Tuesday, October 13
7:45 PM ET · UBS Arena
The short version
Before the game
Active D against forward-led
The Islanders are 2-2-0. The Canucks haven’t won in three. The Islanders have controlled the play far better over recent games, the Islanders may be without Barzal, and the Islanders have home ice. Vancouver’s way back in is pouncing on loose pucks.
The Islanders are 2-2-0. The Canucks haven’t won in three. The Islanders have controlled the play far better over recent games, the Islanders may be without Barzal, and the Islanders have home ice. Vancouver’s best way through is pouncing on loose pucks.
The Islanders and the Canucks sit at opposite ends for shots from defensemen.
Who to watch
- Owns themFilip Hronek has a point in six straight games against the Islanders.
- Hot streakBo Horvat has a point in every game this season.
- Still outM. Barzal is day to day and hasn’t played yet this season.
Active D against forward-led
The Islanders are one of the league’s best for shots from defensemen, at the active D end; the Canucks are one of the league’s worst, at the forward-led end. Expect that gap to show.
The call The Islanders’ defensemen take a bigger share of the team’s shot attempts than the Canucks’.
Shots from defensemen: NY Islanders 3rd, Vancouver 28th
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 6 and 4 games this season
Sheltered against exposed
The Islanders are around the middle of the league for preventing dangerous shots, at the sheltered end; the Canucks are one of the league’s worst, at the exposed end. Expect that gap to show.
The call The Islanders prevent dangerous shots better than the Canucks do.
Preventing dangerous shots: NY Islanders 21st, Vancouver 31st
Style fingerprint · this season blended with last · 6 and 4 games this season
These calls are written by fixed rules from the numbers below, and saved as they stand at puck drop. After the game, each one will be checked against what happened.
Style fingerprints
How Vancouver and NY Islanders play, trait by trait, on the same scales.
Each scale runs from the league’s lowest team on the left to its highest on the right. Numbers blend last season with the 6 and 4 games played so far; traits that take longer to settle lean more on last season.
This season only: 6 games for Vancouver, 4 for NY Islanders. Expect these to swing a lot, which is why the likely ranges are so wide.
The biggest differences
- GoaltendingSieveWall
Vancouver: −0.06 goals saved above expected per 6032nd of 32
Vancouver: −1.09 goals saved above expected per 6028th of 32
NY Islanders: +0.21 goals saved above expected per 603rd of 32
NY Islanders: +1.51 goals saved above expected per 602nd of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
Vancouver: 31.9% of shot attempts come from defensemen28th of 32
Vancouver: 31.8% of shot attempts come from defensemen23rd of 32
NY Islanders: 37.3% of shot attempts come from defensemen3rd of 32
NY Islanders: 34.5% of shot attempts come from defensemen15th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
Vancouver: 0.39 defensive breakdowns per 6011th of 32
Vancouver: 0.84 defensive breakdowns per 6029th of 32
NY Islanders: 0.48 defensive breakdowns per 6031st of 32
NY Islanders: 0.67 defensive breakdowns per 6023rd of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
Vancouver: 0.02 more penalties taken than drawn per 6020th of 32
Vancouver: 0.66 more penalties taken than drawn per 6026th of 32
NY Islanders: 0.11 more penalties drawn than taken per 608th of 32
NY Islanders: 0.25 more penalties taken than drawn per 6018th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
Vancouver: 1.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded13th of 32
Vancouver: 1.2 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded11th of 32
NY Islanders: 1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
NY Islanders: 2.5 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
Vancouver: a 6.8% chance of scoring on the average shot against31st of 32
Vancouver: a 7.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against27th of 32
NY Islanders: a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot against21st of 32
NY Islanders: a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against10th of 32
Show all 18 traitsHide the full set
