
- St. Louis T. Tucker is out indefinitely and has not played this season. He is one of their more valuable skaters. B. Carlo has taken his spot beside C. Fowler.
- St. Louis L. Mailloux is out long term and has not played this season. He is a top-four defenseman. A. Jiricek has taken his spot beside P. Broberg.
- Ottawa A. Zub has not played this season. He is a top-four defenseman.
- Ottawa J. Sanderson is out and has missed the last 3 games. He is a top-pair defenseman.
- Ottawa J. Spence has started killing penalties: on the ice for 41% of the team’s shorthanded time in 4 games, up from 4% last season.
Who Ottawa is likely to send against whom
Each strip shows how one Ottawa group’s 5-on-5 time at home has been split across opponents’ four forward lines. Tonight those lines are St. Louis’s, named in each box.
St. Louis’s lines tonightL1 Thomas · Holloway · SnuggerudL2 Berggren · McMichael · McTavishL3 Buchnevich · Neighbours · DvorskyL4 Johnston · Dube · Suter
Ottawa forward lines against St. Louis forward lines
- L1Giroux · Amadio · PintoSTL L15%STL L269%STL L320%STL L47%
- L2Zetterlund · Cozens · EklundSTL L15%STL L244%STL L345%STL L47%
- L3Foegele · Batherson · StützleSTL L123%STL L256%STL L311%STL L49%
- L4Cousins · Hodgson · HallidaySTL L10%STL L236%STL L364%STL L40%
Ottawa defense pairs against St. Louis forward lines
- P1Chabot · SpenceSTL L116%STL L254%STL L319%STL L411%
- P2Kleven · YakemchukSTL L111%STL L270%STL L312%STL L47%
- P3Matinpalo · StanleySTL L16%STL L218%STL L374%STL L42%
Based on 1 Ottawa home game this season, so treat it as a habit forming, not a certainty. Faded rows have under ten minutes. With no line matching, each group would face an opposing line about as often as that line is on the ice; a number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against it on purpose.
Special teams
Each power play set against the penalty killers it will face.
St. Louis power play against Ottawa penalty kill
St. Louis power play
5.9 expected goals per 60 · 32nd of 32
Ottawa penalty kill
7.0 expected goals allowed per 60 · 7th of 32
St. Louis power play
PP153% of the time
Creates 5.9 expected goals per 60
- C. FowlerQuarterback
- D. Hollowayboth units
- J. SnuggerudTrigger
- R. ThomasDistributor
- M. McTavish
PP246% of the time
Creates 6.3 expected goals per 60
- A. JiricekQuarterback
- D. Hollowayboth units
- C. McMichael
- J. NeighboursDistributor
- P. BuchnevichTrigger
Ottawa penalty kill
Starts the kill
- T. Stützle13 of 14 kills · 0:59 a kill
- C. Giroux11 of 14 kills · 0:24 a kill · takes the draw
- N. MatinpaloD12 of 14 kills · 1:10 a kill
- T. KlevenD11 of 14 kills · 1:10 a kill
Second wave
- S. Pinto13 of 14 kills · 1:02 a kill
- M. Amadio11 of 14 kills · 0:58 a kill
- W. Foegele8 of 14 kills · 0:25 a kill
- T. ChabotD13 of 14 kills · 1:00 a kill
- J. SpenceD13 of 14 kills · 0:49 a kill
Spot duty
- R. Greig5 of 14 kills · 0:45 a kill
- N. Cousins3 of 14 kills · 0:22 a kill
Ottawa power play against St. Louis penalty kill
Ottawa power play
7.6 expected goals per 60 · 11th of 32
St. Louis penalty kill
7.5 expected goals allowed per 60 · 17th of 32
Ottawa power play
PP151% of the time
Creates 6.4 expected goals per 60
- T. ChabotQuarterback
- D. Cozensboth unitsTrigger
- C. GirouxDistributor
- S. HallidayNet-front
- F. Zetterlund
PP249% of the time
Creates 7.9 expected goals per 60
- C. YakemchukQuarterback
- D. Cozensboth units
- T. StützleDistributor
- D. BathersonTrigger
- W. Eklund
St. Louis penalty kill
Starts the kill
- P. Buchnevich12 of 14 kills · 1:02 a kill
- R. Thomas13 of 14 kills · 0:53 a kill · takes the draw
- P. BrobergD14 of 14 kills · 1:08 a kill
- C. ParaykoD14 of 14 kills · 1:04 a kill
Second wave
- P. Suter14 of 14 kills · 0:57 a kill
- C. McMichael13 of 14 kills · 0:38 a kill
- D. Dube9 of 14 kills · 0:42 a kill
- C. FowlerD12 of 14 kills · 1:01 a kill
- B. CarloD12 of 14 kills · 0:57 a kill
Spot duty
- J. Neighbours5 of 14 kills · 0:35 a kill
- D. Holloway4 of 14 kills · 0:23 a kill
- J. BarronD2 of 14 kills · 0:56 a kill
- T. LindsteinD2 of 14 kills · 0:34 a kill
Units and penalty-kill roles use each team’s last 10 games; power-play role tags use this season and last, counting only games with the player’s current team; the map shows the last 140 power-play shots. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Goaltending
Is each goalie stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
J. Hofer47 starts · 1322 shots, this season and last
+20.3 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .981 725 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .875 432 shots
- High-danger save %
- .691 165 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.36
- Quality starts
- 62%
J. Binnington39 starts · 1046 shots, this season and last
−28.8 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .956 548 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .811 354 shots
- High-danger save %
- .701 144 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 26.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.3
- Quality starts
- 44%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
L. Ullmark50 starts · 1266 shots, this season and last
−1.2 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .980 643 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .881 438 shots
- High-danger save %
- .627 185 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.32
- Quality starts
- 62%
S. Ersson32 starts · 788 shots, this season and last
−11.8 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .972 387 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .818 275 shots
- High-danger save %
- .675 126 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 24.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.28
- Quality starts
- 38%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- J. Hofer: +20.3 goals saved above expected in 47 starts
- J. Binnington: −28.8 goals saved above expected in 39 starts
- L. Ullmark: −1.2 goals saved above expected in 50 starts
- S. Ersson: −11.8 goals saved above expected in 32 starts
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- J. Hofer: 28.3 shots faced per 60
- J. Binnington: 26.5 shots faced per 60
- L. Ullmark: 25 shots faced per 60
- S. Ersson: 24.3 shots faced per 60
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- J. Hofer: the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- J. Binnington: the average shot he faces has a 6.8% chance of going in
- L. Ullmark: the average shot he faces has a 6.9% chance of going in
- S. Ersson: the average shot he faces has a 7.0% chance of going in