Offense
- Shot volumeSelectiveRelentless
Vancouver: 45.4 shot attempts per 6031st of 32
Vancouver: 42.0 shot attempts per 6031st of 32
NY Islanders: 52.2 shot attempts per 6026th of 32
NY Islanders: 48.8 shot attempts per 6027th of 32
- Shot qualityHopefulDangerous
Vancouver: a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot17th of 32
Vancouver: a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot12th of 32
NY Islanders: a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot15th of 32
NY Islanders: a 6.9% chance of scoring on the average shot10th of 32
- Second chancesOne-and-doneCrashers
Vancouver: 10.7% of chances come from rebounds1st of 32
Vancouver: 18.9% of chances come from rebounds4th of 32
NY Islanders: 10.5% of chances come from rebounds6th of 32
NY Islanders: 6.7% of chances come from rebounds24th of 32
- Off-turnover offensePatientOpportunist
Vancouver: 7.0% of chances come right after a turnover23rd of 32
Vancouver: 16.6% of chances come right after a turnover2nd of 32
NY Islanders: 6.9% of chances come right after a turnover27th of 32
NY Islanders: 12.8% of chances come right after a turnover6th of 32
- Shots from defensemenForward-ledActive D
Vancouver: 31.9% of shot attempts come from defensemen28th of 32
Vancouver: 31.8% of shot attempts come from defensemen23rd of 32
NY Islanders: 37.3% of shot attempts come from defensemen3rd of 32
NY Islanders: 34.5% of shot attempts come from defensemen15th of 32
- Shots from in closeFrom distanceIn close
Vancouver: 29.6% of shots come from within 20 feet23rd of 32
Vancouver: 28.8% of shots come from within 20 feet25th of 32
NY Islanders: 30.7% of shots come from within 20 feet15th of 32
NY Islanders: 35.5% of shots come from within 20 feet6th of 32
Defense
- Shot suppressionPorousStingy
Vancouver: 62.2 shot attempts allowed per 6030th of 32
Vancouver: 64.0 shot attempts allowed per 6028th of 32
NY Islanders: 58.2 shot attempts allowed per 6021st of 32
NY Islanders: 57.0 shot attempts allowed per 6021st of 32
- Quality allowedExposedSheltered
Vancouver: a 6.8% chance of scoring on the average shot against31st of 32
Vancouver: a 7.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against27th of 32
NY Islanders: a 6.4% chance of scoring on the average shot against21st of 32
NY Islanders: a 6.0% chance of scoring on the average shot against10th of 32
- Breakdowns avoidedFire drillComposed
Vancouver: 0.39 defensive breakdowns per 6011th of 32
Vancouver: 0.84 defensive breakdowns per 6029th of 32
NY Islanders: 0.48 defensive breakdowns per 6031st of 32
NY Islanders: 0.67 defensive breakdowns per 6023rd of 32
- GoaltendingSieveWall
Vancouver: −0.06 goals saved above expected per 6032nd of 32
Vancouver: −1.09 goals saved above expected per 6028th of 32
NY Islanders: +0.21 goals saved above expected per 603rd of 32
NY Islanders: +1.51 goals saved above expected per 602nd of 32
Tempo and edge
- PaceSlogTrack meet
Vancouver: 80.5 shots per 60, both teams combined22nd of 32
Vancouver: 75.0 shots per 60, both teams combined24th of 32
NY Islanders: 81.7 shots per 60, both teams combined16th of 32
NY Islanders: 76.9 shots per 60, both teams combined23rd of 32
- Forecheck pressurePassiveHounding
Vancouver: forecheck score 97 (100 is league average)16th of 32Vancouver: 22.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6016th of 32
Vancouver: forecheck score 94 (100 is league average)17th of 32Vancouver: 23.2 forecheck plays recorded per 6016th of 32
NY Islanders: forecheck score 92 (100 is league average)23rd of 32NY Islanders: 21.3 forecheck plays recorded per 6020th of 32
NY Islanders: forecheck score 86 (100 is league average)21st of 32NY Islanders: 22.0 forecheck plays recorded per 6020th of 32
- PhysicalityFinesseBruising
Vancouver: hit score 99 (100 is league average)18th of 32Vancouver: 26.9 hits recorded per 6017th of 32
Vancouver: hit score 96 (100 is league average)18th of 32Vancouver: 28.8 hits recorded per 6019th of 32
NY Islanders: hit score 101 (100 is league average)15th of 32NY Islanders: 27.0 hits recorded per 6016th of 32
NY Islanders: hit score 106 (100 is league average)12th of 32NY Islanders: 31.4 hits recorded per 6012th of 32
- DepthTop-heavyDeep
Vancouver: 43.6% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six7th of 32
Vancouver: 44.1% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six8th of 32
NY Islanders: 44.5% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six1st of 32
NY Islanders: 46.1% of forward ice time at 5-on-5 goes to the bottom six1st of 32
Special teams
- Power playHarmlessLethal
Vancouver: 7.0 expected goals per 60 on the power play26th of 32
Vancouver: 4.5 expected goals per 60 on the power play29th of 32
NY Islanders: 6.7 expected goals per 60 on the power play29th of 32
NY Islanders: 5.9 expected goals per 60 on the power play25th of 32
- Penalty killLeakyAirtight
Vancouver: 8.6 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded31st of 32
Vancouver: 11.9 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded32nd of 32
NY Islanders: 8.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded30th of 32
NY Islanders: 8.5 expected goals allowed per 60 shorthanded25th of 32
- Power killBunkeredPredatory
Vancouver: 1.0 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded13th of 32
Vancouver: 1.2 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded11th of 32
NY Islanders: 1.1 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
NY Islanders: 2.5 expected goals created per 60 shorthanded2nd of 32
- DisciplineRecklessClean
Vancouver: 0.02 more penalties taken than drawn per 6020th of 32
Vancouver: 0.66 more penalties taken than drawn per 6026th of 32
NY Islanders: 0.11 more penalties drawn than taken per 608th of 32
NY Islanders: 0.25 more penalties taken than drawn per 6018th of 32
Forecheck pressure and physicality are arena-adjusted scores; switch “Hits and takeaways” to Raw in the settings to see the numbers as recorded. How the arena adjustment works.
Lines and deployment
NY Islanders is at home, so their coach changes last and chooses who plays against whom.
Lines and pairs are numbered by 5-on-5 ice time together over each team’s last 10 games (6 and 4 so far), with each older game counting half as much as the one after it, so the latest combinations come first. With so few games, each group’s results are pulled toward the average for its line number.
Vancouver Canucks
- L111:44 a gamein 3 of last 6
J. DeBruskE. PetterssonJ. Lekkerimäki
- Creates
- 3.11
- Allows
- 2.44
- Share
- 56.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 58%
- L2New11:28 last game
- Creates
- 2.66
- Allows
- 2.46
- Share
- 51.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 44%
- L3New12:06 last game
- Creates
- 2.40
- Allows
- 2.27
- Share
- 51.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 43%
- L4New7:45 last game
- Creates
- 2.52
- Allows
- 2.97
- Share
- 46.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 100%
- P111:11 a game
- Creates
- 2.29
- Allows
- 2.78
- Share
- 45.2%
- Off. zone draws
- 38%
- P211:41 a gamein 5 of last 6
- Creates
- 2.26
- Allows
- 2.56
- Share
- 46.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 51%
- P38:49 a gamein 4 of last 6
- Creates
- 2.46
- Allows
- 2.23
- Share
- 52.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 27%
New York Islanders
- L19:17 a gamein 3 of last 4
K. PalmieriB. HorvatE. Heineman
- Creates
- 3.06
- Allows
- 2.35
- Share
- 56.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 35%
- L29:02 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 3.10
- Allows
- 2.41
- Share
- 56.3%
- Off. zone draws
- 48%
- L38:54 a gamein 3 of last 4
J. PageauA. DuclairS. Holmstrom
- Creates
- 2.13
- Allows
- 2.32
- Share
- 47.9%
- Off. zone draws
- 48%
- L47:08 a gamein 3 of last 4
- Creates
- 2.62
- Allows
- 2.38
- Share
- 52.4%
- Off. zone draws
- 27%
- P1New15:03 last game
- Creates
- 2.48
- Allows
- 2.24
- Share
- 52.5%
- Off. zone draws
- 0%
- P2New11:01 last game
- Creates
- 2.57
- Allows
- 2.36
- Share
- 52.1%
- Off. zone draws
- 46%
- P3New7:35 last game
- Creates
- 2.62
- Allows
- 2.52
- Share
- 51.0%
- Off. zone draws
- 50%
Worth knowing
- Vancouver The forward lines keep changing. Even their four most-used trios over the last 6 games cover only 27% of their forwards’ 5-on-5 time, the second-lowest in the league (a typical team: 53%). The lines listed lean on their latest games, but expect new combinations tonight.
- Vancouver M. Sasson has started killing penalties: on the ice for 32% of the team’s shorthanded time in 6 games, up from 4% last season.