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- J. Hofer: 0.36 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- J. Binnington: 0.3 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- L. Ullmark: 0.32 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- S. Ersson: 0.28 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- J. Hofer: a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots
- J. Binnington: a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots
- L. Ullmark: a typical wait of 83 seconds between shots
- S. Ersson: a typical wait of 85 seconds between shots
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- J. Hofer: a quality start 62% of the time
- J. Binnington: a quality start 44% of the time
- L. Ullmark: a quality start 62% of the time
- S. Ersson: a quality start 38% of the time
J. Hofer, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Binnington, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
L. Ullmark, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
S. Ersson, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Hofer3 starts · 71 shots, this season
+2.2 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 42 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .950 20 shots
- High-danger save %
- .556 9 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 23.8
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.34
- Quality starts
- 67%
J. Binnington1 start · 36 shots, this season
−2.4 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .938 16 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .867 15 shots
- High-danger save %
- .400 5 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 36
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 2
- Quality starts
- 0%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
L. Ullmark3 starts · 68 shots, this season
+4.8 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 31 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .935 31 shots
- High-danger save %
- .833 6 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0
- Quality starts
- 100%
S. Ersson1 start · 44 shots, this season
−0.4 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .955 22 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .929 14 shots
- High-danger save %
- .625 8 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 33.9
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.77
- Quality starts
- 0%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- J. Hofer: +2.2 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- J. Binnington: −2.4 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- L. Ullmark: +4.8 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- S. Ersson: −0.4 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- J. Hofer: 23.8 shots faced per 60
- J. Binnington: 36 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- L. Ullmark: 25.5 shots faced per 60
- S. Ersson: 33.9 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- J. Hofer: the average shot he faces has a 6.4% chance of going in
- J. Binnington: the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- L. Ullmark: the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in
- S. Ersson: the average shot he faces has a 7.8% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- J. Hofer: 0.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- J. Binnington: 2 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- L. Ullmark: 0 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- S. Ersson: 0.77 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- J. Hofer: a typical wait of 73 seconds between shots
- J. Binnington: a typical wait of 78 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- L. Ullmark: a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots
- S. Ersson: a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- J. Hofer: a quality start 67% of the time
- J. Binnington: a quality start 0% of the time (too few starts to place)
- L. Ullmark: a quality start 100% of the time
- S. Ersson: a quality start 0% of the time (too few starts to place)
J. Hofer, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
J. Binnington, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
L. Ullmark, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
S. Ersson, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
The menus list every goalie on each team, busiest this season first; the site does not yet know who will start. Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up many cross-ice passes looks worse here than he really is.
Where the goals come from
How each team’s goals are scored, or allowed, against the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play60.3%53.4%
- Power play15.5%22.6%
- Rebound4.6%7.2%
- Empty net6.3%6.5%
- Off a turnover6.3%4.1%
- Goalie pulled2.9%2.4%
- Shorthanded2.5%2.4%
- Off a faceoff win1.7%1.4%
239 St. Louis goals and 292 Ottawa goals scored this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play33.3%58.3%
- Power play0%25%
- Rebound11.1%8.3%
- Empty net22.2%0%
- Off a turnover11.1%0%
- Goalie pulled11.1%0%
- Shorthanded11.1%8.3%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
9 St. Louis goals and 12 Ottawa goals scored this season. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play56.6%54.3%
- Power play19.9%23.4%
- Rebound7.1%6.8%
- Empty net5.2%4.5%
- Off a turnover6%6.8%
- Goalie pulled1.9%1.5%
- Shorthanded1.5%1.9%
- Off a faceoff win1.9%0.8%
267 St. Louis goals and 265 Ottawa goals allowed this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play61.5%33.3%
- Power play7.7%33.3%
- Rebound0%0%
- Empty net15.4%11.1%
- Off a turnover15.4%22.2%
- Goalie pulled0%0%
- Shorthanded0%0%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
13 St. Louis goals and 9 Ottawa goals allowed this season. Each row has its own scale.
These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last. Each team page shows how much luck alone can move each row.
Data notes
- Sources. Game data from the NHL; expected goals from this site’s own model, cross-checked against MoneyPuck.com.
- Early season. St. Louis has played 4 games and Ottawa 4, so most numbers blend this season with last. The season switch at the top shows this season alone.
- Percentiles and ranks compare a team or player with the rest of the league: 90 means better than 90% of the league at that thing.
- Blind spots. Public game data doesn’t record passes before a shot, where defenders are standing, or rushes up the ice, so the site shows none of those.
- Hits, giveaways and takeaways depend on each arena’s scorer; anything built on them is arena-adjusted. How it works.
- Key players for each side are on the team pages.
Team pages: St. Louis Blues · Ottawa Senators