- Vancouver P. Cotter has started killing penalties: on the ice for 27% of the team’s shorthanded time in 6 games, up from 0% last season.
- Vancouver A. Bains has started killing penalties: on the ice for 26% of the team’s shorthanded time in 6 games, up from 3% last season.
- NY Islanders M. Barzal is day to day and has not played this season. He is one of their most valuable skaters. V. Eklund has taken his spot beside B. Schenn and C. Ritchie.
- NY Islanders K. Palmieri is no longer killing penalties: 0% of the team’s shorthanded time in 4 games, down from 37% last season.
Who NY Islanders is likely to send against whom
Each strip shows how one NY Islanders group’s 5-on-5 time at home has been split across opponents’ four forward lines. Tonight those lines are Vancouver’s, named in each box.
Vancouver keeps changing their forward lines, so the four named here (from their latest games) may not be the ones they send out tonight.
Vancouver’s lines tonightL1 DeBrusk · Pettersson · LekkerimäkiL2 Karlsson · Cotter · RossiL3 Boeser · O'Connor · OhgrenL4 Gallagher · Bains · Sasson
NY Islanders forward lines against Vancouver forward lines
- L1Palmieri · Horvat · HeinemanVAN L132%VAN L231%VAN L315%VAN L422%
- L2Schenn · Ritchie · EklundVAN L129%VAN L231%VAN L323%VAN L417%
- L3Pageau · Duclair · HolmstromVAN L121%VAN L217%VAN L328%VAN L434%
- L4Cizikas · Palat · MaccelliVAN L131%VAN L236%VAN L319%VAN L415%
NY Islanders defense pairs against Vancouver forward lines
- P1Stanley · SchaeferVAN L122%VAN L227%VAN L326%VAN L425%
- P2Pelech · PulockVAN L127%VAN L241%VAN L313%VAN L419%
- P3Mayfield · DeAngeloVAN L175%VAN L22%VAN L316%VAN L47%
Based on 2 NY Islanders home games this season, so treat it as a habit forming, not a certainty. Faded rows have under ten minutes. With no line matching, each group would face an opposing line about as often as that line is on the ice; a number well above that means the coach is sending that group out against it on purpose.
Special teams
Each power play set against the penalty killers it will face.
Vancouver power play against NY Islanders penalty kill
Vancouver power play
7.0 expected goals per 60 · 26th of 32
NY Islanders penalty kill
8.5 expected goals allowed per 60 · 30th of 32
Vancouver power play
PP162% of the time
Creates 6.3 expected goals per 60
- F. HronekQuarterback
- B. BoeserDistributor
- M. Rossi
- E. Pettersson
- J. DeBruskTrigger
PP237% of the time
Creates 5.7 expected goals per 60
- Z. BuiumQuarterback
- L. KarlssonTrigger
- T. WillanderPoint
- J. Lekkerimäki
- L. OhgrenNet-front
NY Islanders penalty kill
Starts the kill
- J. Pageau14 of 14 kills · 0:49 a kill · takes the draw
- S. Holmstrom14 of 14 kills · 0:45 a kill
- R. PulockD14 of 14 kills · 1:10 a kill
- A. PelechD14 of 14 kills · 1:07 a kill
Second wave
- E. Heineman14 of 14 kills · 0:47 a kill
- B. Horvat12 of 14 kills · 0:47 a kill
- C. Cizikas12 of 14 kills · 0:40 a kill
- O. Palat9 of 14 kills · 0:29 a kill
- L. StanleyD13 of 14 kills · 0:51 a kill
- A. RomanovD11 of 14 kills · 0:53 a kill
Spot duty
- S. MayfieldD2 of 14 kills · 0:51 a kill
NY Islanders power play against Vancouver penalty kill
NY Islanders power play
6.7 expected goals per 60 · 29th of 32
Vancouver penalty kill
8.6 expected goals allowed per 60 · 31st of 32
NY Islanders power play
PP172% of the time
Creates 7.2 expected goals per 60
- M. SchaeferQuarterback
- M. Maccelli
- K. PalmieriNet-front
- B. HorvatTrigger
- B. Schenn
PP228% of the time
Creates 6.2 expected goals per 60
- T. DeAngeloQuarterback
- C. RitchieTrigger
- S. Holmstrom
- V. Eklund
- A. DuclairNet-front
Vancouver penalty kill
Starts the kill
- D. O'Connor16 of 20 kills · 0:42 a kill
- E. Pettersson17 of 20 kills · 0:36 a kill · takes the draw
- F. HronekD20 of 20 kills · 0:56 a kill
- J. OleksiakD17 of 20 kills · 0:50 a kill
Second wave
Spot duty
- B. Gallagher6 of 20 kills · 0:36 a kill
- T. WillanderD6 of 20 kills · 0:41 a kill
- V. ManciniD2 of 20 kills · 0:54 a kill
Units and penalty-kill roles use each team’s last 10 games; power-play role tags use this season and last, counting only games with the player’s current team; the map shows the last 140 power-play shots. Point at a power-play name to see his shots on the map.
Goaltending
Is each goalie stopping more than he should, and what is his team asking him to face?
K. Lankinen48 starts · 1392 shots, this season and last
−23.9 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .962 660 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .858 507 shots
- High-danger save %
- .618 225 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 30
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.41
- Quality starts
- 44%
L. Meriläinen22 starts · 541 shots, this season and last
−16.3 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .965 287 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .836 183 shots
- High-danger save %
- .577 71 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 25.8
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.14
- Quality starts
- 45%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
I. Sorokin58 starts · 1616 shots, this season and last
+32.5 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .975 791 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .880 566 shots
- High-danger save %
- .772 259 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 28.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.42
- Quality starts
- 55%
S. Varlamov1 start · 22 shots, this season and last
+0.6 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .875 8 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .800 10 shots
- High-danger save %
- 1.000 4 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 22.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.01
- Quality starts
- 0%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- K. Lankinen: −23.9 goals saved above expected in 48 starts
- L. Meriläinen: −16.3 goals saved above expected in 22 starts
- I. Sorokin: +32.5 goals saved above expected in 58 starts
- S. Varlamov: +0.6 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- K. Lankinen: 30 shots faced per 60
- L. Meriläinen: 25.8 shots faced per 60
- I. Sorokin: 28.5 shots faced per 60
- S. Varlamov: 22.2 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- K. Lankinen: the average shot he faces has a 7.6% chance of going in
- L. Meriläinen: the average shot he faces has a 6.9% chance of going in
- I. Sorokin: the average shot he faces has a 7.3% chance of going in
- S. Varlamov: the average shot he faces has a 9.6% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- K. Lankinen: 0.41 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- L. Meriläinen: 0.14 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- I. Sorokin: 0.42 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- S. Varlamov: 1.01 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- K. Lankinen: a typical wait of 66 seconds between shots
- L. Meriläinen: a typical wait of 75 seconds between shots
- I. Sorokin: a typical wait of 70 seconds between shots
- S. Varlamov: a typical wait of 38 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- K. Lankinen: a quality start 44% of the time
- L. Meriläinen: a quality start 45% of the time
- I. Sorokin: a quality start 55% of the time
- S. Varlamov: a quality start 0% of the time (too few starts to place)
K. Lankinen, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
L. Meriläinen, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
I. Sorokin, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
S. Varlamov, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
K. Lankinen3 starts · 107 shots, this season
−8.3 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- .905 42 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .897 29 shots
- High-danger save %
- .556 36 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 33.3
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.31
- Quality starts
- 33%
L. Meriläinen3 starts · 84 shots, this season
+1.8 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 39 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .857 35 shots
- High-danger save %
- .900 10 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 30.5
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.36
- Quality starts
- 100%
Helping, or hung out to dry?
I. Sorokin3 starts · 86 shots, this season
+5.3 goals saved above expected

- Low-danger save %
- 1.000 42 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .974 38 shots
- High-danger save %
- .667 6 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 29
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 0.34
- Quality starts
- 100%
S. Varlamov1 start · 22 shots, this season
+0.6 goals saved above expected too few starts to rate

- Low-danger save %
- .875 8 shots
- Medium-danger save %
- .800 10 shots
- High-danger save %
- 1.000 4 shots
- Shots faced per 60
- 22.2
- Defensive breakdowns per 60
- 1.01
- Quality starts
- 0%
Show the full goalie comparisonHide the full goalie comparison
- Stopping more than expectedSieveWall
- K. Lankinen: −8.3 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- L. Meriläinen: +1.8 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- I. Sorokin: +5.3 goals saved above expected in 3 starts
- S. Varlamov: +0.6 goals saved above expected in 1 start (too few starts to place)
- How busy he isQuietUnder siege
- K. Lankinen: 33.3 shots faced per 60
- L. Meriläinen: 30.5 shots faced per 60
- I. Sorokin: 29 shots faced per 60
- S. Varlamov: 22.2 shots faced per 60 (too few starts to place)
- How dangerous the shots areShelteredExposed
- K. Lankinen: the average shot he faces has a 9.9% chance of going in
- L. Meriläinen: the average shot he faces has a 6.6% chance of going in
- I. Sorokin: the average shot he faces has a 6.5% chance of going in
- S. Varlamov: the average shot he faces has a 9.6% chance of going in (too few starts to place)
- Breakdowns in front of himRareConstant
- K. Lankinen: 0.31 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- L. Meriläinen: 0.36 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- I. Sorokin: 0.34 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60
- S. Varlamov: 1.01 defensive breakdowns in front of him per 60 (too few starts to place)
- Waiting between shotsSteady workLong waits
- K. Lankinen: a typical wait of 62 seconds between shots
- L. Meriläinen: a typical wait of 76 seconds between shots
- I. Sorokin: a typical wait of 72 seconds between shots
- S. Varlamov: a typical wait of 38 seconds between shots (too few starts to place)
- Night-to-night steadinessStreakySteady
- K. Lankinen: a quality start 33% of the time
- L. Meriläinen: a quality start 100% of the time
- I. Sorokin: a quality start 100% of the time
- S. Varlamov: a quality start 0% of the time (too few starts to place)
K. Lankinen, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
L. Meriläinen, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
I. Sorokin, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
S. Varlamov, night to night: goals saved above expected in each start
The menus list every goalie on each team, busiest this season first; the site does not yet know who will start. Expected-goal models can’t see passes before a shot, so a goalie whose team gives up many cross-ice passes looks worse here than he really is.
Where the goals come from
How each team’s goals are scored, or allowed, against the league average.
- Everyday even-strength play51.3%55.6%
- Power play23.7%17.4%
- Rebound8.6%6.6%
- Empty net3.9%3.3%
- Off a turnover3.9%2.5%
- Goalie pulled3%6.2%
- Shorthanded3.4%4.6%
- Off a faceoff win2.2%3.7%
232 Vancouver goals and 241 NY Islanders goals scored this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play50%46.2%
- Power play18.2%23.1%
- Rebound18.2%0%
- Empty net4.5%7.7%
- Off a turnover4.5%7.7%
- Goalie pulled0%0%
- Shorthanded4.5%15.4%
- Off a faceoff win0%0%
22 Vancouver goals and 13 NY Islanders goals scored this season. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play54.5%58.6%
- Power play20.7%17.2%
- Rebound7.9%4.5%
- Empty net7%6.6%
- Off a turnover3.2%4.5%
- Goalie pulled2.3%3.7%
- Shorthanded1.7%3.7%
- Off a faceoff win2.6%1.2%
343 Vancouver goals and 244 NY Islanders goals allowed this season and last. Each row has its own scale.
- Everyday even-strength play34.5%25%
- Power play34.5%25%
- Rebound10.3%0%
- Empty net0%25%
- Off a turnover0%12.5%
- Goalie pulled3.4%12.5%
- Shorthanded10.3%0%
- Off a faceoff win6.9%0%
29 Vancouver goals and 8 NY Islanders goals allowed this season. Each row has its own scale.
These mixes are mostly luck: over three seasons, teams’ goals came from much the same places, and most of the differences here didn’t last. Each team page shows how much luck alone can move each row.
Data notes
- Sources. Game data from the NHL; expected goals from this site’s own model, cross-checked against MoneyPuck.com.
- Early season. Vancouver has played 6 games and NY Islanders 4, so most numbers blend this season with last. The season switch at the top shows this season alone.
- Percentiles and ranks compare a team or player with the rest of the league: 90 means better than 90% of the league at that thing.
- Blind spots. Public game data doesn’t record passes before a shot, where defenders are standing, or rushes up the ice, so the site shows none of those.
- Hits, giveaways and takeaways depend on each arena’s scorer; anything built on them is arena-adjusted. How it works.
- Key players for each side are on the team pages.
Team pages: Vancouver Canucks · New York Islanders